Germán Corredor1,2, Paula Toro1, Kaustav Bera1, Dylan Rasmussen1, Vidya Sankar Viswanathan1, Christina Buzzy1, Pingfu Fu3, Lisa M Barton4, Edana Stroberg4, Eric Duval4, Hannah Gilmore5, Sanjay Mukhopadhyay6, Anant Madabhushi1,2. 1. Case Western Reserve University, Center for Computational Imaging and Personalized Diagnostics, Cleveland, Ohio, United States. 2. Louis Stokes Cleveland VA Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, United States. 3. Case Western Reserve University, Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland, Ohio, United States. 4. Oklahoma Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States. 5. University Hospitals, Department of Pathology, Cleveland, Ohio, United States. 6. Cleveland Clinic, Department of Pathology, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.
Abstract
Purpose: We used computerized image analysis and machine learning approaches to characterize spatial arrangement features of the immune response from digitized autopsied H&E tissue images of the lung in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Additionally, we applied our approach to tease out potential morphometric differences from autopsies of patients who succumbed to COVID-19 versus H1N1. Approach: H&E lung whole slide images from autopsy specimens of nine COVID-19 and two H1N1 patients were computationally interrogated. 606 image patches ( ∼ 55 per patient) of 1024 × 882 pixels were extracted from the 11 autopsied patient studies. A watershed-based segmentation approach in conjunction with a machine learning classifier was employed to identify two types of nuclei families: lymphocytes and non-lymphocytes (i.e., other nucleated cells such as pneumocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils). Based off the proximity of the individual nuclei, clusters for each nuclei family were constructed. For each of the resulting clusters, a series of quantitative measurements relating to architecture and density of nuclei clusters were calculated. A receiver operating characteristics-based feature selection method, violin plots, and the t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding algorithm were employed to study differences in immune patterns. Results: In COVID-19, the immune response consistently showed multiple small-size lymphocyte clusters, suggesting that lymphocyte response is rather modest, possibly due to lymphocytopenia. In H1N1, we found larger lymphocyte clusters that were proximal to large clusters of non-lymphocytes, a possible reflection of increased prevalence of macrophages and other immune cells. Conclusion: Our study shows the potential of computational pathology to uncover immune response features that may not be obvious by routine histopathology visual inspection.
Purpose: We used computerized image analysis and machine learning approaches to characterize spatial arrangement features of the immune response from digitized autopsied H&E tissue images of the lung in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. Additionally, we applied our approach to tease out potential morphometric differences from autopsies of patients who succumbed to COVID-19 versus H1N1. Approach: H&E lung whole slide images from autopsy specimens of nine COVID-19 and two H1N1patients were computationally interrogated. 606 image patches ( ∼ 55 per patient) of 1024 × 882 pixels were extracted from the 11 autopsied patient studies. A watershed-based segmentation approach in conjunction with a machine learning classifier was employed to identify two types of nuclei families: lymphocytes and non-lymphocytes (i.e., other nucleated cells such as pneumocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils). Based off the proximity of the individual nuclei, clusters for each nuclei family were constructed. For each of the resulting clusters, a series of quantitative measurements relating to architecture and density of nuclei clusters were calculated. A receiver operating characteristics-based feature selection method, violin plots, and the t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding algorithm were employed to study differences in immune patterns. Results: In COVID-19, the immune response consistently showed multiple small-size lymphocyte clusters, suggesting that lymphocyte response is rather modest, possibly due to lymphocytopenia. In H1N1, we found larger lymphocyte clusters that were proximal to large clusters of non-lymphocytes, a possible reflection of increased prevalence of macrophages and other immune cells. Conclusion: Our study shows the potential of computational pathology to uncover immune response features that may not be obvious by routine histopathology visual inspection.
Authors: Ajay Nagesh Basavanhally; Shridar Ganesan; Shannon Agner; James Peter Monaco; Michael D Feldman; John E Tomaszewski; Gyan Bhanot; Anant Madabhushi Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2009-10-30 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Thais Mauad; Ludhmila A Hajjar; Giovanna D Callegari; Luiz F F da Silva; Denise Schout; Filomena R B G Galas; Venancio A F Alves; Denise M A C Malheiros; Jose O C Auler; Aurea F Ferreira; Marcela R L Borsato; Stephania M Bezerra; Paulo S Gutierrez; Elia T E G Caldini; Carlos A Pasqualucci; Marisa Dolhnikoff; Paulo H N Saldiva Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2009-10-29 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Kurt A Schalper; Jason Brown; Daniel Carvajal-Hausdorf; Joseph McLaughlin; Vamsidhar Velcheti; Konstantinos N Syrigos; Roy S Herbst; David L Rimm Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2015-02-03 Impact factor: 11.816
Authors: Khalid AbdulJabbar; Shan E Ahmed Raza; Rachel Rosenthal; Mariam Jamal-Hanjani; Selvaraju Veeriah; Ayse Akarca; Tom Lund; David A Moore; Roberto Salgado; Maise Al Bakir; Luis Zapata; Crispin T Hiley; Leah Officer; Marco Sereno; Claire Rachel Smith; Sherene Loi; Allan Hackshaw; Teresa Marafioti; Sergio A Quezada; Nicholas McGranahan; John Le Quesne; Charles Swanton; Yinyin Yuan Journal: Nat Med Date: 2020-05-27 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Kristine E Konopka; Teresa Nguyen; Jeffrey M Jentzen; Omar Rayes; Carl J Schmidt; Allecia M Wilson; Carol F Farver; Jeffrey L Myers Journal: Histopathology Date: 2020-09-12 Impact factor: 7.778