Literature DB >> 28911433

Possible molecular targets for therapeutic applications of caffeic acid phenethyl ester in inflammation and cancer.

Ghulam Murtaza1, Ashif Sajjad2, Zahid Mehmood2, Syed H Shah3, Abdul R Siddiqi4.   

Abstract

Of the various derivatives of caffeic acid, caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) is a hydrophobic, bioactive polyphenolic ester obtained from propolis extract. The objective in writing this review article was to summarize all published studies on therapeutics of CAPE in inflammation and cancer to extract direction for future research. The possible molecular targets for the action of CAPE, include various transcription factors such as nuclear factor-κB, tissue necrosis factor-α, interleukin-6, cyclooxygenase-2, Nrf2, inducible nitric oxide synthase, nuclear factor of activated T cells, hypoxia-inducible factor-1α, and signal transducers and activators of transcription. Based on the valuable data on its therapeutics in inflammation and cancer, clinical studies of CAPE should also be conducted to explore its toxicities, if any.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  caffeic acid phenethyl ester; cancer; chemotherapy; inflammation; molecular targets

Year:  2014        PMID: 28911433      PMCID: PMC9351751          DOI: 10.1016/j.jfda.2014.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Drug Anal            Impact factor:   6.157


1. Introduction

Due to the lethal side effects of synthetic chemical-based drugs, enthusiastic efforts are currently being applied to explore natural therapeutic agents with minimum toxicity. In this context, plant or herbal origin compounds are being studied to investigate the bioactivities of their natural active compounds. Polyphenols represent one of the most intensively studied groups of natural compounds. Caffeic acid has been proposed to act as a multipurpose active polyphenol and its derivatives have also been subjected to considerable study. One of the derivatives of caffeic acid is caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE), which possesses promising therapeutic potential against various pathologies such as inflammation, cancer, infection, and neurodegeneration [1-5]. This naturally bioactive, hydrophobic polyphenolic ester occurs in numerous plants [6-9] and propolis [10] and can also be prepared by reacting caffeic acid with phenethyl alcohols [1-3]. The molecular formula of CAPE is C17H16O4 and is chemically recognized as 2-phenylethyl (2E)-3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)acrylate (commonly termed as phenylethyl caffeate or phenethyl caffeate) [4]. To achieve biological effects, CAPE should be administered at a therapeutic concentration so that prolonged maintenance of blood CAPE-concentration at a particular level could be achieved. Thus pharmacokinetic and bioavailability study of CAPE is crucial for determining its route of administration. Fig. 1 depicts the chemical structure of CAPE consisting of a catechol ring and two hydroxyl groups; the former is considered to be responsible for its therapeutic features [5]. It has been proposed that metabolism of CAPE is a saturable process because an increase in the area under the plasma concentration–time curve for CAPE was observed in a proportion higher than the increase in its dose. Moreover, volume of distribution and total body clearance values for CAPE were found to be in the ranges of 1555–5209 mL/kg and 42–172 mL/minute/kg, respectively, proposing that these values are in an inverse relationship with the dose of CAPE. Additionally, no relationship was observed between the values of elimination half-life (21.24–26.71 minutes) of CAPE and its dose. Pharmacokinetic study of CAPE showed its high values of volume of distribution and short elimination half-life, revealing its extensive distribution and swift elimination from the body after intravenous administration [11]. Another pharmaco-kinetic study of CAPE showed comparable results [12]. Furthermore, pharmacokinetic analysis of CAPE and its metabolites should also be carried out after its oral administration. Another study has revealed that CAPE can efficiently cross the blood–brain barrier in rats [13]. Besides, although CAPE is stable for 6 hours in rat plasma, after which it hydrolyzes to caffeic acid, CAPE hydrolysis does not occur in human plasma showing its stability, possibly owing to the absence of carboxylesterase in this biofluid [14,15].
Fig. 1

Chemical structure of caffeic acid phenethyl ester [9].

After an extensive search, no data were found about toxicity study of CAPE. Rather, slight toxicity of propolis was seen in a range of 2000–7300 g of propolis/kg in mice that is an origin of CAPE [16,17]. At a dose of approximately 80 μM, CAPE generally inhibits the activated nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) and other transcription factors via suppressing their binding with DNA [15]. The objective in writing this review article was to summarize various published studies on the therapeutics of CAPE in inflammation and cancer, especially focusing on their molecular targets that are responsible for therapeutic effect of CAPE.

