Literature DB >> 28776575

An oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma quantitative histomorphometric-based image classifier of nuclear morphology can risk stratify patients for disease-specific survival.

Cheng Lu1,2, James S Lewis3,4,5,6, William D Dupont7, W Dale Plummer7, Andrew Janowczyk2, Anant Madabhushi2.   

Abstract

Oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma is the most common type of head and neck carcinoma. Its incidence is increasing worldwide, and it is associated with major morbidity and mortality. It is often unclear which patients have aggressive, treatment refractory tumors vs those whose tumors will be more responsive to treatment. Better identification of patients with high- vs low-risk cancers could help provide more tailored treatment approaches and could improve survival rates while decreasing treatment-related morbidity. This study investigates computer-extracted image features of nuclear shape and texture on digitized images of H&E-stained tissue sections for risk stratification of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma patients compared with standard clinical and pathologic parameters. With a tissue microarray cohort of 115 retrospectively identified oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma patients, 50 were randomly chosen as the modeling set, and the remaining 65 constituted the test set. Following nuclear segmentation and feature extraction, the Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to identify the five most prognostic quantitative histomorphometric features from the modeling set. These top ranked features were then combined via a machine learning classifier to construct the oral cavity histomorphometric-based image classifier (OHbIC). The classifier was then validated for its ability to risk stratify patients for disease-specific outcomes on the test set. On the test set, the classifier yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.72 in distinguishing disease-specific outcomes. In univariate survival analysis, high-risk patients predicted by the classifier had significantly poorer disease-specific survival (P=0.0335). In multivariate analysis controlling for T/N-stage, resection margins, and smoking status, positive classifier results were independently predictive of poorer disease-specific survival: hazard ratio (95% confidence interval)=11.023 (2.62-46.38) and P=0.001. Our results suggest that quantitative histomorphometric features of local nuclear architecture derived from digitized H&E slides of oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas are independently predictive of patient survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28776575      PMCID: PMC6128166          DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.98

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  36 in total

1.  Systematic analysis of breast cancer morphology uncovers stromal features associated with survival.

Authors:  Andrew H Beck; Ankur R Sangoi; Samuel Leung; Robert J Marinelli; Torsten O Nielsen; Marc J van de Vijver; Robert B West; Matt van de Rijn; Daphne Koller
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 17.956

2.  Tumor evolution and intratumor heterogeneity of an oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma revealed by whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Xinyi Cindy Zhang; Chang Xu; Ryan M Mitchell; Bo Zhang; Derek Zhao; Yao Li; Xin Huang; Wenhong Fan; Hongwei Wang; Luisa Angelica Lerma; Melissa P Upton; Ashley Hay; Eduardo Méndez; Lue Ping Zhao
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.715

3.  Spatially aware cell cluster(spACC1) graphs: predicting outcome in oropharyngeal pl6+ tumors.

Authors:  Sahirzeeshan Ali; James Lewis; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2013

4.  High-grade endometrial stromal sarcomas: a clinicopathologic study of a group of tumors with heterogenous morphologic and genetic features.

Authors:  Andrew P Sciallis; Patrick P Bedroske; John K Schoolmeester; William R Sukov; Gary L Keeney; Jennelle C Hodge; Debra A Bell
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 6.394

5.  Histologic and systemic prognosticators for local control and survival in margin-negative transoral laser microsurgery treated oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Parul Sinha; Mitra Mehrad; Rebecca D Chernock; James S Lewis; Samir K El-Mofty; Ningying Wu; Brian Nussenbaum; Bruce H Haughey
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 3.147

6.  Validation of the risk model: high-risk classification and tumor pattern of invasion predict outcome for patients with low-stage oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Yufeng Li; Shuting Bai; William Carroll; Dan Dayan; Joseph C Dort; Keith Heller; George Jour; Harold Lau; Carla Penner; Michael Prystowsky; Eben Rosenthal; Nicolas F Schlecht; Richard V Smith; Mark Urken; Marilena Vered; Beverly Wang; Bruce Wenig; Abdissa Negassa; Margaret Brandwein-Gensler
Journal:  Head Neck Pathol       Date:  2012-12-19

7.  MATH, a novel measure of intratumor genetic heterogeneity, is high in poor-outcome classes of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Edmund A Mroz; James W Rocco
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 5.337

Review 8.  Trends in head and neck cancer incidence in relation to smoking prevalence: an emerging epidemic of human papillomavirus-associated cancers?

Authors:  Erich M Sturgis; Paul M Cinciripini
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Fractal analysis of nuclear histology integrates tumor and stromal features into a single prognostic factor of the oral cancer microenvironment.

Authors:  Pinaki Bose; Nigel T Brockton; Kelly Guggisberg; Steven C Nakoneshny; Elizabeth Kornaga; Alexander C Klimowicz; Mauro Tambasco; Joseph C Dort
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Predicting non-small cell lung cancer prognosis by fully automated microscopic pathology image features.

Authors:  Kun-Hsing Yu; Ce Zhang; Gerald J Berry; Russ B Altman; Christopher Ré; Daniel L Rubin; Michael Snyder
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  18 in total

1.  Nuclear shape and orientation features from H&E images predict survival in early-stage estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers.

Authors:  Cheng Lu; David Romo-Bucheli; Xiangxue Wang; Andrew Janowczyk; Shridar Ganesan; Hannah Gilmore; David Rimm; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 5.662

Review 2.  Artificial Intelligence in Pathology.

Authors:  Sebastian Försch; Frederick Klauschen; Peter Hufnagl; Wilfried Roth
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Reimagining T Staging Through Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Image Processing Approaches in Digital Pathology.

Authors:  Kaustav Bera; Ian Katz; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2020-11

Review 4.  Applications of machine learning in drug discovery and development.

Authors:  Jessica Vamathevan; Dominic Clark; Paul Czodrowski; Ian Dunham; Edgardo Ferran; George Lee; Bin Li; Anant Madabhushi; Parantu Shah; Michaela Spitzer; Shanrong Zhao
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 84.694

5.  Computational Analysis of Routine Biopsies Improves Diagnosis and Prediction of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy.

Authors:  Eliot G Peyster; Andrew Janowczyk; Abigail Swamidoss; Samhith Kethireddy; Michael D Feldman; Kenneth B Margulies
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 39.918

6.  Computational pathology reveals unique spatial patterns of immune response in H&E images from COVID-19 autopsies: preliminary findings.

Authors:  Germán Corredor; Paula Toro; Kaustav Bera; Dylan Rasmussen; Vidya Sankar Viswanathan; Christina Buzzy; Pingfu Fu; Lisa M Barton; Edana Stroberg; Eric Duval; Hannah Gilmore; Sanjay Mukhopadhyay; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2021-07-13

Review 7.  Artificial intelligence in digital pathology - new tools for diagnosis and precision oncology.

Authors:  Kaustav Bera; Kurt A Schalper; David L Rimm; Vamsidhar Velcheti; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 8.  The contribution of artificial intelligence to reducing the diagnostic delay in oral cancer.

Authors:  Betul Ilhan; Pelin Guneri; Petra Wilder-Smith
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 5.337

Review 9.  Artificial Intelligence-based methods in head and neck cancer diagnosis: an overview.

Authors:  Hanya Mahmood; Muhammad Shaban; Nasir Rajpoot; Syed A Khurram
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 9.075

10.  Nuclear shape, architecture and orientation features from H&E images are able to predict recurrence in node-negative gastric adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Meng-Yao Ji; Lei Yuan; Xiao-Da Jiang; Zhi Zeng; Na Zhan; Ping-Xiao Huang; Cheng Lu; Wei-Guo Dong
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.