Literature DB >> 33484423

Robotic gastrointestinal surgery: learning curve, educational programs and outcomes.

Charles C Vining1, Kinga B Skowron1, Melissa E Hogg2.   

Abstract

The use of the robotic platform for gastrointestinal surgery was introduced nearly 20 years ago. However, significant growth and advancement has occurred primarily in the last decade. This is due to several advantages over traditional laparoscopic surgery allowing for more complex dissections and reconstructions. Several randomized controlled trials and retrospective reviews have demonstrated equivalent oncologic outcomes compared to open surgery with improved short-term outcomes. Unfortunately, there are currently no universally accepted or implemented training programs for robotic surgery and robotic surgery experience varies greatly. Additionally, several limitations to the robotic platform exist resulting in a distinct learning curve associated with various procedures. Therefore, implementation of robotic surgery requires a multidisciplinary team approach with commitment and investment from clinical faculty, operating room staff and hospital administrators. Additionally, there is a need for wider distribution of educational modules to train more surgeons and reduce the associated learning curve. This article will focus on the implementation of the robotic platform for surgery of the pancreas, stomach, liver, colon and rectum with an emphasis on the associated learning curve, educational platforms to develop proficiency and perioperative outcomes.

Keywords:  Colorectal; Gastric; Gastrointestinal surgery; Learning curve; Liver; Pancreas; Robotic

Year:  2021        PMID: 33484423     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-00973-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  82 in total

1.  A Multi-institutional Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic and Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Amer H Zureikat; Lauren M Postlewait; Yuan Liu; Theresa W Gillespie; Sharon M Weber; Daniel E Abbott; Syed A Ahmad; Shishir K Maithel; Melissa E Hogg; Mazen Zenati; Clifford S Cho; Ahmed Salem; Brent Xia; Jennifer Steve; Trang K Nguyen; Hari B Keshava; Sricharan Chalikonda; R Matthew Walsh; Mark S Talamonti; Susan J Stocker; David J Bentrem; Stephanie Lumpkin; Hong J Kim; Herbert J Zeh; David A Kooby
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Surgery for recurrent pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jörg Kleeff; Carolin Reiser; Ulf Hinz; Jeannine Bachmann; Jürgen Debus; Dirk Jaeger; Helmut Friess; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  [Effect of the administered water volume upon the results of the oral glucose tolerance test in elderly normoglycemic subjects].

Authors:  D Alcalay; C Labram; I Deschamps; H Lestradet
Journal:  Diabete       Date:  1971 Jan-Mar

Review 4.  Laparoscopic surgery of the pancreas.

Authors:  A Cuschieri
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1994-06

5.  The joy of rain on her face.

Authors:  C Patton
Journal:  Aust Nurses J       Date:  1981-07

6.  Recurrence after resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

Authors:  C Sperti; C Pasquali; A Piccoli; S Pedrazzoli
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for periampullary tumours.

Authors:  C Palanivelu; P Senthilnathan; S C Sabnis; N S Babu; S Srivatsan Gurumurthy; N Anand Vijai; V P Nalankilli; P Praveen Raj; R Parthasarathy; S Rajapandian
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  M Gagner; A Pomp
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Hemodynamic, ventilatory and metabolic effects of light isometric exercise in patients with chronic heart failure.

Authors:  H K Reddy; K T Weber; J S Janicki; P A McElroy
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Oncologic Outcomes After Robotic Pancreatic Resections Are Not Inferior to Open Surgery.

Authors:  Mark D Girgis; Mazen S Zenati; Jonathan C King; Ahmad Hamad; Amer H Zureikat; Herbert J Zeh; Melissa E Hogg
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Robotic versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: An Updated Systematic Review.

Authors:  Maurizio Zizzo; Magda Zanelli; Francesca Sanguedolce; Federica Torricelli; Andrea Morini; David Tumiati; Federica Mereu; Antonia Lavinia Zuliani; Andrea Palicelli; Stefano Ascani; Alessandro Giunta
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 2.948

Review 2.  Controversial Role of Robot in Primary and Revisional Bariatric Surgery Procedures: Review of the Literature and Personal Experience.

Authors:  Giovanni Fantola; Enrico Moroni; Matteo Runfola; Emanuele Lai; Stefano Pintus; Pierpaolo Gallucci; Francesco Pennestrì; Marco Raffaelli
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-31

3.  Will It Play in Peoria? A Pilot Study of a Robotic Skills Curriculum for Surgical Oncology Fellows.

Authors:  Sarwat B Ahmad; MaryJoe Rice; Cecilia Chang; Ahmad Hamad; T Peter Kingham; Jin He; Jose M Pimiento; Amer H Zureikat; Herbert J Zeh; Melissa E Hogg
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 4.339

4.  The Learning Curve of Da Vinci Robot-Assisted Hemicolectomy for Colon Cancer: A Retrospective Study of 76 Cases at a Single Center.

Authors:  Pu Huang; Sen Li; Peng Li; Baoqing Jia
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-06-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.