Yunlu Tao1, Yang Hua1,2, Lingyun Jia1,2, Liqun Jiao3, Beibei Liu1. 1. Department of Vascular Ultrasonography, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. 2. Center of Vascular Ultrasonography, Beijing Institute of Brain Disorders, Beijing, China. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Stent residual stenosis is an independent risk factor for restenosis after stenting. This study aimed to analyze the factors influencing residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting (CAS). Methods: A total of 570 patients who underwent CAS with 159 closed-loop stents (CLS) and 411 open-loop stents (OLS) from January 2013 to January 2016 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Carotid stenosis location in the common carotid artery or in internal carotid artery, plaque size, and features (regular or irregular morphology; with or without calcification), degree of carotid artery stenosis, and stent expansion rate were detected by carotid duplex ultrasonography. Residual stenosis was defined as a stenosis rate ≥30% after CAS, as detected by digital subtraction angiography. A logistic regression analysis was used to analyze residual stenosis risk factors. Results: The overall incidence of residual stenosis was 22.8% (130/570 stents). The incidence of residual stenosis in the CLS group was higher than that in the OLS group (29.5 vs. 20.2%, χ2 = 5.71, P = 0.017). The logistic regression analysis showed that CLS [odds ratio (OR), 1.933; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.009-3.702], irregular plaques (OR, 4.237; 95% CI, 2.391-7.742), and plaques with calcification (OR, 2.370; 95% CI, 1.337-4.199) were independent risk factors for residual stenosis after CAS. In addition, a high radial expansion rate of stent was a protective factor for residual stenosis (OR, 0.171; 95% CI, 0.123-0.238). The stenosis location and stent length did not impact the occurrence of residual stenosis. After 1-year follow-up, the incidence of restenosis in the residual stenosis group was higher than that in the group without residual stenosis (13.1 vs. 2.0%, χ2 = 28.05, P < 0.001). Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest that plaque morphology, echo characteristics (with calcification), and stents type influence residual stenosis.
Background and purpose: Stent residual stenosis is an independent risk factor for restenosis after stenting. This study aimed to analyze the factors influencing residual stenosis after carotid artery stenting (CAS). Methods: A total of 570 patients who underwent CAS with 159 closed-loop stents (CLS) and 411 open-loop stents (OLS) from January 2013 to January 2016 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Carotid stenosis location in the common carotid artery or in internal carotid artery, plaque size, and features (regular or irregular morphology; with or without calcification), degree of carotid artery stenosis, and stent expansion rate were detected by carotid duplex ultrasonography. Residual stenosis was defined as a stenosis rate ≥30% after CAS, as detected by digital subtraction angiography. A logistic regression analysis was used to analyze residual stenosis risk factors. Results: The overall incidence of residual stenosis was 22.8% (130/570 stents). The incidence of residual stenosis in the CLS group was higher than that in the OLS group (29.5 vs. 20.2%, χ2 = 5.71, P = 0.017). The logistic regression analysis showed that CLS [odds ratio (OR), 1.933; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.009-3.702], irregular plaques (OR, 4.237; 95% CI, 2.391-7.742), and plaques with calcification (OR, 2.370; 95% CI, 1.337-4.199) were independent risk factors for residual stenosis after CAS. In addition, a high radial expansion rate of stent was a protective factor for residual stenosis (OR, 0.171; 95% CI, 0.123-0.238). The stenosis location and stent length did not impact the occurrence of residual stenosis. After 1-year follow-up, the incidence of restenosis in the residual stenosis group was higher than that in the group without residual stenosis (13.1 vs. 2.0%, χ2 = 28.05, P < 0.001). Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest that plaque morphology, echo characteristics (with calcification), and stents type influence residual stenosis.
Authors: Eric R Bates; Joseph D Babb; Donald E Casey; Christopher U Cates; Gary R Duckwiler; Ted E Feldman; William A Gray; Kenneth Ouriel; Eric D Peterson; Kenneth Rosenfield; John H Rundback; Robert D Safian; Michael A Sloan; Christopher J White Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2007-01-02 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: S Kohyama; K Kazekawa; M Iko; H Aikawa; M Tsutsumi; Y Go; S Nagata; T Kodama; K Nii; S Matsubara; A Tanaka Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Thomas G Brott; David Calvet; George Howard; John Gregson; Ale Algra; Jean-Pierre Becquemin; Gert J de Borst; Richard Bulbulia; Hans-Henning Eckstein; Gustav Fraedrich; Jacoba P Greving; Alison Halliday; Jeroen Hendrikse; Olav Jansen; Jenifer H Voeks; Peter A Ringleb; Jean-Louis Mas; Martin M Brown; Leo H Bonati Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2019-02-06 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Ján Sýkora; Kamil Zeleňák; Martin Vorčák; Martin Števík; Martina Sýkorová; Jozef Sivák; Marek Rovňák; Jana Zapletalová; Juraj Mužík; Igor Šinák; Egon Kurča; Lukas Meyer; Jens Fiehler Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2022-07-07 Impact factor: 2.797
Authors: Lukas Andereggen; Sepideh Amin-Hanjani; Jürgen Beck; Markus M Luedi; Jan Gralla; Gerrit A Schubert; Angelo Tortora; Robert H Andres; Marcel Arnold; Andreas Raabe; Michael Reinert Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-06-30 Impact factor: 4.086