| Literature DB >> 28911408 |
Wen-Si Zhong1, Ting Ren2, Li-Jiao Zhao2.
Abstract
The contents of lead, cadmium, chromium, copper, and nickel were determined in 25 tea samples from China, including green, yellow, white, oolong, black, Pu'er, and jasmine tea products, using high-resolution continuum source graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. The methods used for sample preparation, digestion, and quantificational analysis were established, generating satisfactory analytical precisions (represented by relative standard deviations ranging from 0.6% to 2.5%) and recoveries (98.91-101.32%). The lead contents in tea leaves were 0.48-10.57 mg/kg, and 80% of these values were below the maximum values stated by the guidelines in China. The contents of cadmium and chromium ranged from 0.01 mg/kg to 0.39 mg/kg and from 0.27 mg/kg to 2.45 mg/kg, respectively, remaining in compliance with the limits stipulated by China's Ministry of Agriculture. The copper contents were 7.73-63.71 mg/kg; only 64% of these values complied with the standards stipulated by the Ministry of Agriculture. The nickel contents ranged from 2.70 mg/kg to 13.41 mg/kg. Consequently, more attention must be paid to the risks of heavy metal contamination in tea. The quantitative method established in this work lays a foundation for preventing heavy metal toxicity in human from drinking tea and will help establish regulations to control the contents of heavy metals in tea.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese tea; continuum source graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry; heavy metals; quantitative analysis
Year: 2015 PMID: 28911408 PMCID: PMC9345429 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfda.2015.04.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Food Drug Anal Impact factor: 6.157
Heating program for the graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry analysis of lead, cadmium, chromium, copper, and nickel.
| Element | Chemical modifier | Drying (°C) | Pyrolysis (°C) | Atomization (°C) | Clean (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pb | 10 g/L NH4H2PO4 | 110 | 900 | 1500 | 2500 |
| Cd | 10 g/L NH4H2PO4 | 110 | 650 | 1400 | 2500 |
| Cr | 1 g/L Mg(NO3)2 | 110 | 1400 | 2300 | 2500 |
| Cu | 0.5 g/L Mg(NO3)2 | 110 | 1100 | 2000 | 2500 |
| Ni | 0.5 g/L Mg(NO3)2 | 110 | 1200 | 2300 | 2500 |
Cd = cadmium; Cr = chromium; Cu = copper; NH4H2PO4 = ammonium phosphate monobasic; Mg(NO3)2 = magnesium nitrate; Ni = nickel; Pb = lead.
Fig. 1Pyrolysis and atomization temperature curves for lead, cadmium, chromium, copper, and nickel. 1, no matrix modifier; 2, 3, and 4: with 2 μL, 5 μL, and 10 μL of modifier, respectively. (10 g/L NH4H2PO4 solution for Pb and Cd; 1 g/L Mg(NO3)2 solution for Cr; 0.5 g/L Mg(NO3)2 solution for Cu and Ni). Cd = cadmium; Cr = chromium; Cu = copper; Ni = nickel; Pb = lead.
Equations and correlation coefficients for the standard curves of lead, cadmium, chromium, copper, and nickel.
| Element | Equation | Fitting method | Correlation coefficient |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pb | Y = (0.0173107 + 0.0062618x)/(1 + 0.0049140x) | Nonlinear | 0.9992 |
| Y = 0.0315368 + 0.0044330x | Linear | 0.9861 | |
| Cd | Y = (0.0016850 + 0.0309467x)/(1 + 0.0282792x) | Nonlinear | 0.9981 |
| Y = 0.0100180 + 0.0240163x | Linear | 0.9911 | |
| Cr | Y = (0.0072104 + 0.0072150x)/(1 – 0.0028717x) | Nonlinear | 0.9994 |
| Y = 0.0063864 + 0.0077033x | Linear | 0.9987 | |
| Cu | Y = (0.0069972 + 0.0020622x)/(1 – 0.0006243x) | Nonlinear | 0.9997 |
| Y = 0.0037828 + 0.0023314x | Linear | 0.9964 | |
| Ni | Y = (0.0017610 + 0.0034749x)/(1 + 0.0024445x) | Nonlinear | 0.9999 |
| Y = 0.0069248 + 0.0029018x | Linear | 0.9960 |
Cd = cadmium; Cr = chromium; Cu = copper; Ni = nickel; Pb = lead.
Fig. 2The nonlinear standard curves for lead, cadmium, chromium, copper, and nickel. Cd = cadmium; Cr = chromium; Cu = copper; Ni = nickel; Pb = lead.
Repeatability of the lead, cadmium, chromium, copper, and nickel determinations.
| Element | Added | Determined (μg/L) | Recovery (%) | RSD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pb | 0 | 8.34 | — | 4.3 |
| 20 | 28.14 | 99.3 | 3.2 | |
| 40 | 46.99 | 97.2 | 1.7 | |
| 60 | 69.09 | 101.1 | 2.9 | |
| Cd | 0 | 0.16 | — | 6.5 |
| 0.2 | 0.35 | 98.4 | 5.7 | |
| 0.4 | 0.55 | 99.0 | 1.8 | |
| 0.6 | 0.74 | 97.7 | 4.4 | |
| Cr | 0 | 6.57 | — | 4.8 |
| 2 | 8.77 | 102.3 | 3.7 | |
| 4 | 10.40 | 98.4 | 2.6 | |
| 6 | 12.46 | 99.1 | 3.4 | |
| Cu | 0 | 77.93 | — | 3.6 |
| 20 | 101.95 | 104.1 | 6.2 | |
| 40 | 119.70 | 101.5 | 4.4 | |
| 60 | 136.14 | 98.7 | 2.4 | |
| Ni | 0 | 23.95 | — | 5.2 |
| 10 | 32.83 | 96.7 | 4.2 | |
| 20 | 42.85 | 97.5 | 3.7 | |
| 30 | 52.98 | 98.2 | 2.6 |
Cd = cadmium; Cr = chromium; Cu = copper; Ni = nickel; Pb = lead.
Four quality control samples were prepared by adding various amounts (0 μL, 10 μL, 20 μL, and 30 μL) of the standard solution mixtures (containing 100 mg/L Pb, 1 mg/L Cd, 10 mg/L Cr, 100 mg/L Cu and 50 mg/L Ni) to quadruplication of tea sample 12 (0.25 g for each), respectively.
RSD: relative standard deviation.
Recovery and RSD for the determinations of lead, cadmium, chromium, copper, and nickel (n = 4).
| Reference material | Elements | Certified value (mg/kg) | Determined (mg/kg) |
|---|---|---|---|
| GBW 10052 green tea | Pb | 1.6 ± 0.2 | 1.61 ± 0.13 |
| Cd | 0.076 ± 0.004 | 0.077 ± 0.004 | |
| Cr | 0.92 ± 0.20 | 0.91 ± 0.01 | |
| Cu | 24 ± 1 | 23.83 ± 0.56 | |
| Ni | 5.4 ± 0.4 | 5.36 ± 0.10 |
Cd = cadmium; Cr = chromium; Cu = copper; Ni = nickel; Pb = lead; RSD = relative standard deviation.
Fig. 3Lead, cadmium, chromium, copper, and nickel contents in tea samples determined with high-resolution continuum source-graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. Cd = cadmium; Cr = chromium; Cu = copper; Ni = nickel; Pb = lead.
Fig. 4Distribution of the lead, cadmium, chromium, copper, and nickel contents in the seven types of tea. Cd = cadmium; Cr = chromium; Cu = copper; Ni = nickel; Pb = lead.