2. Literature search methodology

An extensive literature search in English was conducted, using various electronic databases including Medline (1966–2014) and EMBASE (1980–2014). An initial search was made using terms caffeic acid phenethyl ester and activity jointly. Then, other terms such as inflammation, cancer, and molecular targets were combined with caffeic acid phenethyl ester and activity for an advanced search. The literature investigation was done by assessing the bibliography of the selected publications showing original research to make a quality review article.

3. Results and discussion

There are many studies in the literature that elaborate the anti-inflammatory activity of CAPE [18,19]. Moreover, CAPE-induced inhibition of normal cell transformation to the neoplastic cell has also been reported [20,21]. Table 1 [20,22-32] elaborates the dose (μM) or concentration causing 50% growth inhibition (μM) of CAPE effective in different cancer cell-lines. In addition, CAPE selectively destroys the cancerous cells leaving noncancer cells unaffected as observed in human immortal lung fibroblast WI-38 cells [29].
Table 1

The dose or concentration causing 50% growth inhibition (IC50) of CAPE effective in different cancer cell-lines.

No.Types of cancer and their cell linesDose (μM)IC50 (μM)Refs
1U973 myeloid leukemia cells0.4–53[22]
2GNM neck metastasis of Gingiva carcinoma25–200[23]
3TSCC tongue squamous carcinoma cells25–200[23]
4Daoy medulloblastoma cells1–100Lee et al 2005
5SW480 colon cancer cells9–18Wang et al 2005
6HCT116 colon cancer cells9–182[24]
7PC-3 prostate cancer cells88[25]
8HL-60 leukemia cells21[26], Chen et al 2001b
9MCF-7 breast cancer cells10–100[27]
10Meng 1 oral epidermal carcinoma cells50–200[20]
11H1299 lung cancer cells21.2Lin et al 2011
12Nalm6 lymphoma cells3.1[28]
13Farage lymphoma cells2.0[28]
14Pfeiffer lymphoma cells1.2[28]
15Ramos lymphoma cells4.0[28]
16HDMAR lymphoma cells2.1[28]
17HT-1080 fibrosarcoma cells9.5[29]
18HeLa cervical cancer cells2.4[29]
19CT26 colon cancer cells35.0[30]
20A549 lung cancer cells20.9[29,31]
These studies hypothesize that CAPE inhibits the release of arachidonic acid from the cell membrane, and moreover, suppresses the gene responsible for cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression [33-36]. Moreover, CAPE suppresses NF-κB activity by limiting the formation of NF-κB DNA and nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT)-DNA complexes and thus retarding NF-κB-dependent transcription in Jurkat cells [37-42]. In 2005, Abdel-Latif et al presented anticancer and anti-inflammatory activities of CAPE in a gastric epithelial cell line, claiming that CAPE inhibits the production of tissue necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin (IL)-8; it eventually retards the expression of NF-κB, AP-1, and COX-2 [43]. It is noteworthy to mention here that CAPE does not influence other tissues of body, and thus the usage of this natural anticancer agent is free of side effects with effective chemopreventive feature [44-47]. This outcome elaborates the nutritional importance of CAPE, particularly for patients whose tumors express gradually elevated levels of above given activated transcription factors. Lipopolysaccharide-mediated inflammation in human neutrophils has also been combated using CAPE which suppresses the synthesis of TNF-α and IL-6 [48]. The same authors also found that CAPE attenuates the phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 and c-JunN-terminal kinase [48]. Raso et al [49] found that CAPE has potential for reducing inflammation through inhibiting IL-2 gene in activated T-cells that are normally the source of inflammation [34]. Biological studies have also revealed the activity of CAPE against angiogenesis, tumor invasion, metastasis, proliferation, and apoptosis in different cancers such as human pancreatic and colon cancer [23,35,44,50-55]. The improvement in the viability of colon adenocarcinoma cells (CT26) has been noted in a dose-dependent manner when these cells are treated with CAPE [30]. This cytotoxic effect of CAPE has been attributed to the reduced expression of matrix metalloproteinase and synthesis of vascular endothelial growth factor under the effect of CAPE. In this way, this chemical activity obstructs the angiogenesis and metastasis [56-62]. CAPE can suppress apoptosis via inhibiting the activated NF-kB [26], Bak [63], Bcl-2-associated X protein (Bax) [31,63-65], p53 [25,27,63], extracellular signal-regulated kinase [63], c-Jun and p21ap [27], c-JunN-terminal kinase and Fas ligand [65], p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38 MAPK) [25,63], and caspase activity [27,31,63,64]. Moreover, upregulation of Bel-2 [29,66], the cellular inhibitor of apoptosis proteins 1 and 2, and X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein [26,31], release of cytochrome C [63,64], loss of mitochondrial transmembrane potential [27], and decrease in Mcl-1 [21,27] by CAPE are also responsible for its antiapoptotic effect. In many cancer cells, CAPE-mediated-cell cycle arrest has been reported through the suppression of various factors including cyclin B1 [28,29]. CAPE-induced necrosis has also been described [22]. In addition, suppression of Akt phosphorylation is also induced by CAPE, resulting in the inhibition of cancer cell invasiveness [24]. The literature also contains many animal studies that reveal the inhibitory role of CAPE on tumor growth and metastasis. For example, at a dietary level of 0.15% CAPE, C57BL/6J-Min/+mice having a germ-line mutation exhibit 63% suppression in tumor growth through increased apoptosis and cell proliferation [67]. At a dose of 50 mg/kg, CAPE-treated rats showed the emergence of colon–rectal carcinoma provoked by azoxymethane [44]. In addition, mice with C6 glioma xenografts have exhibited dose-dependent inhibition in tumor metastasis at 1–10 mg intraperitoneal dose of CAPE/kg/ day [21]. As far as mechanisms of anticancer activity of CAPE are concerned, CAPE is capable of affecting various processes [32,42,46,60,68-73] as summarized in Fig. 2.
Fig. 2

