Literature DB >> 28848744

Training robotic hepatectomy: the Hong Kong experience and perspective.

Eric C H Lai1, Chung Ngai Tang1.   

Abstract

The introduction of robotic surgical systems has revolutionized the practice of minimal invasive surgery (MIS). Although little data regarding robotic hepatectomies have been reported, it appears to be similar to conventional laparoscopic approach in terms of blood loss, morbidity rate, mortality rate and hospital stay at least. The application of robotic system in liver surgery was not well evaluated yet, particularly learning curve. Studies were identified by searching MEDLINE and PubMed databases for articles from January 2001 to May 2016 using the keywords "laparoscopic hepatectomy", "robotic hepatectomy", and "learning curve". With the limited data in robotic hepatectomy, the learning curve model of robotic hepatectomy needs to base on the experience of conventional laparoscopic hepatectomy. Based on the learning curve study experience for laparoscopic hepatectomies, the minimal number laparoscopic minor and major hepatectomies to overcome learning curve are 22-64 cases, and 45-75 cases, respectively. Left lateral sectionectomy technique is more standardized, and it is a good start for training of MIS liver surgery. However, the training program required for the robotic liver surgeons still highly depends on the surgeons' experience of previous open and laparoscopic liver surgery, the surgeons' previous experience of other robotic surgeries, the experience of the surgical team including the assistant surgeons and nursing staffs, and the complexity of the diseases. We discourage performance of robotic hepatectomy in the occasional patient by a team that is not well prepared and is not embedded in a specialized center. Knowledge and practical skills are both required in MIS liver surgery and cannot be replaced by newer tools, including the most advanced robotic system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopy; hepatectomy; learning curve; robotic surgery; training

Year:  2017        PMID: 28848744      PMCID: PMC5554762          DOI: 10.21037/hbsn.2017.01.21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr        ISSN: 2304-3881            Impact factor:   7.293


  25 in total

1.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic hemi-hepatectomy: technique and surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Eric C H Lai; Chung Ngai Tang; Michael K W Li
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 6.071

2.  Pure Laparoscopic Hepatectomy Versus Open Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in 110 Patients With Liver Cirrhosis: A Propensity Analysis at a Single Center.

Authors:  Tan To Cheung; Wing Chiu Dai; Simon H Y Tsang; Albert C Y Chan; Kenneth S H Chok; See Ching Chan; Chung Mau Lo
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Long-term results of laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a case-matched analysis.

Authors:  Kit Fai Lee; Ching Ning Chong; Jeff Wong; Yue Sun Cheung; John Wong; Paul Lai
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  The learning curve of laparoscopic liver resection after the Louisville statement 2008: Will it be more effective and smooth?

Authors:  Chung-Wei Lin; Tzu-Jung Tsai; Tsung-Yen Cheng; Hung-Kuang Wei; Chen-Fang Hung; Yin-Yin Chen; Chii-Ming Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopy versus open left lateral segmentectomy for recurrent pyogenic cholangitis.

Authors:  C N Tang; C K Tai; J P Y Ha; W T Siu; K K Tsui; M K W Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-07-28       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Multimodality laparoscopic liver resection for hepatic malignancy--from conventional total laparoscopic approach to robot-assisted laparoscopic approach.

Authors:  Eric C H Lai; Chung Ngai Tang; George P C Yang; Michael K W Li
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 6.071

7.  Outcome of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases.

Authors:  Tan To Cheung; Ronnie T P Poon; Wai Key Yuen; Kenneth S H Chok; Simon H Y Tsang; Thomas Yau; See Ching Chan; Chung Mau Lo
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 1.872

8.  Long-term Survival Analysis of Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Eric C H Lai; Chung Ngai Tang
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.719

9.  Safely extending the indications of laparoscopic liver resection: When should we start laparoscopic major hepatectomy?

Authors:  Yasushi Hasegawa; Hiroyuki Nitta; Takeshi Takahara; Hirokatsu Katagiri; Shigeaki Baba; Daiki Takeda; Kenji Makabe; Go Wakabayashi; Akira Sasaki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial caudate lobe resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic liver.

Authors:  Eric C H Lai; Chung-Ngai Tang
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.719

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Robotic gastrointestinal surgery: learning curve, educational programs and outcomes.

Authors:  Charles C Vining; Kinga B Skowron; Melissa E Hogg
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2021-01-23

Review 2.  Laparoscopic liver resection: a review of current indications and surgical techniques.

Authors:  Chenyang Jia; Hongyu Li; Ningyuan Wen; Junhua Chen; Yonggang Wei; Bo Li
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 7.293

3.  Robotic surgery: the promise and finally the progress.

Authors:  Yuman Fong; Yanghee Woo; Pier C Giulianotti
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 7.293

4.  Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: application of the difficulty scoring system.

Authors:  Charing C N Chong; H T Lok; Andrew K Y Fung; Anthony K W Fong; Y S Cheung; John Wong; K F Lee; Paul B S Lai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Improving Outcomes Defending Patient Safety: The Learning Journey in Robotic Liver Resections.

Authors:  Paolo Magistri; Gian Piero Guerrini; Roberto Ballarin; Giacomo Assirati; Giuseppe Tarantino; Fabrizio Di Benedetto
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Time to take another look at perceived disadvantages of robotic hepatectomy.

Authors:  Yasushi Hasegawa; Hiroyuki Nitta; Takeshi Takahara; Akira Sasaki
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 7.293

7.  First two-stage robotic ALPPS in HCC patients with hepatic vein invasion: a step-by-step procedure from a clinical case.

Authors:  Ming-Gen Hu; Jin Wang; Zhu-Zeng Yin; Rong Liu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-02-21       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  Case report of pure single-port robotic left lateral sectionectomy using the da Vinci SP system.

Authors:  Wan-Joon Kim; Pyoung-Jae Park; Sae-Byeol Choi; Wan-Bae Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 9.  Augmented Reality and Image-Guided Robotic Liver Surgery.

Authors:  Fabio Giannone; Emanuele Felli; Zineb Cherkaoui; Pietro Mascagni; Patrick Pessaux
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 6.639

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.