| Literature DB >> 28906433 |
Peipei Zhang1, Mandeep Kaur2, John P Bowman3, David A Ratkowsky4, Mark Tamplin5.
Abstract
Carnobacterium maltaromaticum is frequently associated with foods having extended shelf-life due to its inhibitory activity to other bacteria. The quantification of such inhibition interactions affected by various environmental factors is limited. This study investigated the effect of environmental factors relevant to vacuum-packaged beef on inhibition between two model isolates of C. maltaromaticum, D0h and D8c, specifically D8c sensitivity to D0h inhibition and D0h inhibitor production. The effects of temperature (-1, 7, 15, 25 °C), atmosphere (aerobic and anaerobic), pH (5.5, 6, 6.5), lactic acid (0, 25, 50 mM) and glucose (0, 0.56, 5.55 mM) on D8c sensitivity (diameter of an inhibition zone) were measured. The effects of pH, glucose, lactic acid and atmosphere on D0h inhibitor production were measured at 25 °C. Sensitivity of D8c was the highest at 15 °C, under aerobic atmosphere, at higher concentrations of undissociated lactic acid and glucose, and at pH 5.5 (p < 0.001). pH significantly affected D0h inhibitor production (p < 0.001), which was the highest at pH 6.5. The effect of lactic acid depended upon pH level; at relatively low pH (5.5), lactic acid decreased the production rate (arbitrary inhibition unit (AU)/mL/h). This study provides a quantitative description of intra-species interactions, studied in in vitro environments that are relevant to vacuum-packaged beef.Entities:
Keywords: Carnobacterium maltaromaticum; atmosphere; bacterial interactions; glucose; inhibitory activity; intra-specific; lactic acid; pH; temperature; vacuum-packaged beef
Year: 2017 PMID: 28906433 PMCID: PMC5620650 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms5030059
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Levels of lactic acid, glucose and pH for modified brain heart infusion (mBHI) formulations.
| Medium (No.) | Lactic Acid (mM) | Glucose (mM) | pH | UndisLA (mM) 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 5.5 | 0 |
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 6.5 | 0 |
| 4 | 25 | 0 | 5.5 | 0.56 |
| 5 | 25 | 0 | 6 | 0.18 |
| 6 | 25 | 0 | 6.5 | 0.06 |
| 7 | 50 | 0 | 5.5 | 1.12 |
| 8 | 50 | 0 | 6 | 0.36 |
| 9 | 50 | 0 | 6.5 | 0.11 |
| 10 | 0 | 0.56 | 5.5 | 0 |
| 11 | 0 | 0.56 | 6 | 0 |
| 12 | 0 | 0.56 | 6.5 | 0 |
| 13 | 25 | 0.56 | 5.5 | 0.56 |
| 14 | 25 | 0.56 | 6 | 0.18 |
| 15 | 25 | 0.56 | 6.5 | 0.06 |
| 16 | 50 | 0.56 | 5.5 | 1.12 |
| 17 | 50 | 0.56 | 6 | 0.36 |
| 18 | 50 | 0.56 | 6.5 | 0.11 |
| 19 | 0 | 5.55 | 5.5 | 0 |
| 20 | 0 | 5.55 | 6 | 0 |
| 21 | 0 | 5.55 | 6.5 | 0 |
| 22 | 25 | 5.55 | 5.5 | 0.56 |
| 23 | 25 | 5.55 | 6 | 0.18 |
| 24 | 25 | 5.55 | 6.5 | 0.06 |
| 25 | 50 | 5.55 | 5.5 | 1.12 |
| 26 | 50 | 5.55 | 6 | 0.36 |
| 27 | 50 | 5.55 | 6.5 | 0.11 |
1 UndisLA, the undissociated form of lactic acid (Materials and Methods, Section 2.3).
Figure 1Kinetics of inhibitory compound production by C. maltaromaticum D0h. DI, diameter of inhibition zone.
Incubation conditions for DI measurement.
| Temperature (°C) | Atmosphere | Medium No. 1 | Incubation Time (Days) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aerobic | Anaerobic | |||
| 25 | + | + | 1–27 | 10 |
| 15 | + | + | 1–27 | 19 |
| 7 | + | + | 1–27 | 45 |
| −1 | + | + | 1–3, 5, 6, 8–12, 14, 15, 17–21, 23, 24, 26, 27 | 145 |
| −1 | + | + | 13 | 263 |
| −1 | + | 4, 16, 22 | 263 | |
| −1 | + | + | 7, 25 | NG 2 |
| −1 | + | 4, 16, 22 | NG | |
1 Medium No. is described in Table 1. 2 NG, no visible growth of target bacterium was observed; diameter of inhibition zone not measured.
Figure 2Effect of pH and lactic acid on inhibitor production (AU/mL/h) by C. maltaromaticum D0h. In (A,B), the error bar represents the standard error of the mean; means with the same letters are not significantly different. In (B), means having the same level of pH, but differing amounts of total lactic acid were compared. (C) shows the production rates achieved from all culture conditions and grouped according to the calculated amount of undissociated lactic acid.
Figure 3Effect of environmental factors on the diameter of inhibition zone (DI). (A) Temperature; (B) Atmosphere (aerobic vs. anaerobic); (C) Glucose; (D) Lactic acid; (E) pH. The error bar represents the standard error of the mean. Means with the same letter in each panel are not significantly different.
Figure 4Effects of interactions among environmental factors on the diameter of inhibition zone (DI). In (A,E), Aerob signifies aerobic atmosphere; Anaerob signifies anaerobic atmosphere. The two-factor interactions shown in (A–D,F,G) were significant (F-test, p < 0.05). The interaction shown in (E) was not statistically significant (p = 0.055). (H) shows a linear regression between DI and undissociated lactic acid. Error bars are the standard error of the mean. Means within the same level of the factor shown on the x-axis were compared, and different letters indicate significant differences.