Literature DB >> 28855289

The neural code for tactile roughness in the somatosensory nerves.

Justin D Lieber1, Xinyue Xia2, Alison I Weber3, Sliman J Bensmaia4,2.   

Abstract

Roughness is the most salient perceptual dimension of surface texture but has no well-defined physical basis. We seek to determine the neural determinants of tactile roughness in the somatosensory nerves. Specifically, we record the patterns of activation evoked in tactile nerve fibers of anesthetized Rhesus macaques to a large and diverse set of natural textures and assess what aspect of these patterns of activation can account for psychophysical judgments of roughness, obtained from human observers. We show that perceived roughness is determined by the variation in the population response, weighted by fiber type. That is, a surface will feel rough to the extent that the activity varies across nerve fibers and varies across time within nerve fibers. We show that this variation-based neural code can account not only for magnitude estimates of roughness but also for roughness discrimination performance.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Our sense of touch endows us with an exquisite sensitivity to the microstructure of surfaces, the most salient aspect of which is roughness. We analyze the responses evoked in tactile fibers of monkeys by natural textures and compare them to judgments of roughness obtained for the same textures from human observers. We then describe how texture signals from three populations of nerve fibers are integrated to culminate in a percept of roughness.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  psychophysics; somatosensory; texture; touch

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28855289      PMCID: PMC6148298          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00374.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  37 in total

1.  Neural coding mechanisms underlying perceived roughness of finely textured surfaces.

Authors:  T Yoshioka; B Gibb; A K Dorsch; S S Hsiao; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Representation of braille characters in human nerve fibres.

Authors:  J R Phillips; R S Johansson; K O Johnson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Tactile roughness: neural codes that account for psychophysical magnitude estimates.

Authors:  C E Connor; S S Hsiao; J R Phillips; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Pacinian representations of fine surface texture.

Authors:  Sliman Bensmaïa; Mark Hollins
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2005-07

5.  Spatial and temporal codes mediate the tactile perception of natural textures.

Authors:  Alison I Weber; Hannes P Saal; Justin D Lieber; Ju-Wen Cheng; Louise R Manfredi; John F Dammann; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Neural coding mechanisms in tactile pattern recognition: the relative contributions of slowly and rapidly adapting mechanoreceptors to perceived roughness.

Authors:  D T Blake; S S Hsiao; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Single tactile afferents outperform human subjects in a vibrotactile intensity discrimination task.

Authors:  Ehsan Arabzadeh; Colin W G Clifford; Justin A Harris; David A Mahns; Vaughan G Macefield; Ingvars Birznieks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The sense of flutter-vibration: comparison of the human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive afferents from the monkey hand.

Authors:  W H Talbot; I Darian-Smith; H H Kornhuber; V B Mountcastle
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Mechanisms of fine-surface-texture discrimination in human tactile sensation.

Authors:  T Miyaoka; T Mano; M Ohka
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Responses of mechanoreceptive afferent units in the glabrous skin of the human hand to sinusoidal skin displacements.

Authors:  R S Johansson; U Landström; R Lundström
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1982-07-22       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  11 in total

1.  Human touch receptors are sensitive to spatial details on the scale of single fingerprint ridges.

Authors:  Ewa Jarocka; J Andrew Pruszynski; Roland S Johansson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Emergence of an Invariant Representation of Texture in Primate Somatosensory Cortex.

Authors:  Justin D Lieber; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 3.  Of mice and monkeys: Somatosensory processing in two prominent animal models.

Authors:  Daniel H O'Connor; Leah Krubitzer; Sliman Bensmaia
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 11.685

4.  Individual differences in cognitive processing for roughness rating of fine and coarse textures.

Authors:  Makiko Natsume; Yoshihiro Tanaka; Astrid M L Kappers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  High-dimensional representation of texture in somatosensory cortex of primates.

Authors:  Justin D Lieber; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-02-04       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Spinal signalling of C-fiber mediated pleasant touch in humans.

Authors:  Andrew G Marshall; Manohar L Sharma; Kate Marley; Hakan Olausson; Francis P McGlone
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Sensory computations in the cuneate nucleus of macaques.

Authors:  Aneesha K Suresh; Charles M Greenspon; Qinpu He; Joshua M Rosenow; Lee E Miller; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Texture is encoded in precise temporal spiking patterns in primate somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Katie H Long; Justin D Lieber; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Global surface features contribute to human haptic roughness estimations.

Authors:  Huazhi Li; Jiajia Yang; Yinghua Yu; Wu Wang; Yulong Liu; Mengni Zhou; Qingqing Li; Jingjing Yang; Shiping Shao; Satoshi Takahashi; Yoshimichi Ejima; Jinglong Wu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The spatial profile of skin indentation shapes tactile perception across stimulus frequencies.

Authors:  Roman V Grigorii; J Edward Colgate; Roberta Klatzky
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 4.996

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.