Jinbang Guo1,2, Xuefeng Cao1,3, Zackary I Cleveland1, Jason C Woods1,2,3. 1. Center for Pulmonary Imaging Research, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. 2. Department of Physics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. 3. Department of Physics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To measure the T2* and T1 of mouse lung at 7T via anisotropic-resolution radial ultrashort echo-time imaging with ellipsoidal k-space coverage. METHODS: Ellipsoidal field-of-view was created by expanding uniform spherical k-space coverage. The effects of T2* and ellipsoidal sampling on image resolution were investigated by using point-spread-function analysis and resolution phantoms. Finally, this ellipsoidal sampling approach was used to measure the lung T2* and T1 of healthy C57BL/6 mice at the increasingly common preclinical field strength of 7T. RESULTS: Lung parenchyma T2* of 17- to 23-week-old mice at 7T was 0.395 ± 0.033 ms. T1 of lung and left- and right-heart ventricles was 1452.5 ± 87.0 ms, 1810.5 ± 54.6 ms, and 1602.6 ± 120.9 ms, respectively. Ellipsoidal k-space sampling provides enhanced resolution for a fixed scanning time or provides equivalent (although anisotropic) spatial resolution with reduced scanning times, while simultaneously avoiding fold-in artifacts. CONCLUSION: Using these techniques, the first T2* and T1 measures of mouse lung at 7T are reported. Ultrashort echo-time imaging with ellipsoidal k-space coverage significantly increases in-plane resolution without increasing scanning time, or equivalently, decreases scanning time while maintaining equivalent in-plane resolution. Magn Reson Med 79:2254-2264, 2018.
PURPOSE: To measure the T2* and T1 of mouse lung at 7T via anisotropic-resolution radial ultrashort echo-time imaging with ellipsoidal k-space coverage. METHODS: Ellipsoidal field-of-view was created by expanding uniform spherical k-space coverage. The effects of T2* and ellipsoidal sampling on image resolution were investigated by using point-spread-function analysis and resolution phantoms. Finally, this ellipsoidal sampling approach was used to measure the lung T2* and T1 of healthy C57BL/6 mice at the increasingly common preclinical field strength of 7T. RESULTS: Lung parenchyma T2* of 17- to 23-week-old mice at 7T was 0.395 ± 0.033 ms. T1 of lung and left- and right-heart ventricles was 1452.5 ± 87.0 ms, 1810.5 ± 54.6 ms, and 1602.6 ± 120.9 ms, respectively. Ellipsoidal k-space sampling provides enhanced resolution for a fixed scanning time or provides equivalent (although anisotropic) spatial resolution with reduced scanning times, while simultaneously avoiding fold-in artifacts. CONCLUSION: Using these techniques, the first T2* and T1 measures of mouse lung at 7T are reported. Ultrashort echo-time imaging with ellipsoidal k-space coverage significantly increases in-plane resolution without increasing scanning time, or equivalently, decreases scanning time while maintaining equivalent in-plane resolution. Magn Reson Med 79:2254-2264, 2018.
Authors: Jeff H Duyn; Peter van Gelderen; Tie-Qiang Li; Jacco A de Zwart; Alan P Koretsky; Masaki Fukunaga Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-06-22 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Simon M F Triphan; Bertram J Jobst; Felix A Breuer; Mark O Wielpütz; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Jürgen Biederer; Peter M Jakob Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2015-01-21 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Francesca Pennati; James D Quirk; Dmitriy A Yablonskiy; Mario Castro; Andrea Aliverti; Jason C Woods Journal: Radiology Date: 2014-06-15 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Jinbang Guo; William D Hardie; Zackary I Cleveland; Cynthia Davidson; Xuefeng Xu; Satish K Madala; Jason C Woods Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2019-02-07
Authors: Peter J Niedbalski; Matthew M Willmering; Scott H Robertson; Matthew S Freeman; Wolfgang Loew; Randy O Giaquinto; Christopher Ireland; Ronald G Pratt; Charles L Dumoulin; Jason C Woods; Zackary I Cleveland Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-03-07 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Peter J Niedbalski; Alexander S Cochran; Teckla G Akinyi; Robert P Thomen; Elizabeth M Fugate; Diana M Lindquist; Ronald G Pratt; Zackary I Cleveland Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2020-04-14 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Andreas Boss; Laura Heeb; Divya Vats; Fabian H L Starsich; Alice Balfourier; Inge K Herrmann; Anurag Gupta Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 4.478