Literature DB >> 25592148

Toward a science of tumor forecasting for clinical oncology.

Thomas E Yankeelov1, Vito Quaranta2, Katherine J Evans3, Erin C Rericha4.   

Abstract

We propose that the quantitative cancer biology community makes a concerted effort to apply lessons from weather forecasting to develop an analogous methodology for predicting and evaluating tumor growth and treatment response. Currently, the time course of tumor response is not predicted; instead, response is only assessed post hoc by physical examination or imaging methods. This fundamental practice within clinical oncology limits optimization of a treatment regimen for an individual patient, as well as to determine in real time whether the choice was in fact appropriate. This is especially frustrating at a time when a panoply of molecularly targeted therapies is available, and precision genetic or proteomic analyses of tumors are an established reality. By learning from the methods of weather and climate modeling, we submit that the forecasting power of biophysical and biomathematical modeling can be harnessed to hasten the arrival of a field of predictive oncology. With a successful methodology toward tumor forecasting, it should be possible to integrate large tumor-specific datasets of varied types and effectively defeat one cancer patient at a time. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25592148      PMCID: PMC4359948          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-2233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  28 in total

1.  Predicting the course of Gompertzian growth.

Authors:  L Norton; R Simon; H D Brereton; A E Bogden
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976-12-09       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Mathematical modeling in cancer drug discovery.

Authors:  Zhihui Wang; Thomas S Deisboeck
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 7.851

Review 3.  Cancer log-kill revisited.

Authors:  Larry Norton
Journal:  Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book       Date:  2014

Review 4.  Reappraising antiangiogenic therapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Robert S Kerbel
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.380

5.  Optimization of dosing for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer with evolutionary cancer modeling.

Authors:  Juliann Chmielecki; Jasmine Foo; Geoffrey R Oxnard; Katherine Hutchinson; Kadoaki Ohashi; Romel Somwar; Lu Wang; Katherine R Amato; Maria Arcila; Martin L Sos; Nicholas D Socci; Agnes Viale; Elisa de Stanchina; Michelle S Ginsberg; Roman K Thomas; Mark G Kris; Akira Inoue; Marc Ladanyi; Vincent A Miller; Franziska Michor; William Pao
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 17.956

6.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy lessens surgical morbidity in advanced ovarian cancer and leads to improved survival in stage IV disease.

Authors:  June Y Hou; Michael G Kelly; Herbert Yu; Jessica N McAlpine; Masoud Azodi; Thomas J Rutherford; Peter E Schwartz
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-01-18       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Mathematical Oncology: How Are the Mathematical and Physical Sciences Contributing to the War on Breast Cancer?

Authors:  Arnaud H Chauviere; Haralampos Hatzikirou; John S Lowengrub; Hermann B Frieboes; Alastair M Thompson; Vittorio Cristini
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2010-07-22

8.  A mechanically coupled reaction-diffusion model for predicting the response of breast tumors to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jared A Weis; Michael I Miga; Lori R Arlinghaus; Xia Li; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Vandana Abramson; Jaime Farley; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  From patient-specific mathematical neuro-oncology to precision medicine.

Authors:  A L Baldock; R C Rockne; A D Boone; M L Neal; A Hawkins-Daarud; D M Corwin; C A Bridge; L A Guyman; A D Trister; M M Mrugala; J K Rockhill; K R Swanson
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 10.  Current advances in mathematical modeling of anti-cancer drug penetration into tumor tissues.

Authors:  Munju Kim; Robert J Gillies; Katarzyna A Rejniak
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 6.244

View more
  33 in total

1.  Calibrating a Predictive Model of Tumor Growth and Angiogenesis with Quantitative MRI.

Authors:  David A Hormuth; Angela M Jarrett; Xinzeng Feng; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 2.  Mechanism-Based Modeling of Tumor Growth and Treatment Response Constrained by Multiparametric Imaging Data.

Authors:  David A Hormuth; Angela M Jarrett; Ernesto A B F Lima; Matthew T McKenna; David T Fuentes; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2019-02

3.  Three-dimensional Image-based Mechanical Modeling for Predicting the Response of Breast Cancer to Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Authors:  Jared A Weis; Michael I Miga; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 6.756

4.  Proliferation saturation index in an adaptive Bayesian approach to predict patient-specific radiotherapy responses.

Authors:  Enakshi D Sunassee; Dean Tan; Nathan Ji; Renee Brady; Eduardo G Moros; Jimmy J Caudell; Slav Yartsev; Heiko Enderling
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 2.694

Review 5.  Translating preclinical MRI methods to clinical oncology.

Authors:  David A Hormuth; Anna G Sorace; John Virostko; Richard G Abramson; Zaver M Bhujwalla; Pedro Enriquez-Navas; Robert Gillies; John D Hazle; Ralph P Mason; C Chad Quarles; Jared A Weis; Jennifer G Whisenant; Junzhong Xu; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Mathematical modelling of trastuzumab-induced immune response in an in vivo murine model of HER2+ breast cancer.

Authors:  Angela M Jarrett; Meghan J Bloom; Wesley Godfrey; Anum K Syed; David A Ekrut; Lauren I Ehrlich; Thomas E Yankeelov; Anna G Sorace
Journal:  Math Med Biol       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 1.854

7.  Selection, calibration, and validation of models of tumor growth.

Authors:  E A B F Lima; J T Oden; D A Hormuth; T E Yankeelov; R C Almeida
Journal:  Math Models Methods Appl Sci       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.817

8.  Voxel Forecast for Precision Oncology: Predicting Spatially Variant and Multiscale Cancer Therapy Response on Longitudinal Quantitative Molecular Imaging.

Authors:  Stephen R Bowen; Daniel S Hippe; W Art Chaovalitwongse; Chunyan Duan; Phawis Thammasorn; Xiao Liu; Robert S Miyaoka; Hubert J Vesselle; Paul E Kinahan; Ramesh Rengan; Jing Zeng
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Selection and Validation of Predictive Models of Radiation Effects on Tumor Growth Based on Noninvasive Imaging Data.

Authors:  E A B F Lima; J T Oden; B Wohlmuth; A Shahmoradi; D A Hormuth; T E Yankeelov; L Scarabosio; T Horger
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 6.756

Review 10.  The mathematics of cancer: integrating quantitative models.

Authors:  Philipp M Altrock; Lin L Liu; Franziska Michor
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 60.716

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.