| Literature DB >> 31496650 |
Ruili Wang1,2, Baogang Liu2, Jiapeng Li1, Jiamin Xu1, Xiaoling Wang1, Zhigang Zhao2, Libo Zhao1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: As a common immunosuppressive and anticancer drug, thiopurine has achieved remarkable clinical success. However, higher inter-individual dose variability and unpredictable toxicity still challenge its use in clinical practices. Some studies indicate that NUDT 15 polymorphisms are associated with this variation, but specific correlation remains controversial. This meta-analysis assessed the association between three polymorphisms of NUDT 15 and thiopurine-induced toxicities.Entities:
Keywords: NUDT 15; intolerance; leukopenia; meta-analysis; polymorphism; thiopurine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31496650 PMCID: PMC6689127 DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S210512
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Drug Des Devel Ther ISSN: 1177-8881 Impact factor: 4.162
Characteristic of published systematic reviews/meta-analyses
| Author (year) | Polymorphism | Patients | Outcomes | Search strategy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yin DD (2017) | ALL + IBD | Thiopurine-induced leukopenia | PubMed + Google Scholar + China National Knowledge Infrastructure (before 27 July 2016) | |
| Zhang AL (2017) | ALL + IBD + AIH | Thiopurine-induced leukopenia + thiopurine intolerance | PubMed + Embase + Web of Knowledge (before 10 July 2016) |
Abbreviations: A, adults; P, pediatric; ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; AIH, autoimmune hepatitis.
Figure 1Flow diagram of study.
Characteristics of included studies in the meta-analysis
| Study | Disease | Age (years) | Sample size | Ethnicity | Medication | Daily initial dosea | Outcome of study | HWE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yang JJ (2015) | ALL(P) | — | 1028 | Europeans/Africans/Hispanics/East Asians/Others | c.415C > T | 6-MP | 75 mg/m2 | Thiopurine intolerance | × |
| Tanaka Y (2015, 2017) | ALL(P) | 1–17 | 95 | Japanese | c.415C > T | 6-MP | 40 mg/m2 | Myelotoxicity and thiopurine intolerance | × |
| Liang DC (2015) | ALL(P) | 0.1–18 | 310 | Chinese (Taiwan) | c.415C > T | 6-MP | 40 mg/m2 | Thiopurine intolerance | √ |
| Moriyama T (2016) | ALL(P) | — | 270 | Guatemala/Singapore/Japan | c.415C > T | 6-MP | (5075)/50(SR/IR) 75 (HR)/50 mg/m2 | Thiopurine intolerance | √ |
| Suzuki H (2016) | ALL(P) | 5.1 (1.6–15.8) | 51 | Japanese | c.415C > T | 6-MP | 40 mg/m2 | Myelotoxicity and thiopurine intolerance | √ |
| Yang SK (2014) | CD(A + P) | 13–64 | 978 | Korean | c.415C > T | AZA | 25–50 mg | Myelotoxicity and thiopurine intolerance | √ |
| Kakuta Y(2015) | IBD(A) | 35.3±12.2 | 135 | Japanese | c.415C > T | AZA/6-MP | 0.5–1.0 mg/kg | Myelotoxicity and thiopurine intolerance | × |
| Asada A (2016) | IBD(A) | 44.1±0.89 | 161 | Japanese | c.415C > T | AZA/6-MP | 0.5–1.0 mg/kg | Myelotoxicity and thiopurine intolerance | √ |
| Chao K / Zhu X(2017/2016) | IBD(A)/CD(A) | 28 (4–68)/— | 732/253 | Chinese | c.415C > T | AZA/6-MP | — | Myelotoxicity | √ |
| Sato T (2017) | IBD(A) | 40.3 (18–74) | 149 | Japanese | c.415C > T | AZA/6-MP | 25–50 mg | Myelotoxicity and thiopurine intolerance | × |
| Lee JH (2017) | CD(A) | 33.6±8.8 | 165 | Korean | c.415C > T | AZA/6-MP | 0.5–1.0 mg/kg | Myelotoxicity | × |
| Sutiman N(2018) | IBD(A) | — | 129 | Chinese/Malay/Indian/Others | c.415C > T | AZA/6-MP | 0.5–1.0 mg/kg | Myelotoxicity | √ |
| Wang HH(2018) | IBD(A) | 33.18±11.50 | 80 | Chinese | c.415C > T | AZA | 0.5–1.5 mg/kg | Myelotoxicity | √ |
| Kim SY (2017) | MG/CIDP/NMO/Vasculitis/ | 15–84 | 84 | Korean | c.415C > T | AZA | 50 mg | Myelotoxicity and thiopurine intolerance | × |
| Tsuchiya A (2017) | RA(A) | 66±9.1 | 22 | Japanese | c.415C > T | AZA | – | Myelotoxicity and thiopurine intolerance | √ |
| Shah SA (2017) | IBD/AIH(A) | 59.5±11.6 | 69 | Indian | c.415C > T | AZA/6-MP | 50 mg | Myelotoxicity and thiopurine intolerance | √ |
Notes: —, not mentioned; √/×, genotype distribution were/were not consistent with Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium; aThiopurine dose is 6-MP-based for ALL and AZA-based for other diseases.
