K A Alderisio1, L F Villegas2, M W Ware3, L A McDonald1, L Xiao4, E N Villegas3. 1. New York City Department of Environmental Protection, Valhalla and Kingston, NY, USA. 2. CB&I Federal Services, Inc., Cincinnati, OH, USA. 3. National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH, USA. 4. National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Abstract
AIM: USEPA Method 1623, or its equivalent, is currently used to monitor for protozoan contamination of surface drinking water sources worldwide. At least three approved staining kits used for detecting Cryptosporidium and Giardia are commercially available. This study focuses on understanding the differences among staining kits used for Method 1623. METHODS AND RESULTS: Merifluor and EasyStain labelling kits were used to monitor Cryptosporidium oocyst and Giardia cyst densities in New York City's raw surface water sources. In the year following a change to the approved staining kits for use with Method 1623, an anomaly was noted in the occurrence of Giardia cysts in New York City's raw surface water. Specifically, Merifluor-stained samples had higher Giardia cyst densities as compared with those stained with EasyStain. Side by side comparison revealed significantly lower fluorescence intensities of Giardia muris as compared with Giardia duodenalis cysts when labelled with EasyStain. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed very poor fluorescence intensity signals by EasyStain on G. muris cysts resulting in lower cyst counts, while Merifluor, with its broader Giardia cyst staining specificity, resulted in higher cyst counts, when using Methods 1623. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: These results suggest that detected Giardia cyst concentrations are dependent on the staining kits used, which can result in a more or less conservative estimation of occurrences and densities of zoonotic Giardia cysts by detecting a broader range of Giardia species/Assemblages. Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
AIM: USEPA Method 1623, or its equivalent, is currently used to monitor for protozoan contamination of surface drinking water sources worldwide. At least three approved staining kits used for detecting Cryptosporidium and Giardia are commercially available. This study focuses on understanding the differences among staining kits used for Method 1623. METHODS AND RESULTS: Merifluor and EasyStain labelling kits were used to monitor Cryptosporidium oocyst and Giardia cyst densities in New York City's raw surface water sources. In the year following a change to the approved staining kits for use with Method 1623, an anomaly was noted in the occurrence of Giardia cysts in New York City's raw surface water. Specifically, Merifluor-stained samples had higher Giardia cyst densities as compared with those stained with EasyStain. Side by side comparison revealed significantly lower fluorescence intensities of Giardia muris as compared with Giardia duodenalis cysts when labelled with EasyStain. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed very poor fluorescence intensity signals by EasyStain on G. muris cysts resulting in lower cyst counts, while Merifluor, with its broader Giardia cyst staining specificity, resulted in higher cyst counts, when using Methods 1623. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: These results suggest that detected Giardia cyst concentrations are dependent on the staining kits used, which can result in a more or less conservative estimation of occurrences and densities of zoonotic Giardia cysts by detecting a broader range of Giardia species/Assemblages. Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
Entities:
Keywords:
zzm321990Giardiazzm321990; LT2; drinking water; protozoa; water quality
Authors: William Checkley; A Clinton White; Devan Jaganath; Michael J Arrowood; Rachel M Chalmers; Xian-Ming Chen; Ronald Fayer; Jeffrey K Griffiths; Richard L Guerrant; Lizbeth Hedstrom; Christopher D Huston; Karen L Kotloff; Gagandeep Kang; Jan R Mead; Mark Miller; William A Petri; Jeffrey W Priest; David S Roos; Boris Striepen; R C Andrew Thompson; Honorine D Ward; Wesley A Van Voorhis; Lihua Xiao; Guan Zhu; Eric R Houpt Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2014-09-29 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: D Kostopoulou; S Casaert; N Tzanidakis; D van Doorn; J Demeler; G von Samson-Himmelstjerna; A Saratsis; N Voutzourakis; A Ehsan; T Doornaert; M Looijen; N De Wilde; S Sotiraki; E Claerebout; T Geurden Journal: Vet Parasitol Date: 2015-04-27 Impact factor: 2.738