| Literature DB >> 28837002 |
Kasper Schei1, Ekaterina Avershina2, Torbjørn Øien3, Knut Rudi2, Turid Follestad3, Saideh Salamati4, Rønnaug Astri Ødegård5,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The fungi in the gastrointestinal tract, the gut mycobiota, are now recognised as a significant part of the gut microbiota, and they may be important to human health. In contrast to the adult gut mycobiota, the establishment of the early gut mycobiota has never been described, and there is little knowledge about the fungal transfer from mother to offspring.Entities:
Keywords: Fungi; Gut microbiota; Infant; Infant health; Mycobiota; Newborn; Probiotics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28837002 PMCID: PMC5571498 DOI: 10.1186/s40168-017-0319-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiome ISSN: 2049-2618 Impact factor: 14.650
Maternal and offspring characteristics
| Maternal age at delivery (years (SD)) | 29.6 (± 3.9) |
| Caesarean sections | 12.8% |
| Probiotic users | 49.4% |
| Antibiotic therapy during pregnancy | 7.2% |
| Male offspring | 46.4% |
| Gestational age (weeks (SD)) | 40.4 (± 1.5) |
| Birth weight (kg (SD)) | 3.6 (± 0.4) |
| Birth length (cm (SD)) | 50.7 (± 3.3) |
| Breast-fed at 3 months | 97.1% |
| Formula-fed at 3 months | 6.5% |
| Proportion of children receiving antibiotic treatment within | |
| - 6 weeks | 6.3% |
| - 1 year | 17.2% |
| - 2 years | 44.4% |
DNA quantification and 18 rRNA gene ITS1 region sequencing of faecal samples
| Pregnant | Postpartum | 10 days | 3 months | 1 year | 2 years | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All faecal samples (count) | 248 | 253 | 274 | 246 | 247 | 248 | 1516 |
| Detected fungal ITS1 | 221 (89%) | 220 (87%) | 153 (54%) | 148 (60%) | 163 (66%) | 189 (76%) | 1094 (72%) |
| Sequenced samples | 47 (19%) | 27 (11%) | 28 (10%) | 4 (2%) | 7 (3%) | 12 (5%) | 125 (8%) |
| Passed rarefaction and taxonomic classification | 28 (11%) | 25 (10%) | 15 (6%) | 4 (2%) | 7 (3%) | 11 (4%) | 90 (6%) |
Fig. 1Detection of fungal ITS DNA. The counts of samples with detected and non-detected fungal ITS DNA for each age group. The detection limit was set to a higher fungal ITS concentration than the negative control or within a CT value of 45 cycles
Fig. 2Fungal ITS DNA concentration in maternal and offspring faecal samples. A scatter plot of the fungal ITS DNA concentrations (log ITS copies per mL, mean and 95% CI). The concentration of the ITS copies quantifies the amounts of fungi in the samples
Fig. 3Alpha and beta diversity for the faecal samples. A scatter plot of the diversities; red whiskers designate the median and interquartile ranges. a Alpha diversity as Simpson’s reciprocal index. The Simpson reciprocal index describes how many OTUs prevail in each sample [36]. b The observed species index describes the sample richness, i.e. how many OTUs are detected in each sample. c The beta diversity as Bray-Curtis Distance describes the between-sample diversity from 0 to 1
Fig. 4a–c OTU abundances for all groups. Bar charts of the relatively most abundant OTUs in a mothers, b offspring from 10 days to 3 months and c offspring for 1–2 years. Each coloured box represents an OTU. The individual fungal ITS DNA concentration is on top of each bar
Fig. 5Overlapping OTUs between pregnant woman and their offspring. The counts of overlapping OTUs in five mother-offspring pairs from the sequencing of the 18S rRNA gene ITS1 regions