Literature DB >> 30458951

A Machine Learning Approach to Identify NIH-Funded Applied Prevention Research.

Jennifer Villani1, Sheri D Schully2, Payam Meyer3, Ranell L Myles2, Jocelyn A Lee2, David M Murray2, Ashley J Vargas2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To fulfill its mission, the NIH Office of Disease Prevention systematically monitors NIH investments in applied prevention research. Specifically, the Office focuses on research in humans involving primary and secondary prevention, and prevention-related methods. Currently, the NIH uses the Research, Condition, and Disease Categorization system to report agency funding in prevention research. However, this system defines prevention research broadly to include primary and secondary prevention, studies on prevention methods, and basic and preclinical studies for prevention. A new methodology was needed to quantify NIH funding in applied prevention research.
METHODS: A novel machine learning approach was developed and evaluated for its ability to characterize NIH-funded applied prevention research during fiscal years 2012-2015. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, accuracy, and F1 score of the machine learning method; the Research, Condition, and Disease Categorization system; and a combined approach were estimated. Analyses were completed during June-August 2017.
RESULTS: Because the machine learning method was trained to recognize applied prevention research, it more accurately identified applied prevention grants (F1 = 72.7%) than the Research, Condition, and Disease Categorization system (F1 = 54.4%) and a combined approach (F1 = 63.5%) with p<0.001.
CONCLUSIONS: This analysis demonstrated the use of machine learning as an efficient method to classify NIH-funded research grants in disease prevention. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30458951      PMCID: PMC6251715          DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.07.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  11 in total

1.  The concept of prevention: a good idea gone astray?

Authors:  B Starfield; J Hyde; J Gérvas; I Heath
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Building on "The concept of prevention: a good idea gone astray?".

Authors:  J E Ataguba; G Mooney
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Enhancing the Quality of Prevention Research Supported by the National Institutes of Health.

Authors:  David M Murray; Wilma Peterman Cross; Denise Simons-Morton; Jody Engel; Barry Portnoy; Jessica Wu; Paris A Watson; Susanne Olkkola
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Machine Learning for Social Services: A Study of Prenatal Case Management in Illinois.

Authors:  Ian Pan; Laura B Nolan; Rashida R Brown; Romana Khan; Paul van der Boor; Daniel G Harris; Rayid Ghani
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Mortality risk score prediction in an elderly population using machine learning.

Authors:  Sherri Rose
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Predicting Sexual Assault Perpetration in the U.S. Army Using Administrative Data.

Authors:  Anthony J Rosellini; John Monahan; Amy E Street; Maria V Petukhova; Nancy A Sampson; David M Benedek; Paul Bliese; Murray B Stein; Robert J Ursano; Ronald C Kessler
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Using natural language processing to improve efficiency of manual chart abstraction in research: the case of breast cancer recurrence.

Authors:  David S Carrell; Scott Halgrim; Diem-Thy Tran; Diana S M Buist; Jessica Chubak; Wendy W Chapman; Guergana Savova
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Assessment of genetic and nongenetic interactions for the prediction of depressive symptomatology: an analysis of the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study using machine learning algorithms.

Authors:  Nicholas S Roetker; C David Page; James A Yonker; Vicky Chang; Carol L Roan; Pamela Herd; Taissa S Hauser; Robert M Hauser; Craig S Atwood
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Computational approaches for predicting biomedical research collaborations.

Authors:  Qing Zhang; Hong Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A review for detecting gene-gene interactions using machine learning methods in genetic epidemiology.

Authors:  Ching Lee Koo; Mei Jing Liew; Mohd Saberi Mohamad; Abdul Hakim Mohamed Salleh
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-10-21       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  4 in total

1.  NIH Primary and Secondary Prevention Research in Humans During 2012-2017.

Authors:  David M Murray; Jennifer Villani; Ashley J Vargas; Jocelyn A Lee; Ranell L Myles; Jessica Y Wu; Patricia L Mabry; Sheri D Schully
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Diet and Physical Activity Prevention Research Supported by the U.S. NIH From 2012-2017.

Authors:  Ashley J Vargas; Kyle Sprow; Jennifer L Lerman; Jennifer Villani; Karen S Regan; Rachel M Ballard
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Assessment of Prevention Research Measuring Leading Risk Factors and Causes of Mortality and Disability Supported by the US National Institutes of Health.

Authors:  Ashley J Vargas; Sheri D Schully; Jennifer Villani; Luis Ganoza Caballero; David M Murray
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-11-01

4.  Sustainability planning in the US response to the opioid crisis: An examination using expert and text mining approaches.

Authors:  Carlos Gallo; Karen Abram; Nanette Hannah; Lauren Caton; Barbara Cimaglio; Mark McGovern; C Hendricks Brown
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.