| Literature DB >> 28878894 |
Mariana Piatto Berton1, Rafael Medeiros de Oliveira Silva1, Elisa Peripolli1, Nedenia Bonvino Stafuzza1, Jesús Fernández Martin2, Maria Saura Álvarez2, Beatriz Villanueva Gavinã2, Miguel Angel Toro3, Georgget Banchero4, Priscila Silva Oliveira5, Joanir Pereira Eler5, Fernando Baldi1, José Bento Sterman Ferraz5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to estimate variance components and to identify genomic regions and pathways associated with resistance to gastrointestinal parasites, particularly Haemonchus contortus, in a breed of sheep adapted to tropical climate. Phenotypes evaluations were performed to verify resistance to gastrointestinal parasites, and were divided into two categories: i) farm phenotypes, assessing body condition score (BCS), degree of anemia assessed by the famacha chart (FAM), fur score (FS) and feces consistency (FC); and ii) lab phenotypes, comprising blood analyses for hematocrit (HCT), white blood cell count (WBC), red blood cell count (RBC), hemoglobin (HGB), platelets (PLT) and transformed (log10) egg per gram of feces (EPGlog). A total of 576 animals were genotyped with the Ovine SNP12k BeadChip (Illumina, Inc.), that contains 12,785 bialleleic SNP markers. The variance components were estimated using a single trait model by single step genomic BLUP procedure.Entities:
Keywords: Gwas; Linkage disequilibrium; Parasites resistance; Santa Inês breed
Year: 2017 PMID: 28878894 PMCID: PMC5584554 DOI: 10.1186/s40104-017-0190-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anim Sci Biotechnol ISSN: 1674-9782
Descriptive statistics for eggs per gram of feces (EPGlog), red blood cells (RBC), famacha (FAM), platelet (PLT), white blood cells (WBC), hematocrit (HCT), and hemoglobin (HGB)
| Trait |
| Mean | SDa | CVb, % | Min | Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPGlog | 517 | 2.57 | 0.53 | 20.6 | 1.71 | 4.04 |
| RBC, 106/μL | 513 | 9.97 | 2.12 | 21.2 | 4.39 | 19.25 |
| FAM | 518 | 3.08 | 0.97 | 31.16 | 1.0 | 5.0 |
| PLT, 103/μL | 514 | 383.8 | 241.6 | 62.9 | 8.0 | 2101.0 |
| WBC, 103/μL | 514 | 10.96 | 3.73 | 34.0 | 3.60 | 44.40 |
| HCT, % | 514 | 29.05 | 6.79 | 23.4 | 10.90 | 58.00 |
| HGB, g/dL | 514 | 8.43 | 1.94 | 23.0 | 3.30 | 17.30 |
aSD: Standard deviation; bCV: Coefficient of variation
Fig. 1First two principal components (pc1: 3.16%;pc2:15%) of the genomic relationship matrix of genotyped animals
Fig. 2Linkage disquilibrium (r 2) between markers considering windows up yo 10 Mb
Summary of SNP markers analyzed and average linkage disequilibrium (LD; r 2) between synthetic adjacent markers obtained for each autosome (OAR)
| OAR |
| Mean LD | SDa LD | Mean Distance, Mb | SDa Distance, Mb |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 707 | 0.09 | 0.17 | 0.75 | 1.5 |
| 2 | 683 | 0.09 | 0.15 | 1.01 | 1.9 |
| 3 | 222 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 2.60 | 3.0 |
| 4 | 297 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 2.64 | 3.1 |
| 5 | 369 | 0.10 | 0.19 | 0.72 | 1.5 |
| 6 | 112 | 0.03 | 0.10 | 2.7 | 2.5 |
| 7 | 79 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 3.4 | 2.8 |
| 8 | 288 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 1.9 | 2.8 |
| 9 | 313 | 0.07 | 0.14 | 1.3 | 2.3 |
| 10 | 108 | 0.04 | 0.10 | 3.7 | 2.8 |
| 11 | 171 | 0.06 | 0.11 | 1.5 | 2.5 |
| 12 | 224 | 0.06 | 0.12 | 1.9 | 2.7 |
| 13 | 228 | 0.07 | 0.14 | 2.1 | 2.6 |
| 14 | 131 | 0.07 | 0.14 | 3.0 | 3.1 |
| 15 | 253 | 0.08 | 0.16 | 1.5 | 2.5 |
| 16 | 257 | 0.08 | 0.16 | 1.7 | 2.4 |
| 17 | 152 | 0.07 | 0.16 | 2.6 | 3.1 |
| 18 | 190 | 0.07 | 0.12 | 1.7 | 2.5 |
| 19 | 87 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 2.6 | 2.9 |
| 20 | 137 | 0.03 | 0.10 | 3.4 | 2.9 |
| 21 | 168 | 0.06 | 0.16 | 2.1 | 2.8 |
| 22 | 137 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 2.2 | 2.7 |
| 23 | 201 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.9 | 1.7 |
| 24 | 125 | 0.09 | 0.17 | 1.6 | 2.1 |
| 25 | 84 | 0.02 | 0.11 | 3.2 | 2.6 |
| 26 | 175 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 0.93 | 1.7 |
aSD: Standard deviation
Estimates of additive genetic variance (Va), residual variance (Vr), and heritability (h 2) for log10 of eggs per gram of feces (EPGlog), red blood cells (RBC), famacha (FAM), platelets (PLT), white blood cells (WBC), hematocrit (HCT), and hemoglobin (HGB)
| Trait | Va | Vr |
| SDa | Median | HPDi | HPDs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EPGlog | 0.13 | 1.03 | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.001 | 0.28 |
| RBC | 0.45 | 2.01 | 0.18 | 0.10 | 0.17 | 0.004 | 0.37 |
| FAM | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.35 | 0.11 | 0.35 | 0.14 | 0.58 |
| PLT | 6.14 | 28.77 | 0.17 | 0.09 | 0.17 | 0.02 | 0.35 |
| WBC | 2.71 | 9.27 | 0.22 | 0.10 | 0.22 | 0.03 | 0.41 |
| HCT | 4.93 | 19.04 | 0.20 | 0.11 | 0.19 | 0.001 | 0.41 |
| HGB | 0.29 | 1.44 | 0.16 | 0.10 | 0.15 | 0.001 | 0.36 |
aSD: heritability standard deviation; HPDi: lower limit of credibility interval (95%) for heritability posterior distribution; HPDs: upper limit of credibility interval (95%) for heritability posterior distribution
Fig. 3Manhattan plot of the additive genetic variance explained by windows of 10 adjacent SNPs for hematocrit (HCT) trait
Fig. 4Manhattan plot of the additive genetic variance explained by windows of 10 adjacent SNPs for hemoglobin (HGB) trait
Fig. 5Manhattan plot of the additive genetic variance explained by windows of 10 adjacent SNPs for egg count per gram of feces (EPGlog) trait
Fig. 6 Manhattan plot of the additive genetic variance explained by windows of 10 adjacent SNPs for famacha (FAM) trait
Fig. 7Metabolic pathway involving genes present for egg count per gram of feces (EPG) and famacha (FAM) traits
Fig. 8Manhattan plot of the additive genetic variance explained by windows of 10 adjacent SNPs for white blood cells (WBC) trait
Fig. 9Manhattan plot of the additive genetic variance explained by windows of 10 adjacent SNPs for red blood cells (RBC) trait
Fig. 10Manhattan plot of the additive genetic variance explained by windows of 10 adjacent SNPs for platelet (PLT) trait