Various modes of anticancer activities of caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE).

Through numerous experimental studies, the therapeutic potentials of CAPE against various cancers have been explored. The findings of those studies are summarized below and the possible target sites of CAPE action are also described. In response to a stimulus such as tissue damage, inflammation develops. It is a physiologic phenomenon that may contribute to cancer development through various intermediates (Fig. 3) [74]. Key modulators, which drive inflammation to cancer, include various transcription factors such as NF-κB, TNF-α, IL-6, COX-2, Nrf2, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), NFAT, hypoxia-inducible factor-1α, and signal transducers and activators of transcription [74].
Fig. 3

A summary of linkage between inflammation and cancer development. Tissue necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin (IL)-1, hypoxia-inducible factor-1a (HIF-1a), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), modified citrus pectins (MCPs), endothelial growth factor (EGF), nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT), signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), vascular cell adhesion molecules (VCAMs), intercellular adhesion molecules (ICAMs), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), nitric oxide (NO).

The cytoplasm of all nondiseased B cells contains inactive NF-κB factor [75]. NF-κB is a collective term referring to proinflammatory heterotrimer transcription factors, a family of five proteins having Rel-domain. These proteins, including NF-κB1 (or p50), NF-κB2 (or p52), Rel A (or p65), Rel B, and c-Rel, remain inactive under the influence of IκBα, IκBβ, IκBγ, IκBαɛ, bcl-3, p105, and p100 proteins that have the anchoring domain [76]. In tumor cells, as well as proliferating thymocytes, monocytes, astrocytes, T cells, and B cells, NF-κB is reported to be activated after phosphorylation and removal of IκBα by IκBα kinase (IKK; Fig. 4). The IKK family consists of three enzymes (IKKα, IKKβ, and IKKγ), of which, IKKβ is proposed to be involved in NF-κB activation by cytokines (tissue necrosis factor, IL-6, growth factors, and differentiation factors) and many other carcinogens and tumor promoters [76-78]. Shishodia et al [79] demonstrated tissue necrosis factor as the strongest NF-κB activator, under the influence of which tumor cells proliferate, invade, metastasize, and suppress apoptosis. Matrix metalloproteinases, urokinase type of plasminogen activator, and IL-8 are examples of NF-κB-regulated gene products that regulate the invasion of tumor cells [79-82]. Metastasis of tumor cells is regulated by NF-κB and is mediated through the expression of different adhesion molecules, including intercellular adhesion molecule-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, endothelium leukocyte adhesion molecule-1, and iNOS [83,84].
Fig. 4

An illustrative summary of the nuclear factor (NF)-κB activation route.

