Literature DB >> 28804730

Breast dose reduction with organ-based, wide-angle tube current modulated CT.

Wanyi Fu1,2, Gregory M Sturgeon1, Greeshma Agasthya1, William Paul Segars1,3, Anuj J Kapadia1,4, Ehsan Samei1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

This study aimed to estimate the organ dose reduction potential for organ-dose-based tube current modulated (ODM) thoracic computed tomography (CT) with a wide dose reduction arc. Twenty-one computational anthropomorphic phantoms (XCAT) were used to create a virtual patient population with clinical anatomic variations. The phantoms were created based on patient images with normal anatomy (age range: 27 to 66 years, weight range: 52.0 to 105.8 kg). For each phantom, two breast tissue compositions were simulated: [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] (glandular-to-adipose ratio). A validated Monte Carlo program (PENELOPE, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain) was used to estimate the organ dose for standard tube current modulation (TCM) (SmartmA, GE Healthcare) and ODM (GE Healthcare) for a commercial CT scanner (Revolution, GE Healthcare) using a typical clinical thoracic CT protocol. Both organ dose and [Formula: see text]-to-organ dose conversion coefficients ([Formula: see text] factors) were compared between TCM and ODM. ODM significantly reduced all radiosensitive organ doses ([Formula: see text]). The breast dose was reduced by [Formula: see text]. For [Formula: see text] factors, organs in the anterior region (e.g., thyroid and stomach) exhibited substantial decreases, and the medial, distributed, and posterior region saw either an increase of less than 5% or no significant change. ODM significantly reduced organ doses especially for radiosensitive superficial anterior organs such as the breasts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  computed tomography; organ dose; organ dose based tube current modulation; tube current modulation

Year:  2017        PMID: 28804730      PMCID: PMC5544175          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.4.3.031208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  26 in total

1.  Radiation dose reduction to the breast in thoracic CT: comparison of bismuth shielding, organ-based tube current modulation, and use of a globally decreased tube current.

Authors:  Jia Wang; Xinhui Duan; Jodie A Christner; Shuai Leng; Lifeng Yu; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Radiation dose estimations to the thorax using organ-based dose modulation.

Authors:  Matthew P Lungren; Terry T Yoshizumi; Samuel M Brady; Greta Toncheva; Colin Anderson-Evans; Carolyn Lowry; Xiaodong R Zhou; Donald Frush; Lynne M Hurwitz
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Organ-based tube current modulation: are women's breasts positioned in the reduced-dose zone?

Authors:  Stephen Taylor; Diana E Litmanovich; Maryam Shahrzad; Alexander A Bankier; Pierre Alain Gevenois; Denis Tack
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 4.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure.

Authors:  David J Brenner; Eric J Hall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a review.

Authors:  Takeshi Kubo; Pei-Jan Paul Lin; Wolfram Stiller; Masaya Takahashi; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Yoshiharu Ohno; Hiroto Hatabu
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  The myth of the 50-50 breast.

Authors:  M J Yaffe; J M Boone; N Packard; O Alonzo-Proulx; S Y Huang; C L Peressotti; A Al-Mayah; K Brock
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Patient-specific radiation dose and cancer risk estimation in CT: part I. development and validation of a Monte Carlo program.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Ehsan Samei; W Paul Segars; Gregory M Sturgeon; James G Colsher; Greta Toncheva; Terry T Yoshizumi; Donald P Frush
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  In-plane bismuth breast shields for pediatric CT: effects on radiation dose and image quality using experimental and clinical data.

Authors:  Bradley L Fricke; Lane F Donnelly; Donald P Frush; Terry Yoshizumi; Vladimir Varchena; Stacy A Poe; Javier Lucaya
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Population of anatomically variable 4D XCAT adult phantoms for imaging research and optimization.

Authors:  W P Segars; Jason Bond; Jack Frush; Sylvia Hon; Chris Eckersley; Cameron H Williams; Jianqiao Feng; Daniel J Tward; J T Ratnanather; M I Miller; D Frush; E Samei
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Pros and cons of organ shielding for CT imaging.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-10-11
View more
  3 in total

1.  Advances in Computational Human Phantoms and Their Applications in Biomedical Engineering - A Topical Review.

Authors:  Wolfgang Kainz; Esra Neufeld; Wesley E Bolch; Christian G Graff; Chan Hyeong Kim; Niels Kuster; Bryn Lloyd; Tina Morrison; Paul Segars; Yeon Soo Yeom; Maria Zankl; X George Xu; Benjamin M W Tsui
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2019-01

2.  A scanner-specific framework for simulating CT images with tube current modulation.

Authors:  Giavanna Jadick; Ehsan Abadi; Brian Harrawood; Shobhit Sharma; W Paul Segars; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  A comparison of breast and lung doses from chest CT scans using organ-based tube current modulation (OBTCM) vs. Automatic tube current modulation (ATCM).

Authors:  Rick R Layman; Anthony J Hardy; Hyun J Kim; Ei Ne Chou; Maryam Bostani; Chris Cagnon; Dianna Cody; Michael McNitt-Gray
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.102

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.