| Literature DB >> 28794439 |
Tatiane Aparecida Ribeiro1, Laize Peron Tófolo2,3, Isabela Peixoto Martins2, Audrei Pavanello2, Júlio Cezar de Oliveira4, Kelly Valério Prates2, Rosiane Aparecida Miranda5, Claudinéia Conationi da Silva Franco2, Rodrigo Mello Gomes6, Flávio Andrade Francisco2, Vander Silva Alves2, Douglas Lopes de Almeida2, Veridiana Mota Moreira2,3, Kesia Palma-Rigo2, Elaine Vieira7, Gabriel Sergio Fabricio2, Marcos Ricardo da Silva Rodrigues8, Wilson Rinaldi3, Ananda Malta2, Paulo Cezar de Freitas Mathias2.
Abstract
Low intensity exercise during pregnancy and lactation may create a protective effect against the development of obesity in offspring exposed to overnutrition in early life. To test these hypotheses, pregnant rats were randomly assigned into 2 groups: Sedentary and Exercised, low intensity, on a rodent treadmill at 30% VO2Max /30-minute/session/3x/week throughout pregnancy and the lactation. Male offspring were raised in small litters (SL, 3 pups/dam) and normal litters (NL, 9 pups/dam) as models of early overnutrition and normal feed, respectively. Exercised mothers showed low mesenteric fat pad stores and fasting glucose and improved glucose-insulin tolerance, VO2max during lactation and sympathetic activity. Moreover, the breast milk contained elevated levels of insulin. In addition, SL of sedentary mothers presented metabolic dysfunction and glucose and insulin intolerance and were hyperglycemic and hyperinsulinemic in adulthood. SL of exercised mothers showed lower fat tissue accretion and improvements in glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity, insulinemia and glycemia. The results suggest that maternal exercise during the perinatal period can have a possible reprogramming effect to prevent metabolic dysfunction in adult rat offspring exposed to early overnutrition, which may be associated with the improvement in maternal health caused by exercise.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28794439 PMCID: PMC5550501 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-07395-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Effect of low intensity physical exercise training on metabolism and fat pad stores in mothers.
| Parameters | SM-NL | SM-SL | EM-NL | EM-SL | Source of variation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fasting Insulin LD21 (ng/mL) | 0.55 ± 0.05 | 0.58 ± 0.04 | 0.52 ± 0.07 | 0.57 ± 0.04 | LxEns / Ens / Lns |
| Fasting Glucose LD21(mg/dL) | 99.5 ± 2.46 | 97.4 ± 2.56 | 79.5 ± 3.75 | 82.0 ± 4.76 | LxE* / E*** / Lns |
| HOMA-IR LD21 | 3.15 ± 0.46 | 2.88 ± 0.26 | 2.65 ± 0.42 | 2.96 ± 0.33 | LxE ns / E** /L* |
| Mesenteric fat pad LD21(g/100 g bw) | 0.72 ± 0.03 | 0.75 ± 0.04 | 0.51 ± 0.006 | 0.57 ± 0.03 | LxEns / E****/ Lns |
| VO2max Pregnancy day 0.5 (mL/kg/min) | 25.8 ± 1.01 | 25.13 ± 0,85 | 23.22 ± 1.23 | 22.45 ± 1.00 | LxE ns / Ens/ Lns |
| VO2max LD3 (mL/kg/min) | 19.46 ± 0.95 | 18.56 ± 0.73 | 22.52 ± 0.36 | 22.73 ± 0.35 | LxEns/ E****/ Lns |
| Parasympathetic electrical activity LD21(spike/s) | 16.04 ± 1.94 | 15.87 ± 1.49 | 16.79 ± 1.88 | 16.75 ± 1.84 | LxEns / Ens/ Lns |
| Sympathetic electrical activity LD21(spike/s) | 16.58 ± 1.06 | 17.04 ± 1.00 | 23.32 ± 2.32 | 25.19 ± 2.42 | LxEns / E***/ Lns |
Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. at LD21 (n = 10–12 per group). LxE, interaction between the exercise factor and the litter factor; E, exercise factor and L, litter factor; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 and ns, no significant difference, based on a two-way analysis of variance.
Figure 1Body weight in mothers. Effect of low intensity physical exercise training on the body weight of the mothers. The upper panel represents the area under the curve (AUC) of bw during pregnancy and lactation (n = 10–12 per group). LxE, interaction between the exercise factor and the litter factor; E, exercise factor and L, litter factor; *p < 0.05, each time points of the bw curve, was calculated by repeated measures ANOVA.
Figure 3Effect of low intensity physical exercise training on adult offspring body weight. Area under the curve of the body weight. LxE, interaction between the exercise factor and the litter factor; E, exercise factor and L, litter factor; *p < 0.05 and ***p < 0.0001 by two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test. (n = 6–18). The # or * represents p < 0.05 in each time points of the bw curve, was calculated by repeated measures ANOVA. Over the lines and bars, (*) represents NL-SM compared with SL-SM and (#) represents SL-SM compared to SL-EM.
