Literature DB >> 34901938

Surface Area of Decompressive Craniectomy Predicts Bone Flap Failure after Autologous Cranioplasty: A Radiographic Cohort Study.

W Chase Johnson1, Vijay M Ravindra2,3, Tristan Fielder4, Mariam Ishaque5, T Tyler Patterson1, Michael J McGinity1, John V Lacci4, Ramesh Grandhi3.   

Abstract

Skull bone graft failure is a potential complication of autologous cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy (DC). Our objective was to investigate the association of graft size with subsequent bone graft failure after autologous cranioplasty. This single-center retrospective cohort study included patients age ≥18 years who underwent primary autologous cranioplasty between 2010 and 2017. The primary outcome was bone flap failure requiring graft removal. Demographic, clinical, and radiographic factors were recorded; three-dimensional (3D) reconstructive imaging was used to perform accurate measurements. Univariate and multi-variate regression analysis were performed to identify risk factors for the primary outcome. Of the 131 patients who underwent primary autologous cranioplasty, 25 (19.0%) underwent removal of the graft after identification of bone flap necrosis on computed tomography (CT); 16 (64%) of these were culture positive. The mean surface area of craniectomy defect was 128.5 cm2 for patients with bone necrosis and 114.9 cm2 for those without bone necrosis. Linear regression analysis demonstrated that size of craniectomy defect was independently associated with subsequent bone flap failure; logistic regression analysis demonstrated a defect area >125 cm2 was independently associated with failure (odds ratio [OR] 3.29; confidence interval [CI]: 0.249-2.135). Patient- and operation-specific variables were not significant predictors of bone necrosis. Our results showed that increased size of antecedent DC is an independent risk factor for bone flap failure after autologous cranioplasty. Given these findings, clinicians should consider the increased potential of bone flap failure after autologous cranioplasty among patients whose initial DC was >125 cm2.

Entities:  

Keywords:  autologous; bone flap; cranioplasty; infection; resorption

Year:  2021        PMID: 34901938      PMCID: PMC8655795          DOI: 10.1089/neur.2021.0015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurotrauma Rep        ISSN: 2689-288X


  47 in total

1.  Hemodynamic and metabolic effects of decompressive hemicraniectomy in normal brain. An experimental PET-study in cats.

Authors:  Bernhard Schaller; Rudolf Graf; Yasuhiro Sanada; Gerhard Rosner; Klaus Wienhard; Wolf-Dieter Heiss
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-22       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 2.  Materials used in cranioplasty: a history and analysis.

Authors:  Aatman M Shah; Henry Jung; Stephen Skirboll
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.047

3.  Bone flap resorption: risk factors for the development of a long-term complication following cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy.

Authors:  Patrick Schuss; Hartmut Vatter; Agi Oszvald; Gerhard Marquardt; Lioba Imöhl; Volker Seifert; Erdem Güresir
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 5.269

4.  Bone flap storage following craniectomy: a survey of practices in major Australian neurosurgical centres.

Authors:  Ivan Paul Bhaskar; Nyi Nyi Zaw; Minghao Zheng; Gabriel Yin Foo Lee
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 1.872

5.  Cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy: is there a rationale for an initial artificial bone-substitute implant? A single-center experience after 631 procedures.

Authors:  Falko Schwarz; Pedro Dünisch; Jan Walter; Yasser Sakr; Rolf Kalff; Christian Ewald
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 5.115

6.  Prediction parameters of bone flap resorption following cranioplasty with autologous bone.

Authors:  Bernadette Schoekler; Martin Trummer
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 1.876

Review 7.  Autologous and acrylic cranioplasty: a review of 10 years and 258 cases.

Authors:  Daniel R Klinger; Christoper Madden; Joseph Beshay; Jonathan White; Kenneth Gambrell; Kim Rickert
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 2.104

8.  Quantitative and qualitative analysis of bone flap resorption in patients undergoing cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy.

Authors:  Tommi K Korhonen; Niina Salokorpi; Jaakko Niinimäki; Willy Serlo; Petri Lehenkari; Sami Tetri
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Predictors of primary autograft cranioplasty survival and resorption after craniectomy.

Authors:  Tommi K Korhonen; Sami Tetri; Jukka Huttunen; Antti Lindgren; Jaakko M Piitulainen; Willy Serlo; Pekka K Vallittu; Jussi P Posti
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 5.115

10.  Timing of cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy for trauma.

Authors:  Mark P Piedra; Andrew N Nemecek; Brian T Ragel
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2014-02-25
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Characterisation of Selected Materials in Medical Applications.

Authors:  Kacper Kroczek; Paweł Turek; Damian Mazur; Jacek Szczygielski; Damian Filip; Robert Brodowski; Krzysztof Balawender; Łukasz Przeszłowski; Bogumił Lewandowski; Stanisław Orkisz; Artur Mazur; Grzegorz Budzik; Józef Cebulski; Mariusz Oleksy
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 4.967

2.  Bifrontal Osteoplastic Flap: An Option to Decrease Infection in Bifrontal Craniotomies with Skull Base Osteotomies.

Authors:  Michael Ortiz Torres; Endrit Ziu; Samiat Agunbiade; Steven B Carr; N Scott Litofsky
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-01-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.