Literature DB >> 28867882

Visibility of Strings After Postplacental Intracesarean Insertion of CuT380A and Cu375 Intrauterine Contraceptive Device: A Randomized Comparative Study.

Kavita Agarwal1, Rupali Dewan1, Pratima Mittal1, Abha Aggarwal2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the incidence of visible strings after postplacental intracesarean insertion of Cu375 and CuT380A intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUD).
METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized comparative study. A total of 100 women fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria underwent postplacental intracesarean insertion of either Cu375 IUD or CuT380A IUD. Women were followed up at 1, 6 weeks and 3 months after IUD insertion and were questioned about IUD expulsion or removal at each visit. The cervix was inspected to visualize the IUD strings. Data were analyzed by Chi-square test.
RESULTS: At 6-week follow-up, 97.9% women in group A versus 41.7% women in group B had strings visible at the cervical os and at 3 months 100% women in group A versus only 47.9% women in group B (p < 0.001) had visible strings of IUD.
CONCLUSION: Both Cu375 and CuT380A IUD are safe postpartum method of contraception but Cu375 if used for intracesarean IUD insertion increases the incidence of visible IUD strings. Hence, it avoids radiological investigations and invasive procedures at follow-up visits required to locate the IUD when strings are not visible. CTRI No. CTRI/2015/09/006221.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cu375 IUD; CuT380A IUD; Intracesarean PPIUD; Postpartum contraception; String visibility

Year:  2017        PMID: 28867882      PMCID: PMC5561761          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-017-0965-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of Safety, Efficacy, and Expulsion of Post-Placental and Intra-Cesarean Insertion of Intrauterine Contraceptive Devices (PPIUCD).

Authors:  Sujnanendra Mishra
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2014-05-18

2.  Immediate postplacental IUD insertion at cesarean delivery: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Erika Levi; Evelyn Cantillo; Veronica Ades; Erika Banks; Amitasrigowri Murthy
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  In-office retrieval of intrauterine contraceptive devices with missing strings.

Authors:  Sujatha Prabhakaran; Alice Chuang
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Insertion of intrauterine contraceptive device at caesarean section.

Authors:  Shereen Zulfiqar Bhutta; Iffat Javed Butt; Khadeja Bano
Journal:  J Coll Physicians Surg Pak       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.711

5.  Clinical Outcome of Postplacental Copper T 380A Insertion in Women Delivering by Caesarean Section.

Authors:  Sunita Singal; Rekha Bharti; Rupali Dewan; Anjali Dabral; Achla Batra; Manjula Sharma; Pratima Mittal
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-09-20

6.  Immediate placement of intrauterine devices after first and second trimester pregnancy termination.

Authors:  Michelle C Fox; Julia Oat-Judge; Kathryn Severson; Roxanne M Jamshidi; Rameet H Singh; Raegan McDonald-Mosley; Anne E Burke
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  Intracesarean insertion of the Copper T380A versus 6 weeks postcesarean: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Felicia Lester; Othman Kakaire; Josaphat Byamugisha; Sarah Averbach; Jennifer Fortin; Rie Maurer; Alisa Goldberg
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  Non-visualisation of strings after postplacental insertion of Copper-T 380A intrauterine device.

Authors:  Rupali Dewan; Abhinav Dewan; Sunita Singal; Rekha Bharti; Mansi Kaim
Journal:  J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care       Date:  2016-05-20

Review 9.  Intrauterine contraception after cesarean section and during lactation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Norman D Goldstuck; Petrus S Steyn
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2013-12-04
  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Expulsion of intrauterine devices after postpartum placement by timing of placement, delivery type, and intrauterine device type: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sarah H Averbach; Yokabed Ermias; Gary Jeng; Kathryn M Curtis; Maura K Whiteman; Erin Berry-Bibee; Denise J Jamieson; Polly A Marchbanks; Naomi K Tepper; Tara C Jatlaoui
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Intrauterine Device Expulsion After Postpartum Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tara C Jatlaoui; Maura K Whiteman; Gary Jeng; Naomi K Tepper; Erin Berry-Bibee; Denise J Jamieson; Polly A Marchbanks; Kathryn M Curtis
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.661

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.