Literature DB >> 28774355

Funding quality pre-kindergarten slots with Philadelphia's new 'sugary drink tax': simulating effects of using an excise tax to address a social determinant of health.

Brent A Langellier1, Félice Lê-Scherban2, Jonathan Purtle1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Philadelphia passed a 1·5-cent-per-ounce sweetened beverage tax (SBT). Revenue will fund 10 000 quality pre-kindergarten slots for poor children. It is imperative to understand how revenue from SBT can be used to fund programmes to address education and other social determinants of health. The objective of the present study was to simulate quality pre-kindergarten attendance, educational achievement and sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption among Philadelphia children and adolescents under six intervention scenarios: (i) no intervention; (ii) 10 000 additional quality pre-kindergarten slots; (iii) a 1·5-cent-per-ounce SBT; (iv) expanded pre-kindergarten and 1·5-cent-per-ounce SBT; (v) a 3-cent-per-ounce SBT; and (vi) expanded pre-kindergarten and 3-cent-per-ounce SBT.
DESIGN: We used an agent-based model to estimate pre-kindergarten enrolment, educational achievement and SSB consumption under the six policy scenarios. We identified key parameters in the model from the published literature and secondary analyses of the Panel Study of Income Dynamics - Child Development Supplement.
SETTING: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
SUBJECTS: Philadelphia children and adolescents aged 4-18 years.
RESULTS: A 1·5-cents-per-ounce tax would reduce SSB consumption by 1·3 drinks/week among Philadelphia children and adolescents relative to no intervention, with larger effects among children below the poverty level. Quality pre-kindergarten expansion magnifies the effect of the SBT by 8 %, but has the largest effect on moderate-income children just above the poverty level. The SBT and quality pre-kindergarten programme each reduce SSB consumption, but primarily benefit different children and adolescents.
CONCLUSIONS: Pairing an excise tax with a complementary programme to improve a social determinant of health represents a progressive strategy to combat obesity, a disease regressive in its social patterning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beverage tax; Education and health; Health disparities; Health policy; Social determinants of health

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28774355     DOI: 10.1017/S1368980017001756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Nutr        ISSN: 1368-9800            Impact factor:   4.022


  6 in total

1.  Complex Systems Approaches to Diet: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Brent A Langellier; Usama Bilal; Felipe Montes; Jose D Meisel; Letícia de Oliveira Cardoso; Ross A Hammond
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Applications of Complex Systems Models to Improve Retail Food Environments for Population Health: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Megan R Winkler; Yeeli Mui; Shanda L Hunt; Melissa N Laska; Joel Gittelsohn; Melissa Tracy
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 11.567

3.  Analyzing Policies Through a DOHaD Lens: What Can We Learn?

Authors:  Julia M Goodman; Janne Boone-Heinonen; Dawn M Richardson; Sarah B Andrea; Lynne C Messer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 4.  Associations between Governmental Policies to Improve the Nutritional Quality of Supermarket Purchases and Individual, Retailer, and Community Health Outcomes: An Integrative Review.

Authors:  Alyssa J Moran; Yuxuan Gu; Sasha Clynes; Attia Goheer; Christina A Roberto; Anne Palmer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Low-income parents' perceptions of a sweetened beverage tax in Philadelphia.

Authors:  Emma K Edmondson; Judy A Shea; Emily F Gregory; Christina A Roberto; Stephanie M Garcia; Jeemin Kwon; Senbagam Virudachalam
Journal:  J Nutr Sci       Date:  2022-08-22

6.  Exploring attitudes toward taxation of sugar-sweetened beverages in rural Michigan.

Authors:  Andrea E Bombak; Taylor E Colotti; Dolapo Raji; Natalie D Riediger
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 2.000

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.