Literature DB >> 12210616

Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons.

Thomas Lumley1.   

Abstract

I present methods for assessing the relative effectiveness of two treatments when they have not been compared directly in a randomized trial but have each been compared to other treatments. These network meta-analysis techniques allow estimation of both heterogeneity in the effect of any given treatment and inconsistency ('incoherence') in the evidence from different pairs of treatments. A simple estimation procedure using linear mixed models is given and used in a meta-analysis of treatments for acute myocardial infarction. Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12210616     DOI: 10.1002/sim.1201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  351 in total

Review 1.  Mirtazapine versus other antidepressive agents for depression.

Authors:  Norio Watanabe; Ichiro M Omori; Atsuo Nakagawa; Andrea Cipriani; Corrado Barbui; Rachel Churchill; Toshi A Furukawa
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-12-07

2.  Translating comparative effectiveness research into clinical practice: the UK experience.

Authors:  Tom Walley
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-01-22       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  What comparative effectiveness research is needed? A framework for using guidelines and systematic reviews to identify evidence gaps and research priorities.

Authors:  Tianjing Li; S Swaroop Vedula; Roberta Scherer; Kay Dickersin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 4.  International comparison of comparative effectiveness research in five jurisdictions: insights for the US.

Authors:  Adrian R Levy; Craig Mitton; Karissa M Johnston; Brian Harrigan; Andrew H Briggs
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  No head-to-head trial? simulate the missing arms.

Authors:  J Jaime Caro; K Jack Ishak
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Do the blood pressure effects of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs influence cardiovascular morbidity and mortality?

Authors:  William J Elliott
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.369

7.  Comparative effectiveness of adjuvant treatments for resected gastric cancer: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhaolun Cai; Yiqiong Yin; Yuan Yin; Chaoyong Shen; Jian Wang; Xiaonan Yin; Zhixin Chen; Ye Zhou; Bo Zhang
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 7.370

8.  Network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials: reporting the proper summaries.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Bradley P Carlin; James D Neaton; Guoxing G Soon; Lei Nie; Robert Kane; Beth A Virnig; Haitao Chu
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  Bayesian mixed treatment comparisons meta-analysis for correlated outcomes subject to reporting bias.

Authors:  Yulun Liu; Stacia M DeSantis; Yong Chen
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 1.864

Review 10.  Differential effects of antihypertensive drugs on new-onset diabetes?

Authors:  William J Elliott
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.369

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.