Literature DB >> 19687150

Modeling between-trial variance structure in mixed treatment comparisons.

Guobing Lu1, Ae Ades.   

Abstract

In mixed treatment comparison (MTC) meta-analysis, modeling the heterogeneity in between-trial variances across studies is a difficult problem because of the constraints on the variances inherited from the MTC structure. Starting from a consistent Bayesian hierarchical model for the mean treatment effects, we represent the variance configuration by a set of triangle inequalities on the standard deviations. We take the separation strategy (Barnard and others, 2000) to specify prior distributions for standard deviations and correlations separately. The covariance matrix of the latent treatment arm effects can be employed as a vehicle to load the triangular constraints, which in addition allows incorporation of prior beliefs about the correlations between treatment effects. The spherical parameterization based on Cholesky decomposition (Pinheiro and Bates, 1996) is used to generate a positive-definite matrix for the prior correlations in Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC). Elicited prior information on correlations between treatment arms is introduced in the form of its equivalent data likelihood. The procedure is implemented in a MCMC framework and illustrated with example data sets from medical research practice.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19687150     DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxp032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.899


  67 in total

1.  Perspective: Network Meta-analysis Reaches Nutrition Research: Current Status, Scientific Concepts, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Lukas Schwingshackl; Guido Schwarzer; Gerta Rücker; Joerg J Meerpohl
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 8.701

2.  Borrowing of strength from indirect evidence in 40 network meta-analyses.

Authors:  Lifeng Lin; Aiwen Xing; Michael J Kofler; Mohammad Hassan Murad
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Quantifying and presenting overall evidence in network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lifeng Lin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  The impact of covariance priors on arm-based Bayesian network meta-analyses with binary outcomes.

Authors:  Zhenxun Wang; Lifeng Lin; James S Hodges; Haitao Chu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  A fully Bayesian application of the Copas selection model for publication bias extended to network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dimitris Mavridis; Alex Sutton; Andrea Cipriani; Georgia Salanti
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  A Bayesian Hierarchical Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic Model for Network Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Tests.

Authors:  Qinshu Lian; James S Hodges; Haitao Chu
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 5.033

7.  Bayesian multivariate meta-analysis of multiple factors.

Authors:  Lifeng Lin; Haitao Chu
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 5.273

8.  Network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials: reporting the proper summaries.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Bradley P Carlin; James D Neaton; Guoxing G Soon; Lei Nie; Robert Kane; Beth A Virnig; Haitao Chu
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  On evidence cycles in network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lifeng Lin; Haitao Chu; James S Hodges
Journal:  Stat Interface       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 0.582

10.  A variance shrinkage method improves arm-based Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhenxun Wang; Lifeng Lin; James S Hodges; Richard MacLehose; Haitao Chu
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 3.021

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.