Literature DB >> 21334468

Multimodality laparoscopic liver resection for hepatic malignancy--from conventional total laparoscopic approach to robot-assisted laparoscopic approach.

Eric C H Lai1, Chung Ngai Tang, George P C Yang, Michael K W Li.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic liver resection can either be total laparoscopic or hand-assisted laparoscopic approach. The recent introduction of robotic surgical systems has revolutionized the field of minimally invasive surgery. It was developed to overcome the disadvantages of conventional laparoscopic surgery. The role of robotic system in laparoscopic surgery was not well evaluated yet. The aim of this cohort study was to evaluate the outcome of multimodality approach of laparoscopic liver resection for hepatic malignancy
METHODS: From January 1998 to August 2010, all patients with hepatic malignancy underwent laparoscopic liver resection were included. A prospectively collected data was analyzed retrospectively.
RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 56 patients with hepatic malignancies (hepatocellular carcinoma, HCC, n = 42; colorectal liver metastases, CLM, n = 14) underwent laparoscopic liver resection in our surgical unit. The majority of cases were performed by hand-assisted laparoscopic approach, n = 31 (55.3%) and the remainder were with total laparoscopic approach, n = 10 (17.9%) and robot-assisted laparoscopic approach, n = 15 (26.8%). The median operation time was 150 min (range, 75-307 min). The median blood loss during surgery was 175 ml (range, 5-2000 ml). Two patients (3.6%) needed open conversion and one patient (1.8%) needed to be converted to hand-assisted laparoscopic approach. The morbidity rate was 14.3%. There was no procedure-related death. 89.3% of patients had R0 resection and 10.7% of patients had R1 resection. The median hospital stay was 6.5 days (range, 2-13 days). The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year disease-free survival rates for HCC were 85%, 47%, and 38%, respectively. The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival rates for HCC were 96%, 67%, and 52%, respectively. The 1-year, and 3-year disease-free survival rates for CLM were 92% and 72%. The 1-year, and 3-year overall survival rates for CLM were 100% and 88%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Multimodality approach of laparoscopic liver resection of hepatic malignancy was feasible, and safe in selected patients. It was associated with a low complications rate. The mid-term and long-term survival outcome was favorable also.
Copyright © 2011 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21334468     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.02.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  19 in total

1.  A step forward in laparoscopic hepatectomy: comments on "Expert consensus on laparoscopic hepatectomy (2013 version) by National Hepatic Surgery Group, Society of Surgery, Chinese Medical Association".

Authors:  Eric C H Lai
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Superselective intra-arterial hepatic injection of indocyanine green (ICG) for fluorescence image-guided segmental positive staining: experimental proof of the concept.

Authors:  Michele Diana; Yu-Yin Liu; Raoul Pop; Seong-Ho Kong; Andras Legnèr; Remy Beaujeux; Patrick Pessaux; Luc Soler; Didier Mutter; Bernard Dallemagne; Jacques Marescaux
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Laparoscopic liver resection for malignancy: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Eyas Alkhalili; Eren Berber
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection: a systematic review and pooled analysis of minor and major hepatectomies.

Authors:  Carolijn L Nota; Inne H Borel Rinkes; Izaak Q Molenaar; Hjalmar C van Santvoort; Yuman Fong; Jeroen Hagendoorn
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2015-12-11       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 5.  Training robotic hepatectomy: the Hong Kong experience and perspective.

Authors:  Eric C H Lai; Chung Ngai Tang
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 7.293

6.  Long-Term and Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Liver Resection for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter, Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Rachel E Beard; Sidrah Khan; Roberto I Troisi; Roberto Montalti; Aude Vanlander; Yuman Fong; T Peter Kingham; Thomas Boerner; Eren Berber; Bora Kahramangil; Joseph F Buell; John B Martinie; Dionisios Vrochides; Chengli Shen; Michele Molinari; David A Geller; Allan Tsung
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Robotic versus laparoscopic resections of posterosuperior segments of the liver: a propensity score-matched comparison.

Authors:  Roberto Montalti; Vincenzo Scuderi; Alberto Patriti; Marco Vivarelli; Roberto I Troisi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  A systematic review of robotic-assisted liver resection and meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatic neoplasms.

Authors:  Jianguo Qiu; Shuting Chen; Du Chengyou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic right hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patient.

Authors:  Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri; Marco Colasanti; Roberto Santoro; Giuseppe Maria Ettorre
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 10.  Outcomes of robotic vs laparoscopic hepatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Roberto Montalti; Giammauro Berardi; Alberto Patriti; Marco Vivarelli; Roberto Ivan Troisi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.