Literature DB >> 12825207

An inquiry into the different perspectives that can be used when eliciting preferences in health.

Paul Dolan1, Jan Abel Olsen, Paul Menzel, Jeff Richardson.   

Abstract

There are a number of perspectives that an individual could be asked to adopt in studies designed to elicit preferences for use in informing resource allocation decisions in health care. This paper develops a conceptual framework that clearly distinguishes between six different perspectives. It is argued that the appropriate perspective to use depends on normative considerations and the particular policy context to which it will be applied. We suggest a future research agenda that explicitly addresses these considerations and which involves direct empirical investigation into the effect of perspective on preferences. Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12825207     DOI: 10.1002/hec.760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  38 in total

Review 1.  Proxy evaluation of health-related quality of life: a conceptual framework for understanding multiple proxy perspectives.

Authors:  A Simon Pickard; Sara J Knight
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 2.  Willingness to pay for a QALY: theoretical and methodological issues.

Authors:  Dorte Gyrd-Hansen
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Using the stated preference technique for eliciting valuations: the role of the payment vehicle.

Authors:  Dorte Gyrd-Hansen
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Experience-Based Values: A Framework for Classifying Different Types of Experience in Health Valuation Research.

Authors:  Patricia Cubi-Molla; Koonal Shah; Kristina Burström
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  Discounting, preferences, and paternalism in cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Gustav Tinghög
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2012-09

6.  Measuring the end-of-life premium in cancer using individual ex ante willingness to pay.

Authors:  S Olofsson; U-G Gerdtham; L Hultkrantz; U Persson
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2017-08-12

7.  Public preferences for establishing nephrology facilities in Greenland: estimating willingness-to-pay using a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Trine Kjær; Mickael Bech; Christian Kronborg; Morten Raun Mørkbak
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2012-09-14

8.  Patient Preferences for Shared Decision Making: Not All Decisions Should Be Shared.

Authors:  Sarah E Lindsay; Aaron Alokozai; Sara L Eppler; Paige Fox; Catherine Curtin; Michael Gardner; Raffi Avedian; Ariel Palanca; Geoffrey D Abrams; Ivan Cheng; Robin N Kamal
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 9.  Valuation of health states in the US study to establish disability weights: lessons from the literature.

Authors:  Jürgen Rehm; Ulrich Frick
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.035

10.  The value of specialty oncology drugs.

Authors:  Dana P Goldman; Anupam B Jena; Darius N Lakdawalla; Jennifer L Malin; Jesse D Malkin; Eric Sun
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.