Literature DB >> 28883783

Performing Arm-Based Network Meta-Analysis in R with the pcnetmeta Package.

Lifeng Lin1, Jing Zhang2, James S Hodges1, Haitao Chu1.   

Abstract

Network meta-analysis is a powerful approach for synthesizing direct and indirect evidence about multiple treatment comparisons from a collection of independent studies. At present, the most widely used method in network meta-analysis is contrast-based, in which a baseline treatment needs to be specified in each study, and the analysis focuses on modeling relative treatment effects (typically log odds ratios). However, population-averaged treatment-specific parameters, such as absolute risks, cannot be estimated by this method without an external data source or a separate model for a reference treatment. Recently, an arm-based network meta-analysis method has been proposed, and the R package pcnetmeta provides user-friendly functions for its implementation. This package estimates both absolute and relative effects, and can handle binary, continuous, and count outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian inference; absolute effect; arm-based method; network meta-analysis

Year:  2017        PMID: 28883783      PMCID: PMC5584882          DOI: 10.18637/jss.v080.i05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stat Softw        ISSN: 1548-7660            Impact factor:   6.440


  36 in total

1.  Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons.

Authors:  Thomas Lumley
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Graphical methods and numerical summaries for presenting results from multiple-treatment meta-analysis: an overview and tutorial.

Authors:  Georgia Salanti; A E Ades; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 3.  Imputing variance estimates do not alter the conclusions of a meta-analysis with continuous outcomes: a case study of changes in renal function after living kidney donation.

Authors:  H Thiessen Philbrook; N Barrowman; A X Garg
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2006-10-23       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 4.  Network meta-analysis: simultaneous meta-analysis of common antiplatelet regimens after transient ischaemic attack or stroke.

Authors:  Vincent Thijs; Robin Lemmens; Steffen Fieuws
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Modeling between-trial variance structure in mixed treatment comparisons.

Authors:  Guobing Lu; Ae Ades
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2009-08-17       Impact factor: 5.899

6.  Detecting outlying trials in network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Haoda Fu; Bradley P Carlin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Fixed vs random effects meta-analysis in rare event studies: the rosiglitazone link with myocardial infarction and cardiac death.

Authors:  Jonathan J Shuster; Lynn S Jones; Daniel A Salmon
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Bayesian hierarchical models for network meta-analysis incorporating nonignorable missingness.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Haitao Chu; Hwanhee Hong; Beth A Virnig; Bradley P Carlin
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.021

9.  Sensitivity to Excluding Treatments in Network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lifeng Lin; Haitao Chu; James S Hodges
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.822

10.  Absolute or relative effects? Arm-based synthesis of trial data.

Authors:  S Dias; A E Ades
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 5.273

View more
  29 in total

1.  Borrowing of strength from indirect evidence in 40 network meta-analyses.

Authors:  Lifeng Lin; Aiwen Xing; Michael J Kofler; Mohammad Hassan Murad
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Quantifying and presenting overall evidence in network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lifeng Lin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  The impact of covariance priors on arm-based Bayesian network meta-analyses with binary outcomes.

Authors:  Zhenxun Wang; Lifeng Lin; James S Hodges; Haitao Chu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Bayesian multivariate meta-analysis of multiple factors.

Authors:  Lifeng Lin; Haitao Chu
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 5.273

5.  Pharmacological interventions for the prevention of acute kidney injury after pediatric cardiac surgery: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ioannis Bellos; Dimitrios C Iliopoulos; Despina N Perrea
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 2.801

6.  Fragility index of network meta-analysis with application to smoking cessation data.

Authors:  Aiwen Xing; Haitao Chu; Lifeng Lin
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Bayesian hierarchical methods for meta-analysis combining randomized-controlled and single-arm studies.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Chia-Wen Ko; Lei Nie; Yong Chen; Ram Tiwari
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.021

8.  A Bayesian approach to discrete multiple outcome network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca Graziani; Sergio Venturini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  On evidence cycles in network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lifeng Lin; Haitao Chu; James S Hodges
Journal:  Stat Interface       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 0.582

10.  A variance shrinkage method improves arm-based Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhenxun Wang; Lifeng Lin; James S Hodges; Richard MacLehose; Haitao Chu
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 3.021

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.