| Literature DB >> 20072605 |
Mahmoud A Ghannoum1, Richard J Jurevic, Pranab K Mukherjee, Fan Cui, Masoumeh Sikaroodi, Ammar Naqvi, Patrick M Gillevet.
Abstract
The oral microbiome-organisms residing in the oral cavity and their collective genome-are critical components of health and disease. The fungal component of the oral microbiota has not been characterized. In this study, we used a novel multitag pyrosequencing approach to characterize fungi present in the oral cavity of 20 healthy individuals, using the pan-fungal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) primers. Our results revealed the "basal" oral mycobiome profile of the enrolled individuals, and showed that across all the samples studied, the oral cavity contained 74 culturable and 11 non-culturable fungal genera. Among these genera, 39 were present in only one person, 16 genera were present in two participants, and 5 genera were present in three people, while 15 genera (including non-culturable organisms) were present in >/=4 (20%) participants. Candida species were the most frequent (isolated from 75% of participants), followed by Cladosporium (65%), Aureobasidium, Saccharomycetales (50% for both), Aspergillus (35%), Fusarium (30%), and Cryptococcus (20%). Four of these predominant genera are known to be pathogenic in humans. The low-abundance genera may represent environmental fungi present in the oral cavity and could simply be spores inhaled from the air or material ingested with food. Among the culturable genera, 61 were represented by one species each, while 13 genera comprised between 2 and 6 different species; the total number of species identified were 101. The number of species in the oral cavity of each individual ranged between 9 and 23. Principal component (PCO) analysis of the obtained data set followed by sample clustering and UniFrac analysis revealed that White males and Asian males clustered differently from each other, whereas both Asian and White females clustered together. This is the first study that identified the "basal mycobiome" of healthy individuals, and provides the basis for a detailed characterization of the oral mycobiome in health and disease.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20072605 PMCID: PMC2795202 DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000713
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Pathog ISSN: 1553-7366 Impact factor: 6.823
Summary of demographic characteristics and sequencing information for study participants.
| Sample ID | Sample Collection Date | Age | Gender | Ethnicity |
| A1 | 16-May | 43 | F | Asian |
| A2 | 16-May | 55 | M | White |
| A3 | 16-May | 35 | M | Asian |
| B1 | 16-May | 21 | F | Asian |
| B2 | 16-May | 56 | M | White |
| B3 | 16-May | 39 | F | Asian |
| C1 | 16-May | 22 | F | White |
| C2 | 16-May | 31 | F | Asian |
| C3 | 16-May | 35 | M | Asian |
| D1 | 16-May | 60 | M | Asian |
| D2 | 16-May | 50 | M | Asian |
| E1 | 21-May | 44 | M | Asian |
| E2 | 21-May | 25 | F | African-American |
| E3 | 21-May | 24 | F | White |
| F1 | 21-May | 24 | F | African-American |
| F2 | 21-May | 26 | M | White |
| G1 | 21-May | 56 | M | White |
| G2 | 21-May | 35 | M | Asian |
| G3 | 21-May | 55 | M | White |
| H2 | 21-May | 26 | M | White |
Summary of pyrosequencing analysis.
| Sample ID | Number of Reads | Average Read Length |
| A1 | 1819 | 246 |
| A2 | 2546 | 263 |
| A3 | 1961 | 231 |
| B1 | 3688 | 251 |
| B2 | 2528 | 254 |
| B3 | 815 | 254 |
| C1 | 1392 | 256 |
| C2 | 2739 | 271 |
| C3 | 1202 | 269 |
| D1 | 2185 | 259 |
| D2 | 1359 | 217 |
| E1 | 1890 | 218 |
| E2 | 559 | 265 |
| E3 | 1595 | 254 |
| F1 | 1249 | 211 |
| F2 | 2357 | 243 |
| G1 | 615 | 257 |
| G2 | 1339 | 252 |
| G3 | 976 | 241 |
| H2 | 1228 | 247 |
|
|
|
|
Figure 1Frequency distribution of identified fungal genera among the study participants.
Figure 2Overall distribution of fungi in oral rinse samples obtained from 20 healthy individuals.
The triangle and asterisk indicate samples containing 16 and 3 fungal genera, respectively. See Table 1 for sample details.
Figure 3Frequency of fungal genera present in more than 20 percent of the tested samples.
Distribution of different fungal species in oral mycobiome of healthy individuals.
| Fungal genera | Species | Frequency |
|
|
| 2 |
|
| 1 | |
|
|
| 2 |
|
| 1 | |
|
| 1 | |
|
| 1 | |
|
| 1 | |
|
| 2 | |
|
|
| 8 |
|
| 1 | |
|
| 1 | |
|
| 3 | |
|
| 3 | |
|
|
| 10 |
|
| 2 | |
|
| 1 | |
|
| 1 | |
|
|
| 1 |
|
| 1 | |
|
|
| 2 |
|
| 1 | |
|
| 1 | |
|
|
| 1 |
|
| 3 | |
|
|
| 1 |
|
| 1 | |
|
|
| 1 |
|
| 1 | |
|
| 1 | |
|
|
| 1 |
|
| 1 | |
|
|
| 2 |
|
| 6 | |
|
| 2 | |
|
|
| 1 |
|
| 1 | |
|
|
| 1 |
|
| 1 |
Figure 4Principal component (PCO) analysis of distribution of fungal genera in oral samples of 20 healthy individuals.
UniFrac analysis of data belonging to clusters of females, White males, and Asian males.
| Asian Males | Females | White Males | |
| Asian Males | 0 | < = 0.03 | < = 0.03 |
| Females | < = 0.03 | 0 | < = 0.03 |
| White Males | < = 0.03 | < = 0.03 | 0 |