| Literature DB >> 28785694 |
Abhishek Bhaskaran1, William Chik1, Stuart Thomas1, Pramesh Kovoor1, Aravinda Thiagalingam1.
Abstract
In light of recent reports showing high incidence of silent cerebral infarcts and organized atrial arrhythmias following radiofrequency (RF) atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, a review of its safety aspects is timely. Serious complications do occur during supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) ablations and knowledge of their incidence is important when deciding whether to proceed with ablation. Evidence is emerging for the probable role of prophylactic ischemic scar ablation to prevent VT. This might increase the number of procedures performed. Here we look at the various complications of RF ablation and also the methods to minimize them. Electronic database was searched for relevant articles from 1990 to 2015. With better awareness and technological advancements in RF ablation the incidence of complications has improved considerably. In AF ablation it has decreased from 6% to less than 4% comprising of vascular complications, cardiac tamponade, stroke, phrenic nerve injury, pulmonary vein stenosis, atrio-esophageal fistula (AEF) and death. Safety of SVT ablation has also improved with less than 1% incidence of AV node injury in AVNRT ablation. In VT ablation the incidence of major complications was 5-11%, up to 3.4%, up to 1.8% and 4.1-8.8% in patients with structural heart disease, without structural heart disease, prophylactic ablations and epicardial ablations respectively. Vascular and pericardial complications dominated endocardial and epicardial VT ablations respectively. Up to 3% mortality and similar rates of tamponade were reported in endocardial VT ablation. Recent reports about the high incidence of asymptomatic cerebral embolism during AF ablation are concerning, warranting more research into its etiology and prevention.Entities:
Keywords: AF ablation; AVNRT ablation; AVRT ablation; Coronary artery injury; Esophageal tissue injury; PVI; Popping; Pulmonary vein stenosis; Radiofrequency ablation; Safety; Stroke; VT ablation; Ventricular tachycardia ablation
Year: 2015 PMID: 28785694 PMCID: PMC5497290 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2015.04.011
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc ISSN: 2352-9067
Complications of atrial fibrillation ablation.
| Study | Type | Year | Procedure (n) | Major complications | Death | CVA | Tamponade | PVS | AEF | PNI | Vascular |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Worldwide survey | Multicenter survey | 1995–2002 | 11,672 | 6 | 0.05 | 0.94 | 1.22 | 1.31 (chronic) | 0.42 | 0.74 | 1 |
| Updated world-wide survey | Multicenter survey | 2003–2006 | 20,825 | 4.5 | 0.15 | 0.94 | 1.31 | 0.29 (intervention) | 0.04 | 0.17 | 1.5 |
| Baman et al. | Prospective | 2007–2010 | 1295 | 3.5 | 0 | 0.5 | 1.2 | – | 0 | 0 | 1.9 |
| Bertaglia et al. | Retrospective | 2011 | 2323 | 4 | 0 | 0.3 | 0.5 | – | – | 0.1 | 2.2 |
| Stabile et al. | Prospective | 2011 | 2167 | 3.7 | 0 | 0.3 | 0.6 | – | – | 0.1 | 2.1 |
AEF—atrio-esophageal fistula.
CVA—cerebrovascular accident (including transient ischemic attack).
PNI—phrenic nerve injury (needing intervention).
Complications of supra ventricular tachycardia ablation.
| Study | Type | Year | Procedure (n) | SVT type (%) | AV block | CVA | Tamponade (%) | Death (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MERFS | Prospective | 1987–1992 | 880 | AVNRT | 5.6 | – | – | – |
| Feldman et al. | Retrospective | 1999–2009 | 1419 | AVNRT | 0.07 | – | – | – |
| O'Hara et al. | Prospective | 1993–2006 | 5330 | AVNRT | 0.22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| AVRT | 0.17 | 0 | 0.09 | 0 | ||||
| AT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
| A Fl | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
AP—accessory pathway, AVNRT—AV nodal reentrant tachycardia.
A Fl—atrial flutter.
High grade requiring pacemaker implantation.
Stroke and TIA.
Complications of ventricular tachycardia ablation.
| Study | Type | Year | Proc (n) | VT type | Major complications | Death | CVA | Tamponade | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sauer et al. | Prospective | 1999–2005 | 327 | ICM, NICM | 2.1% | Nil | 0.9% | 1.2 | – |
| Euro VT | Prospective | 1999–2003 | 63 | ICM | 1.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Bohnen et al. | Prospective | 2009–2011 | 250 | SHD | 6% | 0.4% | 0.8% | 1.4% | |
| Mallidi et al. | Meta-analysis | 1965–2010 | 457 | SHD | 6.3% | 1% | 1% | – | AV block |
| Tokuda et al. | Prospective | 1999–2010 | 226 | NICM | 5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | Perforation 1.8% |
| Dinov et al. help-VT study | Prospective | 2008–2011 | 227 | ICM, DCM | 11% | 0.4% | – | 0.8% | AV block 0.8% |
| Peichl et al. | Prospective | 2006–2012 | 473 | 8% | 0 | 0.8% | 0.6% | AV block 1.3% | |
| Della Bella et al. | Prospective | 2007–2012 | 634 | SHD | 7% | 0.1% | 0 | 2% | Vascular 4% |
| Inada et al. | Prospective | 1999–2008 | 285 | IVT | 7% | 3.8% | 0.7% | 0.7% | AV block 1% |
| Bohnen et al. | Prospective | 2009–2011 | 119 | IVT | 3.4% | 0 | 0.8% | 0.8% | |
| Peichl et al. | Prospective | 2006–2012 | 249 | IVT | 2.8% | 0 | 0.4% | 0 | AV block 0.4% |
| SMASH VT | RCT | 2004–2006 | 64 | ICM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 DVT, 1 CCF |
| VTACH | RCT | 2002–2006 | 54 | ICM | 1.8% | 0 | 1.8% | – | 1 ST elevation |
| Della Bella et al. | Multicenter Survey | 2001–2009 | 218 | SHD, NSHD | 4.1% | 0 | 0 | 3.7% | 1 abdominal hemorrhage |
| Sacher et al. | Multicenter Survey | 2001–2007 | 136 | SHD | 7% | 0 | 0 | 5.1% | CA stenosis 0.6% |
| Tung et al. | Single center Survey | 2004–2011 | 109 | SHD, NSHD | 8.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.7% epicardial bleeding |
RCT — randomized controlled trial.
CVA—cerebrovascular accident (including transient ischemic attack).
IVT- Idiopathic Ventricular Tachycardia
SHD- Structural Heart Disease
NSHD- No Structural Heart Disease
ICM- Ischemic Cardiomyopathy
NICM- Non Ischemic Cardiomyopathy
High grade requiring pacemaker implantation.