Literature DB >> 28803265

Measuring the end-of-life premium in cancer using individual ex ante willingness to pay.

S Olofsson1,2, U-G Gerdtham3,4,5,6, L Hultkrantz7, U Persson3,5.   

Abstract

For the assessment of value of new therapies in healthcare, Health Technology Assessment (HTA) agencies often review the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Some HTA agencies accept a higher cost per QALY gained when treatment is aimed at prolonging survival for patients with a short expected remaining lifetime, a so-called end-of-life (EoL) premium. The objective of this study is to elicit the existence and size of an EoL premium in cancer. Data was collected from 509 individuals in the Swedish general population 20-80 years old using a web-based questionnaire. Preferences were elicited using subjective risk estimation and the contingent valuation (CV) method. A split-sample design was applied to test for order bias. The mean value of a QALY was MSEK4.8 (€528,000), and there was an EoL premium of 4-10% at 6 months of expected remaining lifetime. Using subjective risk resulted in more robust and valid estimates of the value of a QALY. Order of scenarios did not have a significant impact on the WTP and the result showed scale sensitivity. Our result provides some support for the use of an EoL premium based on individual preferences when expected remaining lifetime is short and below 24 months. Furthermore, we find support for a value of a QALY that is above the current threshold of several HTA agencies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Contingent valuation; End of life; Individual preferences; Value of a QALY; Willingness to pay

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28803265     DOI: 10.1007/s10198-017-0922-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Econ        ISSN: 1618-7598


  31 in total

1.  An inquiry into the different perspectives that can be used when eliciting preferences in health.

Authors:  Paul Dolan; Jan Abel Olsen; Paul Menzel; Jeff Richardson
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 2.  Willingness to pay for a QALY: theoretical and methodological issues.

Authors:  Dorte Gyrd-Hansen
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Willingness-to-pay as a measure of benefits. Relevant questions in the context of public decisionmaking about health care programs.

Authors:  A Gafni
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  The value of a QALY: individual willingness to pay for health gains under risk.

Authors:  Ana Bobinac; Job van Exel; Frans F H Rutten; Werner B F Brouwer
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Some reflections on cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  M Johannesson; D Meltzer
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Reimbursement Decisions for Pharmaceuticals in Sweden: The Impact of Disease Severity and Cost Effectiveness.

Authors:  Mikael Svensson; Fredrik O L Nilsson; Karl Arnberg
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  [Ingemar Engström, Swedish Society of Medicine: The wallet should not determine access to new and effective drugs].

Authors:  Ingemar Engström
Journal:  Lakartidningen       Date:  2015-03-24

8.  Emotions and scope effects in the monetary valuation of health.

Authors:  María V Avilés Blanco; Raúl Brey; Jorge Araña; José Luis Pinto Prades
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2017-03-24

9.  Valuing health at the end of life: a stated preference discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Koonal K Shah; Aki Tsuchiya; Allan J Wailoo
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Using the person trade-off approach to examine differences between individual and social values.

Authors:  P Dolan; C Green
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.046

View more
  1 in total

1.  Willingness-to-pay for cancer treatment and outcome: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alene Sze Jing Yong; Yi Heng Lim; Mark Wing Loong Cheong; Ednin Hamzah; Siew Li Teoh
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2021-12-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.