Literature DB >> 2883105

Further evidence for genetic heterogeneity in the fragile X syndrome.

W T Brown, E C Jenkins, A C Gross, C B Chan, M S Krawczun, C J Duncan, S L Sklower, G S Fisch.   

Abstract

The X-linked fragile X [fra(X)] syndrome, associated with a fragile site at Xq27.3, is the most common Mendelian inherited form of mental deficiency. Approximately 1 in 1060 males and 1 in 677 females carry the fra(X) chromosome. However, diagnosis of carrier status can be difficult since about 20% of males and 44% of females are nonpenetrant for mental impairment and/or expression of fra(X). We analyzed DNA from 327 individuals in 23 families segregating fra(X) for linkage to three flanking polymorphic probes: 52A, F9, and ST14. This allowed probable nonpenetrant, transmitting males and carrier females to be identified. A combined linkage analysis was conducted using these families and published probe information on F9 in 27 other families, 52A in six families, and ST14 in five families. The two-point recombination fraction for 52A-F9 was 0.13 (90% confidence interval, 0.10-0.16), for F9-fra(X) was 0.21 (0.17-0.24), and for fra(X)-ST14 was 0.12 (0.07-0.17). Tight linkage between F9 and fra(X) was observed in some families; in others loose linkage was seen suggesting genetic linkage heterogeneity. Risk analysis of carrier status using flanking DNA probes showed that probable nonpenetrant transmitting males were included in families showing both tight and loose linkage. Thus, in contrast to our previous conclusions, it appears that the presence or absence of nonpenetrant, transmitting males in a family is not an indicator of heterogeneity. To determine if heterogeneity was present, we employed the admixture test. Evidence for linkage heterogeneity between F9 and fra(X) was found, significant at P less than 0.0005. Nonsignificant heterogeneity was seen for 52A-F9 linkage. No heterogeneity was found for fra(X)-ST14. The frequency of fra(X) expression was significantly lower in families with tight F9-fra(X) linkage than in families with loose linkage. Cognition appeared to relate to linkage type: affected males in tight linkage families had higher IQs than those in loose linkage families. These findings of genetic heterogeneity can account in part for the high prevalence and apparent high new mutation rate of fra(X). They will affect genetic counseling using RFLPs. An understanding of the basis for genetic heterogeneity in fra(X) will help to clarify the nature of the unusual pattern of inheritance seen in this syndrome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2883105     DOI: 10.1007/bf00284100

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  42 in total

1.  The detection and estimation of linkage between the genes for elliptocytosis and the Rh blood type.

Authors:  N E MORTON
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1956-06       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Evidence against close linkage of the loci for fraXq of Martin-Bell syndrome and for factor IX.

Authors:  B Zoll; J Arnemann; M Krawczak; D N Cooper; G Pescia; W Wahli; P Steinbach; J Schmidtke
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Linkage studies of X-linked mental retardation: high frequency of recombination in the telomeric region of the human X chromosome (fragile site/linkage/recombination/X chromosome).

Authors:  K E Davies; M G Mattei; J F Mattei; H Veenema; S McGlade; K Harper; N Tommerup; K B Nielsen; M Mikkelsen; P Beighton
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Recombination and amplification of pyrimidine-rich sequences may be responsible for initiation and progression of the Xq27 fragile site: an hypothesis.

Authors:  R L Nussbaum; S D Airhart; D H Ledbetter
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1986 Jan-Feb

Review 5.  The prenatal detection of the fragile X chromosome: review of recent experience.

Authors:  E C Jenkins; W T Brown; M G Wilson; M S Lin; O S Alfi; E R Wassman; J Brooks; C J Duncan; A Masia; M S Krawczun
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1986 Jan-Feb

6.  The marker (X) syndrome: a cytogenetic and genetic analysis.

Authors:  S L Sherman; N E Morton; P A Jacobs; G Turner
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 1.670

7.  Prenatal diagnosis of X-linked mental retardation with fragile (X) using fetoscopy and fetal blood sampling.

Authors:  T Webb; C M Gosden; C H Rodeck; M A Hamill; P E Eason
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1983 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 3.050

8.  High resolution banding and the locus of the Xq fragile site.

Authors:  R Brookwell; G Turner
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  The genetic linkage map of the human X chromosome.

Authors:  D Drayna; R White
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-11-15       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  X-linkage and genetic heterogeneity in bipolar-related major affective illness: reanalysis of linkage data.

Authors:  N Risch; M Baron
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 1.670

View more
  17 in total

1.  An estimating function approach to linkage heterogeneity.

Authors:  He Gao; Ying Zhou; Weijun Ma; Haidong Liu; Linan Zhao
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.166

2.  Genetic mapping of two new DNA markers in Xq26-q28 relative to the fragile-X syndrome locus.

Authors:  R Sood; L M Mulligan; R Poon; B N White; J J Holden
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 3.  The fragile X: progress toward solving the puzzle.

Authors:  W T Brown
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Study of a family with a fragile site of the X chromosome at Xq27-28 without mental retardation.

Authors:  M A Voelckel; N Philip; C Piquet; M C Pellissier; I Oberlé; F Birg; M G Mattei; J F Mattei
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  A new statistical test for linkage heterogeneity.

Authors:  N Risch
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Recombination and the fragile X.

Authors:  G K Suthers; G R Sutherland
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  The role of recombination in the evolvement of the fragile X mutation.

Authors:  T Schaap
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Multilocus analysis of the fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  W T Brown; A Gross; C Chan; E C Jenkins; J L Mandel; I Oberlé; B Arveiler; G Novelli; S Thibodeau; R Hagerman
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Interpretation of the heterogeneity in the linkage relationships of DNA markers around the fragile X locus.

Authors:  R Winter; M Pembrey
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Hypothesis regarding the nature of the fragile X mutation. A reply to Winter and Pembrey.

Authors:  W T Brown; S L Sherman; C S Dobkin
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 4.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.