| Literature DB >> 24914402 |
Wilson Rinaldi1, Rodrigo Mello Gomes2, Dionízia Xavier Scomparin3, Sabrina Grassiolli3, Tatiane Aparecida Ribeiro4, Gabriel Sergio Fabricio1, Luiz Felipe Barella4, Audrei Pavanello4, Amanda Bianchi Trombini4, Paulo Cezar de Freitas Mathias4, Júlio Cezar de Oliveira4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Postnatal early overfeeding and physical inactivity are serious risk factors for obesity. Physical activity enhances energy expenditure and consumes fat stocks, thereby decreasing body weight (bw). This study aimed to examine whether low-intensity and moderate exercise training in different post-weaning stages of life is capable of modulating the autonomic nervous system (ANS) activity and inhibiting perinatal overfeeding-induced obesity in rats.Entities:
Keywords: Autonomic nervous system; Glucose homeostasis; Moderate exercise training; Overfeeding-induced obesity; Parasympathetic nervous system
Year: 2014 PMID: 24914402 PMCID: PMC4049453 DOI: 10.1186/1550-2783-11-25
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Int Soc Sports Nutr ISSN: 1550-2783 Impact factor: 5.150
Figure 1Schematical figure depicting the treadmill exercise training protocol. The time sessions, speed and duration depict the intensity of exercise training throughout the period in which exercise training protocol was performed. Exercise training protocol applied from 21- until 90-days-old (A); and applied from 21- until 50-days-old or from 60- until 90-days-old (B).
Effect of low-intensity and moderate exercise training during different ages on fasting glycemia and biometric parameters
| 386.7 ± 4.2 | 179.0 ± 5.1 | 0.88 ± 0.02 | 81.8 ± 3.0 | ||
| | 423.1 ± 6.4** | 205.0 ± 4.2** | 1.66 ± 0.03** | 109.4 ± 2.2** | |
| 334.5 ± 4.4* | 180.5 ± 3.2 | 0.66 ± 0.02* | 83.4 ± 2.1 | ||
| | 384.6 ± 5.0# | 204.8 ± 1.3 | 1.07 ± 0.02# | 89.5 ± 2.9# | |
| 395.8 ± 4.9 | 193.3 ± 3.2 | 0.76 ± 0.04 | 78.2 ± 1.9 | ||
| | 385.3 ± 10.1# | 206.5 ± 1.5 | 1.21 ± 0.04# | 94.2 ± 3.4# | |
| 387.7 ± 3.9 | 185.0 ± 5.7 | 0.73 ± 0.04 | 86.2 ± 3.2 | ||
| 380.2 ± 9.6# | 209.8 ± 4.7 | 0.97 ± 0.02# | 87.2 ± 1.5# |
All values are expressed as the mean ± SEM of 10–16 rats from each experimental group. *p < .05 and **p < .01 v.s. NL-N-EXE; #p < .05 v.s. SL-N-EXE; by one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey’s test.
Figure 2Intravenous glucose tolerance test (ivGTT). All values are expressed as the mean ± SEM of 12–15 rats for each experimental group. (A) NL-N-EXE versus SL-N-EXE; (B) NL-N-EXE versus all NL-EXE groups and (C) SL-N-EXE versus all SL-EXE groups. Symbols on the lines as well as letters on the bars represents the statistical difference by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test among groups. *p < .01 for NL-N-EXE v.s. SL-N-EXE, (Figure 2A); ##p < .01, #p < .05 for each one of SL-EXE group v.s. SL-N-EXE, (Figure 2C). The upper panel of each figure represents the area under the curve of glycemia during the ivGTT. (ns) Represents no statistical difference in the Figure 2B and (A) represents SL-N-EXE group in the Figure 2C.
Figure 3Electrical activity of the autonomic nervous system. All values are expressed as the mean ± SEM of 10–18 rats of each experimental group. The vagus (A) and greater splanchnic nerve (B) electrical activity. Symbols on the lines as well as letters on the bars represents the statistical difference by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test among groups. *p < .01 for SL-N-EXE v.s. NL-N-EXE; #p < .01 for each one of SL-EXE group v.s. SL-N-EXE; §p < .05 for each one of NL-EXE group v.s. NL-N-EXE. Representative records of each nerve discharge, which illustrate the data for each experimental group, are given in the Figure 3C.