| Literature DB >> 28903549 |
Eun Sang Yi1,2, Young Bae Choi3, Rihwa Choi4, Na Hee Lee5, Ji Won Lee1, Keon Hee Yoo1, Ki Woong Sung1, Soo-Youn Lee4, Hong Hoe Koo1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We aimed to identify the impact of NUDT15 variants on thiopurine intolerance and 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN) levels in Korean children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).Entities:
Keywords: 6-Mercaptopurine; 6-Thioguanylic acid; Leukemia; Thiopurine; NUDT15
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28903549 PMCID: PMC6056957 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2017.283
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Res Treat ISSN: 1598-2998 Impact factor: 4.679
Fig. 1.Study population. Patients were classified into normal-, intermediate-, low-activity groups according to the number of variant alleles. 6-MP, 6-mercaptopurine; HCT, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; TPMT, thiopurine S-methyltransferase.
Allele frequency in the study population
| Genetic variant | Protein variant | Proportion (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| *1 | Wild-type | Wild-type | 85.5 |
| *2 | c.[36_37insGGAGTC; c.415C>T] | p.Val18_Val19insGlyVal/p.Arg139Cys | 5.2 |
| *3 | c.415C>T | p.Arg139Cys | 7.9 |
| *4 | c.416G>A | p.Arg139His | 0.2 |
| *5 | c.52G>A | p.Val18Ile | 0.8 |
| *6 | c.36_37insGGAGTC | p.Val18_Val19insGlyVal | 0.4 |
Composition of NUDT15 diplotypes in the study population
| Diplotype | No. of patients (n=258) | Proportion (%) |
|---|---|---|
| *1/*1 | 190 | 73.6 |
| *1/*2 | 22 | 8.5 |
| *1/*3 | 33 | 12.8 |
| *1/*5 | 4 | 1.6 |
| *1/*6 | 2 | 0.8 |
| *2/*3 | 4 | 1.6 |
| *2/*4 | 1 | 0.4 |
| *3/*3 | 2 | 0.8 |
Characteristics of the study patients and composition of diplotypes
| All patients (n=182) | Normal-activity group (n=131) | Intermediate-activity group (n=46) | Low-activity group (n=5) | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| At diagnosis | 5.2 (1.1-21.3) | 5.2 (1.1-21.3) | 4.8 (1.1-16.0) | 6.1 (3.5-13.5) | 0.53 |
| At maintenance | 6.0 (1.9-22.0) | 6.0 (1.9-22.0) | 5.7 (2.0-17.2) | 7.1 (4.6-14.8) | 0.52 |
| Female | 86 (47.3) | 61 (46.6) | 21 (45.7) | 4 (80.0) | 0.33 |
| Male | 96 (52.7) | 70 (53.4) | 25 (54.3) | 1 (20.0) | |
| Standard | 117 (64.3) | 85 (64.9) | 30 (65.2) | 2 (40.0) | 0.52 |
| High | 65 (35.7) | 46 (35.1) | 16 (34.8) | 3 (60.0) | |
| < 50 | 171 (94.0) | 125 (95.4) | 41 (89.1) | 5 (100) | 0.604 |
| 50-100 | 9 (4.9) | 5 (3.8) | 4 (8.7) | - | |
| > 100 | 2 (1.1) | 1 (0.8) | 1 (2.2) | - | |
| No | 75 (41.4) | 51 (39.2) | 23 (50.0) | 1 (20.0) | 0.273 |
| Yes | 106 (58.6) | 79 (60.8) | 23 (50.0) | 4 (80.0) | |
| No | 167 (92.3) | 121 (93.1) | 41 (89.1) | 5 (100) | 0.556 |
| Yes | 14 (7.7) | 9 (6.9) | 5 (10.9) | - | |
| No | 166 (92.2) | 120 (93.0) | 43 (93.5) | 3 (60.0) | 0.28 |
| Yes | 4 (2.2) | 3 (2.3) | - | 1 (20.0) | |
| Traumatic tap | 10 (5.6) | 6 (4.7) | 3 (6.5) | 1 (20.0) | |
| B | 173 (95.1) | 125 (95.4) | 43 (93.5) | 5 (100) | 0.969 |
| T | 6 (3.3) | 4 (3.1) | 2 (4.3) | - | |
| Others | 3 (1.6) | 2 (1.5) | 1 (2.2) | - | |
| No | 66 (36.9) | 44 (34.1) | 20 (44.4) | 2 (40.0) | 0.460 |
| Yes | 113 (63.1) | 85 (65.9) | 25 (55.6) | 3 (60.0) |
Values are presented as median (range) or number of patients (%). Missing data for the following: favorable cytogenetics (n=1), unfavorable cytogenetics (n=1), CNS disease at diagnosis (n=2), and RER (n=3). ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; WBC, white blood cell; CNS, central nervous system; RER, rapid early response.
Favorable cytogenetics included ≥ 1 of the following: t(12;21), hyperdiploidy, trisomy 4 and 10, or trisomy 4, 10, and 17,
Unfavorable cytogenetics included ≥ 1 of the following: t(9;22), t(4;11), iAMP21, or hypodiploidy.
Fig. 2.Daily 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) dose and clinical features of the groups. (A) Daily 6-MP dose. (B) Therapy interruption days. (C) Incidence of febrile neutropenia.
Fig. 3.Lowest level of complete blood cell counts in the groups. (A) Lowest white blood cell (WBC) counts. (B) Lowest absolute neutrophil counts (ANCs). (C) Lowest hemoglobin (Hb) levels. (D) Lowest platelet (Plt) counts.
Fig. 4.Duration of leukopenia in the various groups. WBC, white blood cell.
Fig. 5.6-Thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN) levels and 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) doses of the study population. RBC, red blood cell.
Fig. 6.Ratio of the 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN) level to 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) dose between the groups.