Literature DB >> 10197853

Prostate cancer detection: relationship to prostate size.

M E Chen1, P Troncoso, D Johnston, K Tang, R J Babaian.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: It has been suggested that the lower detection rate for cancer in large prostates is due to the smaller proportion of tissue sampled. To examine this hypothesis, we evaluated whole-mount radical prostatectomy specimens in which the volume of cancer had been determined. We correlated cancer volume to overall gland volume. In addition, we performed stochastic computer simulations of parasagittal sextant biopsies on the same group of radical prostatectomy specimens. We correlated the likelihood of a positive cancer biopsy simulation with tumor volume and gland size.
METHODS: Six hundred seven tumor foci from 180 serially sectioned whole-mount prostatectomy specimens were mapped and digitized. Tumor volume was calculated by a step-section planimetry algorithm. Before sectioning, each gland was weighed. Systematic parasagittal sextant biopsies were computer simulated for each case. For each prostate, 40 simulations were performed, with random variations in biopsy location programmed for each run. Overall cancer detection by biopsy was considered positive if 90% of the 40 simulation runs were positive for cancer. Chi-square tests were used to evaluate statistical significance.
RESULTS: Small-volume cancers (0.5 cc or less) were twice as frequent in large glands greater than 50 g (P = 0.03). These small-volume tumors comprised 33% (13 of 40) of cancers in prostates greater than 50 g, 16% (5 of 31) in glands less than 30 g, and 14% (15 of 109) in glands 30 to 50 g. The rate of positive sextant biopsy simulation was lower in glands greater than 50 g than in glands 50 g or less (48% versus 67%, P<0.03). Smaller cancers were much less likely to be detected in the simulations. The simulation detection rate for cancers 0.5 cc or less was 18% (6 of 33), compared with a detection rate of 73% (107 of 147) for cancers greater than 0.5 cc (P<0.00001).
CONCLUSIONS: The observed lower cancer detection rate in large glands is a result of the higher proportion of low-volume cancers in these glands. This suggests that large prostates are more likely to be biopsied because of an elevated prostate-specific antigen value resulting from benign elements of the gland and not from a significant cancer. Increasing the number of cores solely to compensate for increased prostate size risks a disproportionate increased detection of small-volume tumors with a low clinical likelihood of progression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10197853     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00574-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  20 in total

1.  Prostate biopsy: targeting cancer for detection and therapy.

Authors:  Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2006

2.  Optimizing prostate biopsy strategies for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2003

3.  Prostate biopsy schemes and the detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  S R Potter; A W Partin
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  1999

Review 4.  Strategies for repeat prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Martha K Terris
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Anterior tumors of the prostate: diagnosis and significance.

Authors:  Priya N Werahera; E David Crawford; Francisco G La Rosa; Kathleen C Torkko; Beth Schulte; Holly T Sullivan; Adrie van Bokhoven; M Scott Lucia; Fernando J Kim
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.344

6.  Possible clinical implications of peripheral zone changes depending on prostate size.

Authors:  Joshua M Frost; Lisa A Smith; Pranav Sharma; Werner T de Riese
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Computer simulations suggest that prostate enlargement due to benign prostatic hyperplasia mechanically impedes prostate cancer growth.

Authors:  Guillermo Lorenzo; Thomas J R Hughes; Pablo Dominguez-Frojan; Alessandro Reali; Hector Gomez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Longer biopsy cores do not increase prostate cancer detection rate: A large-scale cohort study refuting cut-off values indicated in the literature.

Authors:  Hasan Yılmaz; Ufuk Yavuz; Murat Üstüner; Seyfettin Çiftçi; Hikmet Yaşar; Bahar Müezzinoğlu; Ali Kemal Uslubaş; Özdal Dillioğlugil
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-07-31

9.  Interactions between benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer in large prostates: a retrospective data review.

Authors:  Shadi Al-Khalil; David Boothe; Trey Durdin; Sowmya Sunkara; Phillip Watkins; Shengping Yang; Allan Haynes; Werner de Riese
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Prostate cancer diagnosed after repeat biopsies have a favorable pathological outcome but similar recurrence rate.

Authors:  Ernesto Lopez-Corona; Makoto Ohori; Thomas M Wheeler; Victor E Reuter; Peter T Scardino; Michael W Kattan; James A Eastham
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.