Immediately after activation, translocation of NF-κB occurs from the cytoplasm to the nucleus of the cell followed by the binding of NF-κB to its particular harmonized site consisting of 10 base pairs, GGGPuNNPyPyCC [85,86]. The active NF-κB, in normal physiology, controls the expression of many genes that regulate the immune, growth, and inflammation features of cell. By contrast, the excessive and improper activation of NF-κB can intervene inflammation and tumorigenesis. In addition, NF-κB acts as a linkage between inflammation and cancer remembering that cancer is a proinflammatory disease [45,87]. Thus, activation of NF-κB by any inflammatory agents can produce inflammation that is mediated through adhesion molecules, such as intercellular adhesion molecule-1 [88]. Similarly, suppression of NF-κB by any anti-inflammatory agents can reduce inflammation and proliferation causing cell cycle arrest, eventually leading to apoptosis [45]. The microenvironment of tumors, as well as different inflammatory agents, carcinogens, and tumor promoters may activate the NF-κB [76]. There are some members of the NF-κB group that are oncogenic in nature and can intervene their effects by activating NF-κB [76,89]. Various stimuli, such as lipopolysaccharide, proin-flammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-1 and tissue necrosis factor), and growth factors (e.g., epidermal growth factor), have been found to be involved in expression of COX-2, which acts on arachidonic acids and produces prostaglandins, the crucial mediators of inflammation. Moreover, COX-2 is overexpressed in cancer [74,90,91]. Various antioxidant genes are regulated by Nrf2's role in inflammation; this effect of Nrf2 can be attributed to the involvement of prostaglandins and/or NO leading to the diminished susceptibility to apoptotic factors including TNF-α. Nrf2 is reported to exhibit protection against DNA damage and carcinogenesis [92,93]. Likewise, iNOS, an enzyme that catalyzes the production of NO, is also over-expressed in inflammation and cancer [29,94,95]. In addition, NFAT is proposed to play a crucial role in inflammatory responses through the expression of various proinflammatory cytokines, including IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, and TNF-α. NFAT is involved in COX-2 expression induced by TNF-α [96,97]. By contrast, inflammation is always accompanied by hypoxia due to metabolic shifts during inflammation. In response to hypoxia, hypoxia-inducible factor-1α, a hetero-dimeric transcription factor, activates various molecules including erythropoietin, iNOS, vascular endothelial growth factor, and glucose transporter-1 [98-100]. Signal transducers and activators of transcription factors are also activated by various cytokines in inflammation and cancer [29].

4. Conclusion

This literature mining study revealed anti-inflammatory and anticancer activities of CAPE. The possible molecular targets for the action of CAPE in inflammation and cancer include various transcription factors such as NF-κB. Based on the valuable data about the above presented bioactivities, clinical studies of CAPE should be conducted to explore its toxicities, if any.
  95 in total

Review 1.  Biological activity of bee propolis in health and disease.

Authors:  Mahmoud Lotfy Khalil
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2006 Jan-Mar

2.  Antiproliferation and radiosensitization of caffeic acid phenethyl ester on human medulloblastoma cells.

Authors:  Yi-Hsien Lin; Jen-Hwey Chiu; Wen-Ser Tseng; Tai-Tong Wong; Shih-Hwa Chiou; Sang-Hue Yen
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2005-09-20       Impact factor: 3.333

3.  The metabolic bioactivation of caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) mediated by tyrosinase selectively inhibits glutathione S-transferase.

Authors:  Shashi K Kudugunti; Helen Thorsheim; Mohammad S Yousef; Lan Guan; Majid Y Moridani
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 5.192

4.  Expression and function of the nuclear factor of activated T cells in colon carcinoma cells: involvement in the regulation of cyclooxygenase-2.

Authors:  Javier Duque; Manuel Fresno; Miguel A Iñiguez
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-01-04       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Optimization of ultrasound-accelerated synthesis of enzymatic caffeic acid phenethyl ester by response surface methodology.

Authors:  Hsiao-Ching Chen; Jiann-Hwa Chen; Cheng Chang; Chwen-Jen Shieh
Journal:  Ultrason Sonochem       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 7.491

6.  The transcription factor NRF2 protects against pulmonary fibrosis.

Authors:  Hye-Youn Cho; Sekhar P M Reddy; Masayuki Yamamoto; Steven R Kleeberger
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2004-06-18       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Caffeic acid phenethyl ester inhibits T-cell activation by targeting both nuclear factor of activated T-cells and NF-kappaB transcription factors.

