Literature DB >> 28890584

Interactive Q-learning for Quantiles.

Kristin A Linn1, Eric B Laber2, Leonard A Stefanski2.   

Abstract

A dynamic treatment regime is a sequence of decision rules, each of which recommends treatment based on features of patient medical history such as past treatments and outcomes. Existing methods for estimating optimal dynamic treatment regimes from data optimize the mean of a response variable. However, the mean may not always be the most appropriate summary of performance. We derive estimators of decision rules for optimizing probabilities and quantiles computed with respect to the response distribution for two-stage, binary treatment settings. This enables estimation of dynamic treatment regimes that optimize the cumulative distribution function of the response at a prespecified point or a prespecified quantile of the response distribution such as the median. The proposed methods perform favorably in simulation experiments. We illustrate our approach with data from a sequentially randomized trial where the primary outcome is remission of depression symptoms.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dynamic Treatment Regime; Personalized Medicine; Sequential Decision Making; Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial

Year:  2017        PMID: 28890584      PMCID: PMC5586239          DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2016.1155993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc        ISSN: 0162-1459            Impact factor:   5.033


  31 in total

1.  Causal inference on quantiles with an obstetric application.

Authors:  Zhiwei Zhang; Zhen Chen; James F Troendle; Jun Zhang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  An experimental design for the development of adaptive treatment strategies.

Authors:  S A Murphy
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  A Generalization Error for Q-Learning.

Authors:  Susan A Murphy
Journal:  J Mach Learn Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.654

4.  Estimation and extrapolation of optimal treatment and testing strategies.

Authors:  James Robins; Liliana Orellana; Andrea Rotnitzky
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Estimation of treatment policies based on functional predictors.

Authors:  Ian W McKeague; Min Qian
Journal:  Stat Sin       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.261

6.  New Statistical Learning Methods for Estimating Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes.

Authors:  Ying-Qi Zhao; Donglin Zeng; Eric B Laber; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.033

7.  Sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D): rationale and design.

Authors:  A John Rush; Maurizio Fava; Stephen R Wisniewski; Philip W Lavori; Madhukar H Trivedi; Harold A Sackeim; Michael E Thase; Andrew A Nierenberg; Frederic M Quitkin; T Michael Kashner; David J Kupfer; Jerrold F Rosenbaum; Jonathan Alpert; Jonathan W Stewart; Patrick J McGrath; Melanie M Biggs; Kathy Shores-Wilson; Barry D Lebowitz; Louise Ritz; George Niederehe
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2004-02

8.  A multiple imputation strategy for sequential multiple assignment randomized trials.

Authors:  Susan M Shortreed; Eric Laber; T Scott Stroup; Joelle Pineau; Susan A Murphy
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Combining biomarkers to optimize patient treatment recommendations.

Authors:  Chaeryon Kang; Holly Janes; Ying Huang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Estimating Optimal Treatment Regimes from a Classification Perspective.

Authors:  Baqun Zhang; Anastasios A Tsiatis; Marie Davidian; Min Zhang; Eric Laber
Journal:  Stat       Date:  2012-01-01
View more
  6 in total

1.  Robust regression for optimal individualized treatment rules.

Authors:  W Xiao; H H Zhang; W Lu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Comparing cluster-level dynamic treatment regimens using sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trials: Regression estimation and sample size considerations.

Authors:  Timothy NeCamp; Amy Kilbourne; Daniel Almirall
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.021

3.  Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Michael R Kosorok; Eric B Laber
Journal:  Annu Rev Stat Appl       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 5.810

4.  A semiparametric instrumental variable approach to optimal treatment regimes under endogeneity.

Authors:  Yifan Cui; Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 5.033

5.  Performance Guarantees for Policy Learning.

Authors:  Alex Luedtke; Antoine Chambaz
Journal:  Ann I H P Probab Stat       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 1.851

6.  Estimating Dynamic Treatment Regimes in Mobile Health Using V-learning.

Authors:  Daniel J Luckett; Eric B Laber; Anna R Kahkoska; David M Maahs; Elizabeth Mayer-Davis; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 5.033

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.