BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has proven to be an effective and safe treatment in patients with ventricular and atrial tachyarrhythmias. Among complications arising after RFA, the incidence of coronary artery (CA) injury is exceedingly low. When CA injury does occur, however, it can be clinically devastating. The proximity of CAs to common ablation sites suggests that the relationship between RFA and CA perfusion pathophysiology is important for optimal lesion formation and safe arrhythmia treatments. OBJECTIVE: Although others have described the presentation and outcomes of patients with CA injury after ablation, a review that consolidates the mechanisms of CA injury after RFA has yet to be presented in the cardiology literature. METHODS: We conducted an extensive literature search of studies published over the past 30 years that relate the biophysics of RFA with CA perfusion pathophysiology and injury. RESULTS: We present a review of the dynamic relationship between RFA and CA perfusion. We describe RFA lesion pathology, mechanisms of CA injury from RFA, and factors that influence lesion formation, such as convective cooling and the shadow effect. CONCLUSION: We summarize methods to mitigate CA injury after RFA and propose new research avenues to optimize lesion formation and safe arrhythmia treatments when tissue is ablated in the vicinity of CAs.
BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has proven to be an effective and safe treatment in patients with ventricular and atrial tachyarrhythmias. Among complications arising after RFA, the incidence of coronary artery (CA) injury is exceedingly low. When CA injury does occur, however, it can be clinically devastating. The proximity of CAs to common ablation sites suggests that the relationship between RFA and CA perfusion pathophysiology is important for optimal lesion formation and safe arrhythmia treatments. OBJECTIVE: Although others have described the presentation and outcomes of patients with CA injury after ablation, a review that consolidates the mechanisms of CA injury after RFA has yet to be presented in the cardiology literature. METHODS: We conducted an extensive literature search of studies published over the past 30 years that relate the biophysics of RFA with CA perfusion pathophysiology and injury. RESULTS: We present a review of the dynamic relationship between RFA and CA perfusion. We describe RFA lesion pathology, mechanisms of CA injury from RFA, and factors that influence lesion formation, such as convective cooling and the shadow effect. CONCLUSION: We summarize methods to mitigate CA injury after RFA and propose new research avenues to optimize lesion formation and safe arrhythmia treatments when tissue is ablated in the vicinity of CAs.
Authors: Isaac A Thyer; Pramesh Kovoor; Michael A Barry; Jim Pouliopoulos; David L Ross; Aravinda Thiagalingam Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2006-05
Authors: Marmar Vaseghi; David A Cesario; Aman Mahajan; Isaac Wiener; Noel G Boyle; Michael C Fishbein; Barbara Natterson Horowitz; Kalyanam Shivkumar Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2006-06
Authors: T Jared Bunch; Srijoy Mahapatra; G Keith Bruce; Susan B Johnson; Dylan V Miller; Benjamin D Horne; Xiao-Li Wang; Hon-Chi Lee; Noel M Caplice; Douglas L Packer Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-05-22 Impact factor: 29.690