Figure 2Effect of low intensity physical exercise training on glucose and insulin in mothers during the ivGTT. The upper panel represents the area under the curve (AUC). (a) plasma glucose, (b) plasma insulin,(c) increments (Δ) of plasma glucose and (d) increments (Δ) of plasma insulin after weaning until LD21 (n = 10–12 per group). LxE, interaction between the exercise factor and the litter factor; E, exercise factor and L, litter factor; *p < 0.05 and ***p < 0.001 by Student’s t test. And ****p < 0.0001, each time points of the plasma glucose and insulin during ivGTT, was calculated by repeated measures ANOVA.
Effect of low intensity physical exercise training on milk composition.
| Parameters | SM-NL | SM-SL | EM-NL | EM-SL | Source of variation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Insulin (ng/mL) | 1,40 ± 0.07 | 1.24 ± 0.10 | 2.22 ± 0.17 | 2.01 ± 0.19 | LxEns / E**** / Lns |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 139 ± 11.0 | 146 ± 10.4 | 142 ± 11.2 | 151 ± 11.0 | LxEns / Ens/ Lns |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 1738 ± 176 | 2170 ± 584 | 1487 ± 117 | 1606 ± 181 | LxEns / Ens/ Lns |
| Total Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 8.53 ± 9.0 | 89.02 ± 8.54 | 79.71 ± 7.5 | 83.96 ± 8.3 | LxEns / Ens/ Lns |
|
| |||||
| Insulin (ng/mL) | 1.15 ± 0.15 | 1.25 ± 0.15 | 2.37 ± 0.58 | 2.46 ± 0.51 | LxEns / E**** / Lns |
| Glucose (mg/dL) | 200 ± 39 | 210 ± 35,2 | 189 ± 19 | 220 ± 23.8 | LxEns / Ens/ Lns |
| Triglycerides (mg/dL) | 3373 ± 826 | 3786 ± 715 | 2831 ± 363 | 3292 ± 351 | LxEns / Ens/ Lns |
| Total Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 143 ± 14.0 | 163 ± 5.0 | 128 ± 8.8 | 129 ± 9.3 | LxEns / E*/ Lns |
Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. (n = 10-12 per group). LxE, interaction between the exercise factor and the litter factor; E, exercise factor and L, litter factor; *p < 0.05 and ****p < 0.0001 and ns, no significant difference, based on a two-way analysis of variance.
Effect of low intensity physical exercise training on metabolism and fat pad stores in offspring rats.
| Parameters | NL-SM | SL-SM | SL-SM | NL-EM | Source of variation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Birth weight (g) | 6.10 ± 0.02 | 6.14 ± 0.04 | 6.05 ± 0.01 | 6.10 ± 0.03 | LxEns / E*ns / Lns |
| Body weight (g) P21 | 47.0 ± 2.0 | 68.0 ± 1.7 | 46.9 ± 0.7 | 49.2 ± 1.3 | LxE* / E** / L**** |
| Body weight (g) P90 | 370. ± 6.6 | 406.6 ± 8.5 | 366.3 ± 3.9 | 374.2 ± 10.7 | LxE ns / E** /L* |
| Retroperitoneal fat pad (g/100 g) P90 | 1.248 ± 0.042 | 1.603 ± 0.099 | 1.09 ± 0.03 | 1.19 ± 0.113 | LxEns / E****/ L* |
| Periepididymal fat pad (g/100 g) P90 | 1.14 ± 0.040 | 1.39 ± 0.091 | 0.97 ± 0.02 | 1.03 ± 0.091 | LxE ns / E***/ L* |
| Mesenteric fat pad (g/100 g) P90 | 0.69 ± 0.030 | 1.06 ± 0.060 | 0.70 ± 0.03 | 0.73 ± 0.033 | LxE**** / E****/ L**** |
| Fasting Glucose (mg/dL) P90 | 83.57 ± 1.59 | 112.02 ± 1.68 | 97.08 ± 2.11 | 87.9 ± 2.46 | LxE**** / E****/ L**** |
| Fasting Insulin (ng/mL) P90 | 0.35 ± 0 01 | 0.54 ± 0.04 | 0. 25 ± 0.03 | 0.36 ± 0 05 | LxEns / E**/ L*** |
| HOMA-IR P90 | 1.86 ± 0.07 | 3.76 ± 0.30 | 1.37 ± 0.17 | 2.00 ± 0.29 | LxE** / E****/ L**** |
Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 6–18) at P0, P21 and P90. LxE, interaction between the exercise factor and the litter factor; E, exercise factor and L, litter factor; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 and ns, no significant difference, based on a two-way analysis of variance.
Figure 5Low intensity physical training program in female rats during pregnancy and lactation periods, according to velocity, duration and intensity of sessions.
Figure 4Effect of low intensity physical exercise training in adult offspring plasma glucose and insulin levels during the ivGTT. The upper panel represents the area under the curve (AUC). (a) plasma glucose, (b) plasma insulin, (c) increments (Δ) of plasma glucose and (d) increments (Δ) of plasma insulin. LxE, interaction between the exercise factor and the litter factor; E, exercise factor and L, litter factor; *p < 0.05 **p < 0.005 and ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 by two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s test. (n = 6–18). The # or * represents p < 0.05 in each time points of the bw curve, was calculated by repeated measures ANOVA. Over the lines and bars, (*) represents NL-SM compared with SL-SM and (#) represents SL-SM compared to SL-EM.