Literature DB >> 25851533

Detecting outlying trials in network meta-analysis.

Jing Zhang1, Haoda Fu2, Bradley P Carlin3.   

Abstract

Network meta-analysis (NMA) expands the scope of a conventional pairwise meta-analysis to simultaneously handle multiple treatment comparisons. However, some trials may appear to deviate markedly from the others and thus be inappropriate to be synthesized in the NMA. In addition, the inclusion of these trials in evidence synthesis may lead to bias in estimation. We call such trials trial-level outliers. To the best of our knowledge, while heterogeneity and inconsistency in NMA have been extensively discussed and well addressed, few previous papers have considered the proper detection and handling of trial-level outliers. In this paper, we propose several Bayesian outlier detection measures, which are then applied to a diabetes data set. Simulation studies comparing our approaches in both arm-based and contrast-based model settings are provided in two supporting appendices.
Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  detection measures; network meta-analysis; trial-level outliers

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25851533      PMCID: PMC4496319          DOI: 10.1002/sim.6509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  20 in total

1.  Issues in performing a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stephen Senn; Francois Gavini; David Magrez; André Scheen
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Modeling between-trial variance structure in mixed treatment comparisons.

Authors:  Guobing Lu; Ae Ades
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2009-08-17       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group for Spinal Disorders.

Authors:  M W van Tulder; W J Assendelft; B W Koes; L M Bouter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Linear inference for mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis: A two-stage approach.

Authors:  Guobing Lu; Nicky J Welton; Julian P T Higgins; Ian R White; A E Ades
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 5.273

5.  Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wolfgang Viechtbauer; Mike W-L Cheung
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 5.273

6.  Bayesian indirect and mixed treatment comparisons across longitudinal time points.

Authors:  Ying Ding; Haoda Fu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  The use of two-way linear mixed models in multitreatment meta-analysis.

Authors:  H P Piepho; E R Williams; L V Madden
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Dias; N J Welton; D M Caldwell; A E Ades
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Bias modelling in evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Rebecca M Turner; David J Spiegelhalter; Gordon C S Smith; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.483

10.  A design-by-treatment interaction model for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects.

Authors:  Dan Jackson; Jessica K Barrett; Stephen Rice; Ian R White; Julian P T Higgins
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  17 in total

1.  Quantifying and presenting overall evidence in network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lifeng Lin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Bayesian hierarchical methods for meta-analysis combining randomized-controlled and single-arm studies.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Chia-Wen Ko; Lei Nie; Yong Chen; Ram Tiwari
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 3.  Comparative efficacy of mitochondrial agents for bipolar disorder during depressive episodes: a network meta-analysis using frequentist and Bayesian approaches.

Authors:  Rituparna Maiti; Archana Mishra; Biswa Ranjan Mishra; Monalisa Jena
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 4.415

4.  A variance shrinkage method improves arm-based Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhenxun Wang; Lifeng Lin; James S Hodges; Richard MacLehose; Haitao Chu
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 3.021

5.  Bayesian hierarchical models for network meta-analysis incorporating nonignorable missingness.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Haitao Chu; Hwanhee Hong; Beth A Virnig; Bradley P Carlin
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 3.021

6.  Performing Arm-Based Network Meta-Analysis in R with the pcnetmeta Package.

Authors:  Lifeng Lin; Jing Zhang; James S Hodges; Haitao Chu
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 6.440

7.  Bayesian network meta-regression hierarchical models using heavy-tailed multivariate random effects with covariate-dependent variances.

Authors:  Hao Li; Daeyoung Lim; Ming-Hui Chen; Joseph G Ibrahim; Sungduk Kim; Arvind K Shah; Jianxin Lin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  A general framework for comparative Bayesian meta-analysis of diagnostic studies.

Authors:  Joris Menten; Emmanuel Lesaffre
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Extending DerSimonian and Laird's methodology to perform network meta-analyses with random inconsistency effects.

Authors:  Dan Jackson; Martin Law; Jessica K Barrett; Rebecca Turner; Julian P T Higgins; Georgia Salanti; Ian R White
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  The Impact of Excluding Trials from Network Meta-Analyses - An Empirical Study.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Yiping Yuan; Haitao Chu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.