Literature DB >> 6712153

The marker (X) syndrome: a cytogenetic and genetic analysis.

S L Sherman, N E Morton, P A Jacobs, G Turner.   

Abstract

The results of a cytogenetic and segregation analysis of 110 pedigrees of the mar (X) syndrome are reported. The cytogenetic study indicated an inverse relationship between IQ and the mar(X) frequency in females but not in males. A small but significant effect of age on mar(X) frequency was observed in both males and females, but in females it was restricted to those of normal intelligence, retarded females showing no significant effect. Classical segregation analysis was performed using the program SEGRAN, analysing sexes separately. A 20% deficit of affected males was observed, the most plausible explanation for the majority of these cases being incomplete penetrance. Since this was an unexpected result, the data were scrutinized for possible biases; however, correction of these had little effect on the estimate. The penetrance of mental impairment in carrier females was estimated to be 30% and of mental impairment and/or mar(X) expression to be 56%. Thus 44% of carriers cannot be detected with our definition of affection. No evidence for sporadic cases among affected males was found. Complex segregation analysis was performed using the sex-linked version of POINTER, analysing sexes together. This was done in order to test the results from classical segregation analysis, to test for family resemblance and to estimate mutation rates. It was confirmed that there was a 20% deficit of affected males, that penetrance of mental impairment in females was approximately 30% and that there was no evidence for sporadic males. Thus all males with the gene appear to have received it from their carrier mothers and all mutations must occur in sperm. The mutation rate in sperm was estimated to be as high as 7.2 X 10(-4), implying that over one-half of random carrier females are fresh mutants. Our results have important implications for genetic counseling as they imply that all mothers of isolated affected males are carriers, that normal brothers of affected males have a 17% chance of carrying the gene and transmitting it to all their daughters, and that normal sisters of affected males have, at most, a 30% chance of being carriers. Since there are biases in the data due to the testing of particular individuals, these probabilities must be considered approximations until they are independently confirmed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6712153     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1984.tb00830.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hum Genet        ISSN: 0003-4800            Impact factor:   1.670


  106 in total

1.  A compelling genetic hypothesis for a complex disease: PRODH2/DGCR6 variation leads to schizophrenia susceptibility.

Authors:  Aravinda Chakravarti
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Estimating the stability of the proposed imprinted state of the fragile-X mutation when transmitted by females.

Authors:  P J Follette; C D Laird
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 3.  Molecular analysis of the fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  M C Hirst; S M Knight; Y Nakahori; A Roche; K E Davies
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.982

4.  A YAC contig across the fragile X site defines the region of fragility.

Authors:  M C Hirst; K Rack; Y Nakahori; A Roche; M V Bell; G Flynn; Z Christadoulou; R N MacKinnon; M Francis; A J Littler
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1991-06-25       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Role of maternal gesture use in speech use by children with fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Laura J Hahn; B Jean Zimmer; Nancy C Brady; Rebecca E Swinburne Romine; Kandace K Fleming
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  Anticipation legitimized: unstable DNA to the rescue.

Authors:  G R Sutherland; R I Richards
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  A microdeletion of less than 250 kb, including the proximal part of the FMR-I gene and the fragile-X site, in a male with the clinical phenotype of fragile-X syndrome.

Authors:  D Wöhrle; D Kotzot; M C Hirst; A Manca; B Korn; A Schmidt; G Barbi; H D Rott; A Poustka; K E Davies
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  A community study of severe mental retardation in the West Midlands and the importance of the fragile X chromosome in its aetiology.

Authors:  S Bundey; T P Webb; A Thake; J Todd
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 6.318

9.  Prevalence of the fragile X syndrome in four birth cohorts of children of school age.

Authors:  M Kähkönen; T Alitalo; E Airaksinen; R Matilainen; K Launiala; S Autio; J Leisti
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 4.132

10.  Neurobehavioral effects of the fragile X premutation in adult women: a controlled study.

Authors:  A L Reiss; L Freund; M T Abrams; C Boehm; H Kazazian
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.