Literature DB >> 28785367

Prediction-Oriented Marker Selection (PROMISE): With Application to High-Dimensional Regression.

Soyeon Kim1, Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani2, J Jack Lee2.   

Abstract

In personalized medicine, biomarkers are used to select therapies with the highest likelihood of success based on an individual patient's biomarker/genomic profile. Two goals are to choose important biomarkers that accurately predict treatment outcomes and to cull unimportant biomarkers to reduce the cost of biological and clinical verifications. These goals are challenging due to the high dimensionality of genomic data. Variable selection methods based on penalized regression (e.g., the lasso and elastic net) have yielded promising results. However, selecting the right amount of penalization is critical to simultaneously achieving these two goals. Standard approaches based on cross-validation (CV) typically provide high prediction accuracy with high true positive rates but at the cost of too many false positives. Alternatively, stability selection (SS) controls the number of false positives, but at the cost of yielding too few true positives. To circumvent these issues, we propose prediction-oriented marker selection (PROMISE), which combines SS with CV to conflate the advantages of both methods. Our application of PROMISE with the lasso and elastic net in data analysis shows that, compared to CV, PROMISE produces sparse solutions, few false positives, and small type I + type II error, and maintains good prediction accuracy, with a marginal decrease in the true positive rates. Compared to SS, PROMISE offers better prediction accuracy and true positive rates. In summary, PROMISE can be applied in many fields to select regularization parameters when the goals are to minimize false positives and maximize prediction accuracy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cross-validation; Lasso; Personalized medicine; Predictive marker; Stability Selection; Variable Selection

Year:  2016        PMID: 28785367      PMCID: PMC5543994          DOI: 10.1007/s12561-016-9169-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Biosci        ISSN: 1867-1764


  24 in total

1.  Regression approaches for microarray data analysis.

Authors:  Mark R Segal; Kam D Dahlquist; Bruce R Conklin
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.479

Review 2.  Clinical, pathological and molecular prognostic factors in prostate cancer decision-making process.

Authors:  Dario Pugliese; Giuseppe Palermo; Angelo Totaro; Pier Francesco Bassi; Francesco Pinto
Journal:  Urologia       Date:  2016-02-24

3.  Adaptive clinical trial designs in oncology.

Authors:  Yong Zang; J Jack Lee
Journal:  Chin Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-12

4.  Incorporating group correlations in genome-wide association studies using smoothed group Lasso.

Authors:  Jin Liu; Jian Huang; Shuangge Ma; Kai Wang
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 5.899

5.  Down-regulation of Gadd45 expression is associated with tumor differentiation in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Hiroshi Higashi; Daniel Vallböhmer; Ute Warnecke-Eberz; Shuichi Hokita; Huan Xi; Jan Brabender; Ralf Metzger; Stephan E Baldus; Shoji Natsugoe; Takashi Aikou; Arnulf H Hölscher; Paul M Schneider
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.480

6.  Effects of GM-CSF and M-CSF on tumor progression of lung cancer: roles of MEK1/ERK and AKT/PKB pathways.

Authors:  Yoshiki Uemura; Makoto Kobayashi; Hideshi Nakata; Tetsuya Kubota; Kentaro Bandobashi; Tsuyako Saito; Hirokuni Taguchi
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.101

7.  Predictive and prognostic molecular markers for cancer medicine.

Authors:  Sunali Mehta; Andrew Shelling; Anita Muthukaruppan; Annette Lasham; Cherie Blenkiron; George Laking; Cristin Print
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 8.168

8.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent.

Authors:  Jerome Friedman; Trevor Hastie; Rob Tibshirani
Journal:  J Stat Softw       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 6.440

Review 9.  Aryl hydrocarbon receptor and lung cancer.

Authors:  Junchieh J Tsay; Kam-Meng Tchou-Wong; Alissa K Greenberg; Harvey Pass; William N Rom
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.480

10.  The BATTLE trial: personalizing therapy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Edward S Kim; Roy S Herbst; Ignacio I Wistuba; J Jack Lee; George R Blumenschein; Anne Tsao; David J Stewart; Marshall E Hicks; Jeremy Erasmus; Sanjay Gupta; Christine M Alden; Suyu Liu; Ximing Tang; Fadlo R Khuri; Hai T Tran; Bruce E Johnson; John V Heymach; Li Mao; Frank Fossella; Merrill S Kies; Vassiliki Papadimitrakopoulou; Suzanne E Davis; Scott M Lippman; Waun K Hong
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 39.397

View more
  4 in total

1.  Germinal Immunogenetics predict treatment outcome for PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors.

Authors:  Sadal Refae; Jocelyn Gal; Nathalie Ebran; Josiane Otto; Delphine Borchiellini; Frederic Peyrade; Emmanuel Chamorey; Patrick Brest; Gérard Milano; Esma Saada-Bouzid
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2019-08-11       Impact factor: 3.850

2.  3' UTR shortening represses tumor-suppressor genes in trans by disrupting ceRNA crosstalk.

Authors:  Hyun Jung Park; Ping Ji; Soyeon Kim; Zheng Xia; Benjamin Rodriguez; Lei Li; Jianzhong Su; Kaifu Chen; Chioniso P Masamha; David Baillat; Camila R Fontes-Garfias; Ann-Bin Shyu; Joel R Neilson; Eric J Wagner; Wei Li
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2018-05-21       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Collective effects of long-range DNA methylations predict gene expressions and estimate phenotypes in cancer.

Authors:  Soyeon Kim; Hyun Jung Park; Xiangqin Cui; Degui Zhi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Measuring individual benefits of psychiatric treatment using longitudinal binary outcomes: Application to antipsychotic benefits in non-cannabis and cannabis users.

Authors:  Xuan Zhang; Jose de Leon; Benedicto Crespo-Facorro; Francisco J Diaz
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 1.503

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.