Pierre-Alexandre Poletti1, Diomidis Botsikas2, Minerva Becker2, Marlise Picarra2, Olivier T Rutschmann3, Nicolas C Buchs4, Habib Zaidi2, Alexandra Platon2. 1. Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Geneva, 4 rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland. pierre-alexandre.poletti@hcuge.ch. 2. Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Geneva, 4 rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland. 3. Department of Community, Primary Care and Emergency Medicine, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. 4. Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate non-intravenously enhanced low-dose computed tomography with oral contrast (LDCT) for the assessment of pregnant women with right lower quadrant pain, when magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is not immediately available. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-eight consecutive pregnant women with acute abdominal pain were admitted in our emergency centre. Thirty-seven (27%) of them, with clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis, underwent abdominal ultrasonography (US). No further examination was recommended when US was positive for appendicitis, negative with low clinical suspicion or showed an alternative diagnosis which explained the clinical presentation. All other patients underwent LDCT (<2.5 mSv). Standard intravenously enhanced CT or MRI was performed when LDCT was indeterminate. RESULTS: Eight (22%) of 37 US exams were reported normal, 25 (67%) indeterminate, 1 (3%) positive for appendicitis, 3 (8%) positive for an alternative diagnosis. LDCT was obtained in 29 (78%) patients. It was reported positive for appendicitis in 9 (31%), for alternative diagnosis in 2 (7%), normal in 13 (45%) and indeterminate in 5 (17%). Further imaging (standard CT or MRI) showed appendicitis in 2 of these 5 patients, was truly negative in 1, indeterminate in 1 and falsely positive in 1. An appendicitis was confirmed at surgery in 12 (32%) of the 37 patients. The sensitivity and the specificity of the algorithm for appendicitis were 100% (12/12) and 92% (23/25), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed algorithm is very sensitive and specific for detection of acute appendicitis in pregnant women; it reduces the need of standard CTs when MRI is not available as second-line imaging. KEY POINTS: • In pregnant women, US is limited by an important number of indeterminate results • Low-dose CT can be used after an inconclusive US for the diagnosis of appendicitis in pregnant women • An algorithm integrating US and low-dose CT is highly sensitive and specific for appendicitis in pregnant women.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate non-intravenously enhanced low-dose computed tomography with oral contrast (LDCT) for the assessment of pregnant women with right lower quadrant pain, when magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is not immediately available. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-eight consecutive pregnant women with acute abdominal pain were admitted in our emergency centre. Thirty-seven (27%) of them, with clinical suspicion of acute appendicitis, underwent abdominal ultrasonography (US). No further examination was recommended when US was positive for appendicitis, negative with low clinical suspicion or showed an alternative diagnosis which explained the clinical presentation. All other patients underwent LDCT (<2.5 mSv). Standard intravenously enhanced CT or MRI was performed when LDCT was indeterminate. RESULTS: Eight (22%) of 37 US exams were reported normal, 25 (67%) indeterminate, 1 (3%) positive for appendicitis, 3 (8%) positive for an alternative diagnosis. LDCT was obtained in 29 (78%) patients. It was reported positive for appendicitis in 9 (31%), for alternative diagnosis in 2 (7%), normal in 13 (45%) and indeterminate in 5 (17%). Further imaging (standard CT or MRI) showed appendicitis in 2 of these 5 patients, was truly negative in 1, indeterminate in 1 and falsely positive in 1. An appendicitis was confirmed at surgery in 12 (32%) of the 37 patients. The sensitivity and the specificity of the algorithm for appendicitis were 100% (12/12) and 92% (23/25), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed algorithm is very sensitive and specific for detection of acute appendicitis in pregnant women; it reduces the need of standard CTs when MRI is not available as second-line imaging. KEY POINTS: • In pregnant women, US is limited by an important number of indeterminate results • Low-dose CT can be used after an inconclusive US for the diagnosis of appendicitis in pregnant women • An algorithm integrating US and low-dose CT is highly sensitive and specific for appendicitis in pregnant women.
Authors: Ivan Pedrosa; Michelle Lafornara; Pari V Pandharipande; Jeffrey D Goldsmith; Neil M Rofsky Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-03 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Ivan Pedrosa; Deborah Levine; Aimee D Eyvazzadeh; Bettina Siewert; Long Ngo; Neil M Rofsky Journal: Radiology Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Lodewijk P Cobben; Ingrid Groot; Lucien Haans; Johan G Blickman; Julien Puylaert Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Carmelita A Wallace; Maxim S Petrov; David I Soybel; Stephen J Ferzoco; Stanley W Ashley; Ali Tavakkolizadeh Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2007-10-26 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Marcia L McGory; David S Zingmond; Areti Tillou; Jonathan R Hiatt; Clifford Y Ko; Henry M Cryer Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2007-08-23 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Camila Lopes Vendrami; Xinchun Xu; Robert J McCarthy; Joon Soo Shin; Lori A Goodhartz; Jeanne M Horowitz; Donald Kim; Frank H Miller Journal: Abdom Radiol (NY) Date: 2020-06-08
Authors: Rebecca L Bracken; John B Harringa; B Keegan Markhardt; Newrhee Kim; John K Park; Douglas R Kitchin; Jessica B Robbins; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Jen Birstler; Michael J Ryan; Ly Hoang; Perry J Pickhardt; Scott B Reeder; Michael D Repplinger Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2021-07-16 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Martina Caruso; Giuseppina Dell'Aversano Orabona; Marco Di Serafino; Francesca Iacobellis; Francesco Verde; Dario Grimaldi; Vittorio Sabatino; Chiara Rinaldo; Maria Laura Schillirò; Luigia Romano Journal: Diagnostics (Basel) Date: 2022-03-05