Abbreviations: P, pediatric; A, adult; ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; CD, Crohn’s disease; AZA, azathioprine; 6-MP, 6-mercaptopurine; MG, myasthenia gravis; CIDP, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy; NMO, neuromyelitis optica; RA, rheumatoid arthritis; AIH, autoimmune hepatitis; SR, standard risk; IR, intermediate risk; HR, high risk.
The quality of studies included in meta-analysis with the method of NOS
| Study | Selection | Comparability | Outcome | Score (total) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 | ||
| Yang JJ (2015) | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆☆ | ☆ | — | — | 7☆ |
| Tanaka Y (2015, 2017) | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆☆ | ☆ | ☆ | — | 8☆ |
| Liang DC (2015) | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | 9☆ |
| Moriyama T (2016) | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆☆ | ☆ | — | — | 7☆ |
| Suzuki H (2016) | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆☆ | ☆ | — | — | 7☆ |
| Yang SK (2014) | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | 9☆ |
| Kakuta Y (2015) | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | 9☆ |
| Asada A (2016) | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆☆ | ☆ | — | — | 7☆ |
| Chao K (2017) | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆☆ | ☆ | — | — | 7☆ |
| Sato T (2017) | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆☆ | ☆ | ☆ | — | 8☆ |
| Lee JH (2017) | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆☆ | ☆ | — | — | 7☆ |
| Sutiman N (2018) | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆☆ | ☆ | — | — | 7☆ |
| Wang HH (2018) | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆☆ | ☆ | — | — | 7☆ |
| Kim SY (2017) | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆☆ | ☆ | — | — | 8☆ |
| Tsuchiya A (2017) | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆☆ | ☆ | — | — | 7☆ |
| Shah SA (2017) | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆ | ☆☆ | ☆ | — | — | 7☆ |
Notes: —, the question has no score. One score was represented by one star. Q1: The exposed cohort was truly or somewhat representative? Q2: The non-exposed cohort was drawn from the same community as the exposed cohort? Q3: Exposure was ascertained by secure record or structured interview? Q4: Outcome of interest was not present at the start of study? Q5: On the basis of the design or analysis, cohorts had comparability? (controls for the most important factor? Controls for any additional factor?) Q6: Outcome was independent blind assessment or record linkage? Q7: Follow-up was long enough for outcomes to occur? Q8: Follow-up of cohorts was adequate? A study can be awarded a maximum of one star for each numbered item within the selection and outcome categories. A maximum of two stars can be given for comparability.
Abbreviations: NOS, Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale; Q, question.
Pooled odds ratios of the association between NUDT 15 polymorphism and thiopurine-induced toxicities
| Genotype comparison models | Toxicity | No. of studies | Subjects | Pooled OR (95% CI) | Heterogeneity test | Effect model | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC + TT vs CC | Leukopenia | 10 | 2697 | <0.00001 | 7.64 (6.19, 9.44) | 38 | 0.1 | Fixed |
| Early leukopenia | 7 | 719 | <0.0001 | 9.26 (3.35, 25.58) | 74 | 0.0008 | Random | |
| 3 | 138 | 0.0005 | 6.86 (2.32, 20.26) | 13 | 0.32 | — | ||
| 3 | 404 | <0.00001 | 20.48 (9.77, 42.91) | 0 | 0.84 | — | ||
| 1 | 177 | 0.009 | 2.28 (1.23, 4.22) | — | — | — | ||
| Late leukopenia | 7 | 719 | <0.0001 | 0.11 (0.04, 0.30) | 74 | 0.0008 | Random | |
| 3 | 138 | 0.0005 | 0.15 (0.05, 0.43) | 13 | 0.32 | — | ||
| 3 | 404 | <0.00001 | 0.05 (0.02, 0.10) | 0 | 0.84 | — | ||
| 1 | 177 | 0.009 | 0.44 (0.24, 0.81) | — | — | — | ||
| Leukopenia (G3–G4) | 5 | 612 | <0.00001 | 4.17 (2.44, 7.11) | 33 | 0.2 | Fixed | |
| Severe hair loss | 7 | 1016 | <0.00001 | 43.45 (14.51, 130.10) | 0 | 0.97 | Fixed | |
