Literature DB >> 34424872

MOON's Strategy for Obtaining Over Eighty Percent Follow-up at 10 Years Following ACL Reconstruction.

Robert G Marx1, Isabel A Wolfe1, Brooke E Turner2, Laura J Huston2, Caroline E Taber1, Kurt P Spindler3.   

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) study of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has achieved >80% follow-up for study subjects who were enrolled from 2002 to 2005; patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were reported at 2, 6, and 10 years through a carefully designed protocol that included surgeon involvement to encourage subjects to complete and return questionnaires. The process included emails and telephone calls from the central coordinating center, from research coordinators at each local institution, and lastly, from the subjects' surgeons for those who were less inclined to complete the follow-up. In order to quantify the effect of site and surgeon involvement, the enrollment year of 2005 was monitored for the 10-year follow-up (n = 516 subjects). In contact efforts made by the coordinating center, 73.8% (381) of study subjects were reached by the central site coordinator, contact information was verified, and questionnaires were subsequently sent, completed, and returned. An additional 54 subjects (10.5% of the overall study population) returned the questionnaire after local study site involvement, indicating the importance of individual surgeon and local site involvement to improve follow-up rates in multicenter studies in orthopaedic surgery. Follow-up rates were higher when a specific individual (the surgeon or the research coordinator) was given the task of final follow-up.
Copyright © 2021 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34424872      PMCID: PMC8813884          DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.21.00166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  20 in total

1.  Loss to follow-up in cohort studies: how much is too much?

Authors:  Vicki Kristman; Michael Manno; Pierre Côté
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Anterior cruciate ligament revision reconstruction: two-year results from the MOON cohort.

Authors:  Rick W Wright; Warren R Dunn; Annunziato Amendola; Jack T Andrish; David C Flanigan; Morgan Jones; Christopher C Kaeding; Robert G Marx; Matthew J Matava; Eric C McCarty; Richard D Parker; Armando Vidal; Michelle Wolcott; Brian R Wolf; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.757

3.  Selection Bias Due to Loss to Follow Up in Cohort Studies.

Authors:  Chanelle J Howe; Stephen R Cole; Bryan Lau; Sonia Napravnik; Joseph J Eron
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Change in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Choice and Outcomes Over Time.

Authors:  Christopher C Kaeding; Angela D Pedroza; Emily K Reinke; Laura J Huston; Timothy E Hewett; David C Flanigan; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Loss to follow-up matters.

Authors:  D W Murray; A R Britton; C J Bulstrode
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1997-03

6.  The rate of subsequent surgery and predictors after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: two- and 6-year follow-up results from a multicenter cohort.

Authors:  Carolyn M Hettrich; Warren R Dunn; Emily K Reinke; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Arthroplasty studies with greater than 1000 participants: analysis of follow-up methods.

Authors:  Muhammad B Tariq; José F Vega; Robert Westermann; Morgan Jones; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2019-05-07

8.  Class or level of evidence: epidemiologic basis.

Authors:  Joseph Dettori
Journal:  Evid Based Spine Care J       Date:  2012-08

9.  Study types and bias-Don't judge a study by the abstract's conclusion alone.

Authors:  Daniel C Norvell
Journal:  Evid Based Spine Care J       Date:  2010-08

Review 10.  A systematic review of the effect of retention methods in population-based cohort studies.

Authors:  Cara L Booker; Seeromanie Harding; Michaela Benzeval
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.