Literature DB >> 25499587

Intracesarean insertion of the Copper T380A versus 6 weeks postcesarean: a randomized clinical trial.

Felicia Lester1, Othman Kakaire2, Josaphat Byamugisha2, Sarah Averbach3, Jennifer Fortin4, Rie Maurer5, Alisa Goldberg6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare rates of Copper T380A intrauterine device (IUD) utilization and satisfaction with immediate versus delayed IUD insertion after cesarean delivery in Kampala, Uganda.
METHODS: This study was a randomized clinical trial of women undergoing cesarean section who desired an IUD in Kampala, Uganda. Participants were randomly assigned to IUD insertion at the time of cesarean delivery or 6weeks afterward. The primary outcome was IUD utilization at 6months after delivery.
RESULTS: Among 68 women who underwent randomization, an IUD was inserted in 100% (34/34) of the women in the immediate insertion group and in 53% (18/34) in the delayed group. IUD use at 6 months was higher in the immediate insertion group (93% vs. 50% after delayed insertion; p<.0001). Infection and expulsion were rare and did not differ between groups. When we pooled both groups and looked at IUD users compared to nonusers, 91% (39/43) of IUD users were satisfied or very satisfied with their contraceptive method compared to 44% (11/25) of nonusers (p<.0001). Women who chose not to be in the study or had the IUD removed often did so because of perceived husband or community disapproval.
CONCLUSION: The 6-month utilization of an IUD after immediate insertion was significantly higher than after delayed insertion without increased complications. Contraceptive satisfaction was significantly higher among IUD users than nonusers. Community and husband attitudes influence IUD utilization and continuation in Kampala, Uganda. IMPLICATIONS: This work is important because it shows the safety and efficacy of providing IUDs during cesarean section in a setting where access to any healthcare, including contraception, can be extremely limited outside of childbearing and the consequences of an unintended, closely spaced pregnancy after a cesarean section can be life threatening.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Family planning; Global health; IUD; Immediate postpartum IUD insertion; LARC

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25499587     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  11 in total

1.  Immediate versus delayed postpartum use of levonorgestrel contraceptive implants: a randomized controlled trial in Uganda.

Authors:  Sarah Averbach; Othman Kakaire; Herbert Kayiga; Felicia Lester; Abby Sokoloff; Josaphat Byamugisha; Christine Dehlendorf; Jody Steinauer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Visibility of Strings After Postplacental Intracesarean Insertion of CuT380A and Cu375 Intrauterine Contraceptive Device: A Randomized Comparative Study.

Authors:  Kavita Agarwal; Rupali Dewan; Pratima Mittal; Abha Aggarwal
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2017-01-30

3.  Comparison of an additional early visit to routine postpartum care on initiation of long-acting reversible contraception: A randomized trial.

Authors:  Caitlin Bernard; Leping Wan; Jeffrey F Peipert; Tessa Madden
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Expulsion of intrauterine devices after postpartum placement by timing of placement, delivery type, and intrauterine device type: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sarah H Averbach; Yokabed Ermias; Gary Jeng; Kathryn M Curtis; Maura K Whiteman; Erin Berry-Bibee; Denise J Jamieson; Polly A Marchbanks; Naomi K Tepper; Tara C Jatlaoui
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  A Decision Analysis Model of 1-Year Effectiveness of Intended Postplacental Compared With Intended Delayed Postpartum Intrauterine Device Insertion.

Authors:  Sarita Sonalkar; Tegan Hunter; Elizabeth P Gurney; Arden McAllister; Courtney A Schreiber
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Intrauterine Device Expulsion After Postpartum Placement: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tara C Jatlaoui; Maura K Whiteman; Gary Jeng; Naomi K Tepper; Erin Berry-Bibee; Denise J Jamieson; Polly A Marchbanks; Kathryn M Curtis
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  A Meta-Analysis of Postpartum Copper IUD Continuation Rates in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Authors:  Angela Marchin; Angela Moss; Margo Harrison
Journal:  J Womens Health Dev       Date:  2021-03-18

Review 8.  Insertion of intrauterine devices after cesarean section: a systematic review update.

Authors:  Norman D Goldstuck; Petrus S Steyn
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2017-04-18

9.  Couples' decision-making on post-partum family planning and antenatal counselling in Uganda: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Merlin L Willcox; Vincent Mubangizi; Silvia Natukunda; Judith Owokuhaisa; Haeven Nahabwe; Florence Nakaggwa; Matthew Laughton; Isabella Chambers; Sabine Coates; Emma King; Emma Fall; Ingrid Muller; Clare Goodhart; Jonathan Graffy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Ultrasound assessment of postplacental copper intrauterine device position 6 months after placement during cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Elizabeth P Gurney; Arden McAllister; Britt Lang; Courtney A Schreiber; Sarita Sonalkar
Journal:  Contracept X       Date:  2020-10-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.