Literature DB >> 26093889

Reimbursement Decisions for Pharmaceuticals in Sweden: The Impact of Disease Severity and Cost Effectiveness.

Mikael Svensson1, Fredrik O L Nilsson2, Karl Arnberg2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Swedish Dental and Pharmaceutical Benefits Agency (TLV) is the government body responsible for deciding whether outpatient drugs are to be included in the pharmaceutical benefits scheme. This paper analyzes the impact of cost effectiveness and severity of disease on reimbursement decisions for new pharmaceuticals.
METHODS: Data has been extracted from all decisions made by the TLV between 2005 and 2011. Cost effectiveness is measured as the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, whereas disease severity is a binary variable (severe-not severe). In total, the dataset consists of 102 decisions, with 86 approved and 16 declined reimbursements.
RESULTS: The lowest cost per QALY of declined reimbursements is Swedish kronor (SEK) 700,000 (€ 79,100), while the highest cost per QALY of approved reimbursements is SEK1,220,000 (€ 135,600). At a cost per QALY of SEK702,000 Swedish kronor (non-severe diseases) and SEK988,000 (severe diseases), the likelihood of approval is estimated to be 50/50 (€ 79,400 and € 111,700).
CONCLUSIONS: The TLV places substantial weight on both the cost effectiveness and the severity of disease in reimbursement decisions, and the implied willingness to pay for a QALY is higher than the often cited 'rule of thumb' in Swedish policy debates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26093889     DOI: 10.1007/s40273-015-0307-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  19 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness analysis and the consistency of decision making: evidence from pharmaceutical reimbursement in australia (1991 to 1996).

Authors:  B George; A Harris; A Mitchell
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  "Yes", "No" or "Yes, but"? Multinomial modelling of NICE decision-making.

Authors:  Helen Angela Dakin; Nancy J Devlin; Isaac A O Odeyemi
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Reimbursement and clinical guidance for pharmaceuticals in Sweden: do health-economic evaluations support decision making?

Authors:  Anders Anell; Ulf Persson
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2005-09

4.  Value-based differential pricing: efficient prices for drugs in a global context.

Authors:  Patricia Danzon; Adrian Towse; Jorge Mestre-Ferrandiz
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  Unravelling drug reimbursement outcomes: a comparative study of the role of pharmacoeconomic evidence in Dutch and Swedish reimbursement decision making.

Authors:  Margreet Franken; Fredrik Nilsson; Frank Sandmann; Anthonius de Boer; Marc Koopmanschap
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  The role of value for money in public insurance coverage decisions for drugs in Australia: a retrospective analysis 1994-2004.

Authors:  Anthony H Harris; Suzanne R Hill; Geoffrey Chin; Jing Jing Li; Emily Walkom
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2008-03-31       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Using effectiveness and cost-effectiveness to make drug coverage decisions: a comparison of Britain, Australia, and Canada.

Authors:  Fiona M Clement; Anthony Harris; Jing Jing Li; Karen Yong; Karen M Lee; Braden J Manns
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The evaluation and use of economic evidence to inform cancer drug reimbursement decisions in Canada.

Authors:  Jean H E Yong; Jaclyn Beca; Jeffrey S Hoch
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  The Influence of Cost-Effectiveness and Other Factors on Nice Decisions.

Authors:  Helen Dakin; Nancy Devlin; Yan Feng; Nigel Rice; Phill O'Neill; David Parkin
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  A new reimbursement system for innovative pharmaceuticals combining value-based and free market pricing.

Authors:  Ulf Persson; Johanna Svensson; Billie Pettersson
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 2.561

View more
  25 in total

1.  What Can We Expect from Value-Based Funding of Medicines? A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Anthony Harris; Jing Jing Li; Karen Yong
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Measuring the end-of-life premium in cancer using individual ex ante willingness to pay.

Authors:  S Olofsson; U-G Gerdtham; L Hultkrantz; U Persson
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2017-08-12

3.  Cost Effectiveness of Nusinersen in the Treatment of Patients with Infantile-Onset and Later-Onset Spinal Muscular Atrophy in Sweden.

Authors:  Santiago Zuluaga-Sanchez; Megan Teynor; Christopher Knight; Robin Thompson; Thomas Lundqvist; Mats Ekelund; Annabelle Forsmark; Adrian D Vickers; Andrew Lloyd
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Revealed and Stated Preferences of Decision Makers for Priority Setting in Health Technology Assessment: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Peter Ghijben; Yuanyuan Gu; Emily Lancsar; Silva Zavarsek
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  A health economic simulation model for the clinical management of osteoporosis.

Authors:  E Jonsson; A Hansson-Hedblom; Ö Ljunggren; K Åkesson; A Spångeus; J A Kanis; F Borgström
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Acceptance and application of a broad population health perspective when evaluating vaccine.

Authors:  Ulf Persson; Sara Olofsson; Rikard Althin; Andreas Palmborg; Ann-Charlotte Dorange
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.169

7.  Economic Evaluation of Fulvestrant 500 mg Compared to Generic Aromatase Inhibitors in Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer in Sweden.

Authors:  Ugne Sabale; Mattias Ekman; Daniel Thunström; Claire Telford; Christopher Livings
Journal:  Pharmacoecon Open       Date:  2017-12

Review 8.  Using health technology assessment to assess the value of new medicines: results of a systematic review and expert consultation across eight European countries.

Authors:  Aris Angelis; Ansgar Lange; Panos Kanavos
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2017-03-16

9.  Why do health technology assessment coverage recommendations for the same drugs differ across settings? Applying a mixed methods framework to systematically compare orphan drug decisions in four European countries.

Authors:  Elena Nicod
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2016-08-18

10.  Annual dementia incidence and monetary burden attributable to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exposure in Sweden.

Authors:  Hedi Katre Kriit; Bertil Forsberg; Daniel Oudin Åström; Anna Oudin
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 5.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.