BACKGROUND: A simpler approach to cervical cancer screening could increase coverage, thus reducing cervical cancer mortality in the United States. Self-collection of specimens for screening tests may be one such approach. The aim of this study was to assess the acceptability of a self-lavaging device (Delphi Screener(™), Scherpenzeel, The Netherlands) for cervical cancer screening. Self-lavage specimens have been shown to have equivalent sensitivity for detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) when coupled with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) tests as clinician-collected specimens with cytologic review. METHODS: Low-income women (n=198) who had recently received cervical cytologic testing in one of three participating clinics in New York City enrolled; 197 self-lavaged. Women answered open-ended and closed-ended questions on ease of use, level of comfort with the self-lavage and the pelvic examination, and future screening preference. RESULTS: Ninety-six percent of women reported they were very/somewhat comfortable self-lavaging compared to 47% very/somewhat comfortable with the clinician collecting a specimen during a pelvic examination (p<0.001). The majority (79%) would prefer self-lavage the next time they need to be screened; only 8% would prefer pelvic examination by a doctor, and 14% had no preference. The main reasons for preferring self-lavage centered on convenience and comfort. CONCLUSIONS: Self-lavaging was highly acceptable to women in this study. Self-collection of specimens has the potential to simplify screening and reduce logistical barriers for many women, which could increase overall coverage of cervical cancer screening.
BACKGROUND: A simpler approach to cervical cancer screening could increase coverage, thus reducing cervical cancer mortality in the United States. Self-collection of specimens for screening tests may be one such approach. The aim of this study was to assess the acceptability of a self-lavaging device (Delphi Screener(™), Scherpenzeel, The Netherlands) for cervical cancer screening. Self-lavage specimens have been shown to have equivalent sensitivity for detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) when coupled with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) tests as clinician-collected specimens with cytologic review. METHODS: Low-income women (n=198) who had recently received cervical cytologic testing in one of three participating clinics in New York City enrolled; 197 self-lavaged. Women answered open-ended and closed-ended questions on ease of use, level of comfort with the self-lavage and the pelvic examination, and future screening preference. RESULTS: Ninety-six percent of women reported they were very/somewhat comfortable self-lavaging compared to 47% very/somewhat comfortable with the clinician collecting a specimen during a pelvic examination (p<0.001). The majority (79%) would prefer self-lavage the next time they need to be screened; only 8% would prefer pelvic examination by a doctor, and 14% had no preference. The main reasons for preferring self-lavage centered on convenience and comfort. CONCLUSIONS: Self-lavaging was highly acceptable to women in this study. Self-collection of specimens has the potential to simplify screening and reduce logistical barriers for many women, which could increase overall coverage of cervical cancer screening.
Authors: Erik J Nelson; John Hughes; J Michael Oakes; Bharat Thyagarajan; James S Pankow; Shalini L Kulasingam Journal: J Community Health Date: 2015-06
Authors: Caitlin B Biddell; Meghan C O'Leary; Stephanie B Wheeler; Lisa P Spees Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2020-05-26 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Chelsea Anderson; Lindsay Breithaupt; Andrea Des Marais; Charlotte Rastas; Alice Richman; Lynn Barclay; Noel T Brewer; Jennifer S Smith Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2017-09-02 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Janet M McNicholl; Wanna Leelawiwat; Sara Whitehead; Debra L Hanson; Tammy Evans-Strickfaden; Chen Y Cheng; Wannee Chonwattana; Famui Mueanpai; Chonticha Kittinunvorakoon; Lauri Markowitz; Eileen F Dunne Journal: Int J STD AIDS Date: 2016-07-10 Impact factor: 1.359
Authors: Viola M J Verhoef; Maaike G Dijkstra; Remko P Bosgraaf; Albertus T Hesselink; Willem J G Melchers; Ruud L M Bekkers; Johannes Berkhof; Folkert J van Kemenade Journal: BMC Womens Health Date: 2013-05-02 Impact factor: 2.809