Elsayed Elshamy 1,2 , Ahmed Nofal 1 , Dalia Ibrrahim 1 Show Affiliations »
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare between postplacental insertion of levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus copper intrauterine device regarding expulsion rates, patient satisfaction, complications, and continuation rates. METHODS: This prospective observational study was conducted on 1100 participants divided in to two groups: group (1) CU-IUD group and group (2) LNG-IUS group where women were assigned for postplacental insertion of either CU-IUD or LNG-IUS, respectively. Follow-up at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months postpartum and data were collected and analyzed to evaluate outcomes. RESULTS: No statistical difference between both groups regarding patients' characteristics, the overall expulsion rate was higher in LNS-IUS group than CU-IUD group; 77 patients (14%) and 50 patients (9%), respectively, (P value < 0.05), odds ratio: 1.63 at CI: (1.12-2.37). No significant difference between the two groups regarding pain intensity, perforation, abnormal uterine bleeding, and clinical endometritis (P > 0.05). Overall satisfaction rate at six months was 478(87%) in the CU-IUD group and 472(85.8%) in the LNS-IUS group (P value > 0.05), odds ratio: 1.1 at CI: (0.78-1.55). Continuation rate at s6 months was comparable between the two groups 485 (88.2%) and 480 (87.3%) in CU-IUD group and LNS-IUS group respectively, (P value < 0.05), odds ratio: 1.09 at CI: (0.76-1.56). CONCLUSION: The rate of expulsion of LNG-IUS is higher than copper IUD when inserted postplacental, yet the continuation and acceptability rates were comparable between the two groups. © Federation of Obstetric & Gynecological Societies of India 2021.
PURPOSE: To compare between postplacental insertion of levonorgestrel intrauterine system versus copper intrauterine device regarding expulsion rates, patient satisfaction, complications, and continuation rates. METHODS: This prospective observational study was conducted on 1100 participants divided in to two groups: group (1) CU-IUD group and group (2) LNG-IUS group where women were assigned for postplacental insertion of either CU-IUD or LNG-IUS, respectively. Follow-up at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months postpartum and data were collected and analyzed to evaluate outcomes. RESULTS: No statistical difference between both groups regarding patients' characteristics, the overall expulsion rate was higher in LNS-IUS group than CU-IUD group; 77 patients (14%) and 50 patients (9%), respectively, (P value < 0.05), odds ratio: 1.63 at CI: (1.12-2.37). No significant difference between the two groups regarding pain intensity, perforation, abnormal uterine bleeding, and clinical endometritis (P > 0.05). Overall satisfaction rate at six months was 478(87%) in the CU-IUD group and 472(85.8%) in the LNS-IUS group (P value > 0.05), odds ratio: 1.1 at CI: (0.78-1.55). Continuation rate at s6 months was comparable between the two groups 485 (88.2%) and 480 (87.3%) in CU-IUD group and LNS-IUS group respectively, (P value < 0.05), odds ratio: 1.09 at CI: (0.76-1.56). CONCLUSION: The rate of expulsion of LNG-IUS is higher than copper IUD when inserted postplacental, yet the continuation and acceptability rates were comparable between the two groups. © Federation of Obstetric & Gynecological Societies of India 2021.
Entities: Chemical
Keywords:
IUD expulsion; Intrauterine device; Levonorgestrel intrauterine system; Long-acting reversible contraception; Postpartum contraception; Postplacental IUD
Year: 2021
PMID： 34149217 PMCID： PMC8166987 DOI： 10.1007/s13224-020-01409-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Obstet Gynaecol India ISSN： 0975-6434