Literature DB >> 25143540

Single tactile afferents outperform human subjects in a vibrotactile intensity discrimination task.

Ehsan Arabzadeh1, Colin W G Clifford2, Justin A Harris3, David A Mahns4, Vaughan G Macefield5, Ingvars Birznieks6.   

Abstract

We simultaneously compared the sensitivity of single primary afferent neurons supplying the glabrous skin of the hand and the psychophysical amplitude discrimination thresholds in human subjects for a set of vibrotactile stimuli delivered to the receptive field. All recorded afferents had a dynamic range narrower than the range of amplitudes across which the subjects could discriminate. However, when the vibration amplitude was chosen to be within the steepest part of the afferent's stimulus-response function the response of single afferents, defined as the spike count over the vibration duration (500 ms), was often more sensitive in discriminating vibration amplitude than the perceptual judgment of the participants. We quantified how the neuronal performance depended on the integration window: for short windows the neuronal performance was inferior to the performance of the subject. The neuronal performance progressively improved with increasing spike count duration and reached a level significantly above that of the subjects when the integration window was 250 ms or longer. The superiority in performance of individual neurons over observers could reflect a nonoptimal integration window or be due to the presence of noise between the sensory periphery and the cortical decision stage. Additionally, it could indicate that the range of perceptual sensitivity comes at the cost of discrimination through pooling across neurons with different response functions.
Copyright © 2014 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  microneurography; neural coding; neurometrics; psychometrics

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25143540     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00482.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  5 in total

1.  Neuronal thresholds and choice-related activity of otolith afferent fibers during heading perception.

Authors:  Xiong-jie Yu; J David Dickman; Gregory C DeAngelis; Dora E Angelaki
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The neural code for tactile roughness in the somatosensory nerves.

Authors:  Justin D Lieber; Xinyue Xia; Alison I Weber; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Rate and timing of cortical responses driven by separate sensory channels.

Authors:  Hannes P Saal; Michael A Harvey; Sliman J Bensmaia
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Humans Use a Temporally Local Code for Vibrotactile Perception.

Authors:  Arindam Bhattacharjee; Christoph Braun; Cornelius Schwarz
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-11-04

5.  Multiplexed Population Coding of Stimulus Properties by Leech Mechanosensory Cells.

Authors:  Friederice Pirschel; Jutta Kretzberg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 6.167

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.