| Literature DB >> 28770305 |
Piotr Minias1, Zachary W Bateson2, Linda A Whittingham2, Jeff A Johnson3, Sara Oyler-McCance4, Peter O Dunn2.
Abstract
Gene polymorphisms shared between recently diverged species are thought to be widespread and most commonly reflect introgression from hybridization or retention of ancestral polymorphism through incomplete lineage sorting. Shared genetic diversity resulting from incomplete lineage sorting is usually maintained for a relatively short period of time, but under strong balancing selection it may persist for millions of years beyond species divergence (balanced trans-species polymorphism), as in the case of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genes. However, balancing selection is much less likely to act on non-MHC immune genes. The aim of this study was to investigate the patterns of shared polymorphism and selection at non-MHC immune genes in five grouse species from Centrocercus and Tympanuchus genera. For this purpose, we genotyped five non-MHC immune genes that do not interact directly with pathogens, but are involved in signaling and regulate immune cell growth. In contrast to previous studies with MHC, we found no evidence for balancing selection or balanced trans-species polymorphism among the non-MHC immune genes. No haplotypes were shared between genera and in most cases more similar allelic variants sorted by genus. Between species within genera, however, we found extensive shared polymorphism, which was most likely attributable to introgression or incomplete lineage sorting following recent divergence and large ancestral effective population size (i.e., weak genetic drift). Our study suggests that North American prairie grouse may have attained relatively low degree of reciprocal monophyly at nuclear loci and reinforces the rarity of balancing selection in non-MHC immune genes.Entities:
Keywords: Ancestral polymorphism; Grouse; Immune genes; Introgression; Reciprocal monophyly; Selection
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28770305 PMCID: PMC5818594 DOI: 10.1007/s00251-017-1024-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Immunogenetics ISSN: 0093-7711 Impact factor: 2.846
Fig. 1Contemporary (full color) and historic (semi-transparent color) distributions of Centrocercus (Gunnison sage-grouse C. minimus—dark blue, greater sage-grouse C. urophasianus—violet) and Tympanuchus (greater prairie-chicken T. cupido—orange, lesser prairie-chicken T. pallidicinctus—light blue, sharp-tailed chicken T. phasianellus—green) grouse. Approximate locations of sampled populations are shown
Polymorphism of five immune genes in Centrocercus and Tympanuchus grouse
| ChB6 | IAP-1 | IL-2 | TGF-β3 | TRAIL-like | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fragment region | Exon 3 | Exon 2 | Promoter | Intron 4 | Intron 1 |
| Fragment size | 114 bp | 323 bp | 412 bp | 685 bp | 555 bp |
| No. of variable sites | 6 | 7 | 14 | 24 | 34 |
| No. of haplotypes | 11 | 8 | 15 | 19 | 35 |
| Average no. of nucleotide differences | 2.62 ± 0.18 | 1.93 ± 0.35 | 2.19 ± 0.21 | 4.80 ± 0.63 | 4.53 ± 0.30 |
Within-species polymorphism of five immune genes in Centrocercus and Tympanuchus grouse, where n IND is the number of individuals genotyped, n VS is the number of variable sites and n HAP is the number of SNP haplotypes (number of private haplotypes n PRIV.HAP in parentheses)
| Genus/species |
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ChB6 | IAP-1 | IL-2 | TGF-β3 | TRAIL-like | Total | ||
|
| |||||||
| | 30 | 0/1 (0) | 0/1 (0) | 1/2 (1) | 0/1 (0) | 3/2 (0) | 4/7 (1) |
| | 29–30 | 2/4 (3) | 1/2 (1) | 0/1 (0) | 1/2 (1) | 8/7 (5) | 13/17 (10) |
|
| |||||||
| | 28–30 | 3/4 (0) | 3/4 (0) | 5/5 (4) | 7/9 (9) | 7/9 (3) | 25/31 (16) |
| | 30 | 3/4 (0) | 2/3 (0) | 5/6 (2) | 1/2 (1) | 5/6 (1) | 16/21 (4) |
| | 247 | 4/7 (3) | 5/6 (2) | 6/7 (3) | 7/7 (6) | 20/24 (14) | 42/51 (28) |
Fig. 2Bayesian 50% majority-rule consensus trees obtained for five immune genes (exons: ChB6 and IAP-1; promoter: IL-2; introns: TGF-β3 and TRAIL-like) in Centrocercus (Cemi C. minimus, Ceur C. urophasianus) and Tympanuchus (Tycu T. cupido, Typa T. pallidicinctus, Typh T. phasianellus) grouse. Alleles shared between species are indicated by acronyms given in brackets. Centrocercus and Tympanuchus alleles are marked in red and blue, respectively. Weakly supported nodes are represented as unresolved. Bayesian posterior probabilities above 50% are indicated at the nodes. The domestic chicken Gallus gallus was used as the outgroup
Fig. 3Median-joining haplotype networks for five immune genes (exons: ChB6 and IAP-1; promoter: IL-2; introns: TGF-β3 and TRAIL-like) in Centrocercus and Tympanuchus grouse. Circles represent individual haplotypes, and the diameter of each circle corresponds to the number of samples with that particular haplotype. Tick marks between circles denote mutational steps required to connect haplotypes