| TT vs CC + TC | Leukopenia | 10 | 2697 | <0.00001 | 29.66 (12.31, 71.46) | 0 | 0.95 | Fixed |
| Early leukopenia | 7 | 719 | <0.00001 | 49.42 (16.53, 147.76) | 0 | 0.97 | Fixed | |
| Late leukopenia | 7 | 719 | <0.00001 | 0.02 (0.01, 0.06) | 0 | 0.97 | Fixed | |
| Leukopenia (G3–G4) | 5 | 612 | <0.00001 | 43.97 (8.44, 229.00) | 49 | 0.1 | Random | |
| 4 | 266 | <0.00001 | 20.25 (6.83, 60.04) | 0 | 0.44 | Fixed | ||
| Severe hair loss | 7 | 1016 | <0.00001 | 417.50 (109.76, 1588.04) | 0 | 0.58 | Fixed | |
| TT vs CC | Leukopenia | 10 | 2191 | <0.00001 | 45.60 (18.84, 110.37) | 0 | 0.89 | Fixed |
| Early leukopenia | 7 | 441 | <0.00001 | 99.30 (29.83, 330.56) | 0 | 0.84 | Fixed | |
| Late leukopenia | 7 | 441 | <0.00001 | 0.01 (0.00, 0.03) | 0 | 0.84 | Fixed | |
| Leukopenia (G3–G4) | 5 | 370 | <0.00001 | 60.98 (21.10, 176.20) | 39 | 0.16 | Fixed | |
| Severe hair loss | 7 | 831 | <0.00001 | 656.15 (150.21, 2866.13) | 0 | 0.73 | Fixed | |
| TC vs CC | Leukopenia | 11 | 2717 | <0.00001 | 6.41 (5.19, 7.94) | 37 | 0.11 | Fixed |
| Early leukopenia | 7 | 670 | 0.001 | 5.15 (1.92, 13.81) | 69 | 0.004 | Random | |
| 3 | 125 | 0.01 | 3.96 (1.36, 11.51) | 0 | 0.41 | — | ||
| 3 | 379 | <0.00001 | 13.57 (6.34, 29.05) | 0 | 0.84 | — | ||
| 1 | 166 | 0.11 | 1.70 (0.89, 3.22) | — | — | — | ||
| Late leukopenia | 7 | 670 | 0.001 | 0.19 (0.07, 0.52) | 69 | 0.004 | Random | |
| 3 | 125 | 0.01 | 0.25 (0.09, 0.73) | 0 | 0.41 | — | ||
| 3 | 379 | <0.00001 | 0.07 (0.03, 0.16) | 0 | 0.84 | — | ||
| 1 | 166 | 0.11 | 0.59 (0.31, 1.12) | — | — | — | ||
| Leukopenia (G3–G4) | 5 | 578 | 0.01 | 2.38 (1.22, 4.64) | 0 | 0.48 | Fixed | |
| Severe hair loss | 3 | 396 | 0.0002 | 26.18 (4.73, 144.95) | 0 | 0.91 | Fixed | |
| TT vs TC | Leukopenia | 10 | 566 | <0.0001 | 6.38 (2.59, 15.72) | 0 | 0.89 | Fixed |
| Early leukopenia | 7 | 327 | <0.00001 | 23.73 (7.77, 72.46) | 0 | 0.98 | Fixed | |
| Late leukopenia | 7 | 327 | <0.00001 | 0.04 (0.01, 0.13) | 0 | 0.98 | Fixed | |
| Leukopenia (G3–G4) | 5 | 276 | <0.0001 | 28.77 (10.89, 76.03) | 46 | 0.12 | Random | |
| Severe hair loss | 7 | 215 | <0.00001 | 66.29 (17.46, 251.74) | 3 | 0.41 | Fixed | |
| c.52G > A | ||||||||
| GA vs GG | Leukopenia | 3 | 975 | 0.003 | 3.52 (1.52, 8.17) | 0 | 0.77 | Fixed |
| c.36_37insGGAGTC | ||||||||
| -/ins vs -/- | Leukopenia | 3 | 1010 | <0.00001 | 3.84 (2.50, 5.91) | 0 | 0.85 | Fixed |
Notes: Statistically significant values (P<0.05). Entries in italics represent heterogeneity analysis.
Abbreviations: CD, Crohn disease; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.
Figure 2The forest plots for the meta-analysis of association between NUDT 15 c.415C > T polymorphism and risk of leukopenia in the dominant model and co-dominant model.
Figure 3The forest plots for the meta-analysis of association between NUDT 15 c.415C > T polymorphism and risk of early leukopenia in the dominant model and co-dominant model.
Figure 4Bar plot of NUDT 15 c.415C > T genotype and the average of 6-MP/AZA among child ALL patients with 6-MP (A), and IBD patient with AZA (B) in included studies. Each bar includes data with bar height and error bar separately indicating mean and standard deviation of tolerated thiopurine dose. <7 years, the younger age group (under 7 years old); ≥7 years, the older age group (above 7 years old or older).
Abbreviations: ALL, acute lymphoblastic leukemia; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; 6-MP, 6-mercaptopurine; AZA, azathioprine.
Figure 5The forest plots for the meta-analysis of association between NUDT 15 c.415C > T polymorphism and risk of severe hair loss in the dominant model and co-dominant model.
Figure 6The forest plots for the meta-analysis of association between NUDT 15 c.52G > A polymorphism and risk of leukopenia in the co-dominant model.
Figure 7The forest plots for the meta-analysis of association between NUDT 15 c.36_37insGGAGTC polymorphism and risk of leukopenia in the co-dominant model.