Literature DB >> 22059575

Efficient computation of the genomic relationship matrix and other matrices used in single-step evaluation.

I Aguilar1, I Misztal, A Legarra, S Tsuruta.   

Abstract

Genomic evaluations can be calculated using a unified procedure that combines phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information. Implementation of such a procedure requires the inverse of the relationship matrix based on pedigree and genomic relationships. The objective of this study was to investigate efficient computing options to create relationship matrices based on genomic markers and pedigree information as well as their inverses. SNP maker information was simulated for a panel of 40 K SNPs, with the number of genotyped animals up to 30 000. Matrix multiplication in the computation of the genomic relationship was by a simple 'do' loop, by two optimized versions of the loop, and by a specific matrix multiplication subroutine. Inversion was by a generalized inverse algorithm and by a LAPACK subroutine. With the most efficient choices and parallel processing, creation of matrices for 30 000 animals would take a few hours. Matrices required to implement a unified approach can be computed efficiently. Optimizations can be either by modifications of existing code or by the use of efficient automatic optimizations provided by open source or third-party libraries.
© 2011 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22059575     DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2010.00912.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Breed Genet        ISSN: 0931-2668            Impact factor:   2.380


  43 in total

1.  The impact of reducing the frequency of animals genotyped at higher density on imputation and prediction accuracies using ssGBLUP1.

Authors:  Bruna P Sollero; Jeremy T Howard; Matthew L Spangler
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Functional Variants Associated With CMPK2 and in ASB16 Influence Bovine Digital Dermatitis.

Authors:  Diana Oelschlaegel; Monika Wensch-Dorendorf; Grit Kopke; Roswitha Jungnickel; Benno Waurich; Frank Rosner; Dörte Döpfer; Bertram Brenig; Hermann H Swalve
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 4.772

3.  Genetic prediction of complex traits: integrating infinitesimal and marked genetic effects.

Authors:  Clément Carré; Fabrice Gamboa; David Cros; John Michael Hickey; Gregor Gorjanc; Eduardo Manfredi
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 1.082

4.  A note on the rationale for estimating genealogical coancestry from molecular markers.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Toro; Luis Alberto García-Cortés; Andrés Legarra
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.297

5.  Accuracy of estimated breeding values with genomic information on males, females, or both: an example on broiler chicken.

Authors:  Daniela A L Lourenco; Breno O Fragomeni; Shogo Tsuruta; Ignacio Aguilar; Birgit Zumbach; Rachel J Hawken; Andres Legarra; Ignacy Misztal
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 4.297

6.  A computationally efficient algorithm for genomic prediction using a Bayesian model.

Authors:  Tingting Wang; Yi-Ping Phoebe Chen; Michael E Goddard; Theo H E Meuwissen; Kathryn E Kemper; Ben J Hayes
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  Genomic prediction of disease occurrence using producer-recorded health data: a comparison of methods.

Authors:  Kristen L Parker Gaddis; Francesco Tiezzi; John B Cole; John S Clay; Christian Maltecca
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 4.297

8.  A Single-Step Genome Wide Association Study on Body Size Traits Using Imputation-Based Whole-Genome Sequence Data in Yorkshire Pigs.

Authors:  Huatao Liu; Hailiang Song; Yifan Jiang; Yao Jiang; Fengxia Zhang; Yibing Liu; Yong Shi; Xiangdong Ding; Chuduan Wang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 4.599

9.  Joint genomic evaluation of French dairy cattle breeds using multiple-trait models.

Authors:  Sofiene Karoui; María Jesús Carabaño; Clara Díaz; Andrés Legarra
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Compatibility of pedigree-based and marker-based relationship matrices for single-step genetic evaluation.

Authors:  Ole F Christensen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.