Authors:  Nieves Márquez; Rocío Sancho; Antonio Macho; Marco A Calzado; Bernd L Fiebich; Eduardo Muñoz
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 4.030

8.  Synergistic upregulation of metalloproteinase-9 by growth factors and inflammatory cytokines: an absolute requirement for transcription factor NF-kappa B.

Authors:  M Bond; R P Fabunmi; A H Baker; A C Newby
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  1998-09-11       Impact factor: 4.124

9.  Pharmacokinetics of caffeic acid phenethyl ester and its catechol-ring fluorinated derivative following intravenous administration to rats.

Authors:  Xinyu Wang; Jihai Pang; Jacqueline A Maffucci; Devendra S Pade; Robert A Newman; Sean M Kerwin; Phillip D Bowman; Salomon Stavchansky
Journal:  Biopharm Drug Dispos       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.627

10.  Apoptotic effect of caffeic acid phenethyl ester and its ester and amide analogues in human cervical cancer ME180 cells.

Authors:  Mei-Whey Hung; Ming-Shi Shiao; Lai-Chen Tsai; Gu-Gang Chang; Tsu-Chung Chang
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.480

View more
  17 in total

1.  Phytophospholipid Complex of Caffeic Acid: Development, In vitro Characterization, and In Vivo Investigation of Antihyperlipidemic and Hepatoprotective Action in Rats.

Authors:  Shubhada Mangrulkar; Pranav Shah; Sonali Navnage; Priyanka Mazumdar; Dinesh Chaple
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.246

2.  Antioxidant effect of caffeic acid phenethyl ester in experimentally induced periodontitis.

Authors:  Feyza Otan Özden; Müge Lütfioğlu; Esra Demir; Birşen Bilgici
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 3.  An Insight into Anticancer Effect of Propolis and Its Constituents: A Review of Molecular Mechanisms.

Authors:  Perumal Elumalai; Natarajan Muninathan; Sadhasivan T Megalatha; Arumugam Suresh; Kalimuthu Senthil Kumar; Nathan Jhansi; Kuppuswamy Kalaivani; Gunasekaran Krishnamoorthy
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Induction of Cell Cycle Arrest and Apoptotic Response of Head and Neck Squamous Carcinoma Cells (Detroit 562) by Caffeic Acid and Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester Derivative.

Authors:  Arkadiusz Dziedzic; Robert Kubina; Agata Kabała-Dzik; Marta Tanasiewicz
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 5.  Phytotherapeutics: The Emerging Role of Intestinal and Hepatocellular Transporters in Drug Interactions with Botanical Supplements.

Authors:  Ghulam Murtaza; Naveed Ullah; Farah Mukhtar; Shamyla Nawazish; Saiqa Muneer
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-10-21       Impact factor: 4.411

6.  Defensive impact of propolis against CCl4 actuated rats' testicular damage.

Authors:  Aml S Hashem
Journal:  J Adv Vet Anim Res       Date:  2021-03-05

Review 7.  Therapeutic Effects and Safe Uses of Plant-Derived Polyphenolic Compounds in Cardiovascular Diseases: A Review.

Authors:  Badriyah Shadid Alotaibi; Munazza Ijaz; Manal Buabeid; Zelal Jaber Kharaba; Hafiza Sidra Yaseen; Ghulam Murtaza
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2021-11-20       Impact factor: 4.162

Review 8.  Targeting the JAK/STAT Signaling Pathway Using Phytocompounds for Cancer Prevention and Therapy.

Authors:  Sankhadip Bose; Sabyasachi Banerjee; Arijit Mondal; Utsab Chakraborty; Joshua Pumarol; Courtney R Croley; Anupam Bishayee
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 9.  A comprehensive insight into the molecular and cellular mechanisms of the effects of Propolis on preserving renal function: a systematic review.

Authors:  Paniz Anvarifard; Maryam Anbari; Alireza Ostadrahimi; Mohammadreza Ardalan; Zohreh Ghoreishi
Journal:  Nutr Metab (Lond)       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.169

10.  Neuroprotective Potential of Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester (CAPE) in CNS Disorders: Mechanistic and Therapeutic Insights.

Authors:  Namrata Pramod Kulkarni; Bhupesh Vaidya; Acharan S Narula; Shyam Sunder Sharma
Journal:  Curr Neuropharmacol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 7.363

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.