Literature DB >> 8131762

The Multicentre European Radiofrequency Survey (MERFS): complications of radiofrequency catheter ablation of arrhythmias. The Multicentre European Radiofrequency Survey (MERFS) investigators of the Working Group on Arrhythmias of the European Society of Cardiology.

G Hindricks1.   

Abstract

Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation has developed into a new non-pharmacological therapy for the definitive treatment of patients with cardiac arrhythmias. Although an increasing number of recent reports have indicated the widespread use of the procedure, no data are available to estimate the number of procedures performed in Europe. Furthermore, currently no data on a large series of patients are available that provide information on the risk of procedure-related complications. This report presents the results of the Multicentre European Radiofrequency Survey (MERFS) that was conducted by the Working Group on Arrhythmias of the European Society of Cardiology. The objectives of this voluntary retrospective survey were to assess the number of radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures performed in 86 European institutions from January 1987 until March 1992 and the incidence of procedure-related complications with respect to the different types of ablative procedures. A total of 4398 patients were reported on from 68 out of 86 institutions (79%) from 15 European countries that agreed to participate in MERFS. From 1987 to 1991, the number of patients who underwent RF ablation per year increased from 45 to 2000. In the first 3 months of 1992, a total of 1640 patients were reported on. The number of patients reported on in relation to the different types of ablative procedures were: ablation of atrial tachycardialatrial flutter: n = 141 (3.2%); ablation of the atrioventricular junction: n = 900 (20.5%); modification of the atrioventricular junction in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: n = 815 (18.5%); ablation of accessory pathway: n = 2222 (50.5%); ablation of ventricular tachycardia: n = 320 (7.3%). Procedure-related complications occurred in 223 patients (5.1%). The incidence of complications in relation to the ablative procedure was: ablation of atrial tachycardia/atrial flutter: 5.0%; ablation of the atrioventricular junction: 3.2%; modification of the atrioventricular junction in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia: 8.0%; ablation of accessory pathway: 4.4%; ablation of ventricular tachycardia: 7.5%. Complications occurred significantly more often in patients who underwent modification of the atrioventricular junction in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia, when compared to ablation of the atrioventricular junction (P < 0.001) or ablation of accessory pathway (P < 0.001), and in patients who underwent ablation of ventricular tachycardia, when compared to ablation of the atrioventricular junction (P < 0.002) or ablation of accessory pathway (P < 0.02). The highest incidence of complications was reported after modification of the atrioventricular junction in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8131762     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/14.12.1644

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  52 in total

1.  Outpatient transseptal radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular accessory pathways-ready for prime time?

Authors:  N A Estes
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 2.  [Cardiology update. I: Electrophysiology].

Authors:  P Weismüller; H J Trappe
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1999-01-15

Review 3.  Endocavitary treatment of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  S B Olsson; E I Hertervig; O Kongstad; C Meurling; S Yuan
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 4.  [Catheter ablation and implantable atrial defibrillators in supraventricular cardiac arrhythmias].

Authors:  W Jung; B Schumacher; B Lüderitz
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1997-04-15

5.  Treatment of atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia by cryoablation with an 8-mm-tip catheter versus radiofrequency ablation.

Authors:  Ngai-Yin Chan; Ngai-Shing Mok; Chi-Chung Choy; Chun-Leung Lau; Pui-Shan Chu; Ho-Chuen Yuen; Suet-Ting Lau
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 6.  Asymptomatic Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome: incidental ECG diagnosis and a review of literature regarding current treatment.

Authors:  Alexander Liu; Pawan Pusalkar
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2011-06-29

7.  Should ablation be the first line treatment for supraventricular arrhythmias?

Authors:  F G Cosío
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 8.  Catheter Ablation to Treat Supraventricular Arrhythmia in Children and Adults With Congenital Heart Disease: What We Know and Where We Are Going.

Authors:  Patricia E Thomas; Scott L Macicek
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2016

9.  Catheter ablation of accessory pathways near the coronary sinus: value of defining coronary arterial anatomy.

Authors:  Jessica Mao; John M Moriarty; Ravi Mandapati; Noel G Boyle; Kalyanam Shivkumar; Marmar Vaseghi
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 6.343

10.  Femoral vein thrombosis after right-sided electrophysiological procedures.

Authors:  Ghassan Moubarak; Stéphanie Bonhomme; Géraldine Vedrenne; Claire Bouleti; Jacky Ollitrault; Pascal Priollet; Romain Cador; Serge Cazeau
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.