Literature DB >> 19448030

Technical note: Derivation of equivalent computing algorithms for genomic predictions and reliabilities of animal merit.

I Strandén1, D J Garrick.   

Abstract

Conventional prediction of dairy cattle merit involves setting up and solving linear equations with the number of unknowns being the number of animals, typically millions, multiplied by the number of traits being simultaneously assessed. The coefficient matrix has been large and sparse and iteration on data has been the method of choice, whereby the coefficient matrix is not stored but recreated as needed. In contrast, genomic prediction involves assessment of the merit of genome fragments characterized by single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes, currently some 50,000, which can then be used to predict the merit of individual animals according to the fragments they have inherited. The prediction equations for chromosome fragments typically have fewer than 100,000 unknowns, but the number of observations used to predict the fragment effects can be one-tenth the number of fragments. The coefficient matrix tends to be dense and the resulting system of equations can be ill behaved. Equivalent computing algorithms for genomic prediction were derived. The number of unknowns in the equivalent system grows with number of genotyped animals, usually bulls, rather than the number of chromosome fragment effects. In circumstances with fewer genotyped animals than single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes, these equivalent computations allow the solving of a smaller system of equations that behaves numerically better. There were 3 solving strategies compared: 1 method that formed and stored the coefficient matrix in memory and 2 methods that iterate on data. Finally, formulas for reliabilities of genomic predictions of merit were developed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19448030     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2008-1929

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  100 in total

1.  Multivariate whole genome average interval mapping: QTL analysis for multiple traits and/or environments.

Authors:  Arūnas P Verbyla; Brian R Cullis
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis.

Authors:  Jian Yang; S Hong Lee; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 3.  Applications of population genetics to animal breeding, from wright, fisher and lush to genomic prediction.

Authors:  William G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Genomic selection strategies for breeding adaptation and production in dairy cattle under climate change.

Authors:  Ismo Strandén; Juha Kantanen; Isa-Rita M Russo; Pablo Orozco-terWengel; Michael W Bruford
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Genome-Wide Association Analyses Based on Broadly Different Specifications for Prior Distributions, Genomic Windows, and Estimation Methods.

Authors:  Chunyu Chen; Juan P Steibel; Robert J Tempelman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Genomic Prediction Using Individual-Level Data and Summary Statistics from Multiple Populations.

Authors:  Jeremie Vandenplas; Mario P L Calus; Gregor Gorjanc
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The effect of linkage disequilibrium and family relationships on the reliability of genomic prediction.

Authors:  Yvonne C J Wientjes; Roel F Veerkamp; Mario P L Calus
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-12-24       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  A novel generalized ridge regression method for quantitative genetics.

Authors:  Xia Shen; Moudud Alam; Freddy Fikse; Lars Rönnegård
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 9.  The nature, scope and impact of genomic prediction in beef cattle in the United States.

Authors:  Dorian J Garrick
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Deregressing estimated breeding values and weighting information for genomic regression analyses.

Authors:  Dorian J Garrick; Jeremy F Taylor; Rohan L Fernando
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.