Literature DB >> 25554526

Differential introgression and effective size of marker type influence phylogenetic inference of a recently divergent avian group (Phasianidae: Tympanuchus).

Stephanie J Galla1, Jeff A Johnson2.   

Abstract

Life history strategies can influence the effective population size (Ne) of loci differently based on their mode of inheritance. Recognizing how this may affect the rate of lineage sorting among marker types is important for studies focused on resolving phylogenetic relationships among recently divergent taxa. In this study, we use gene tree, coalescent-based species tree, and isolation-with-migration analyses to explore the differences between marker types (autosomal, Z-linked, and mitochondrial) in resolving phylogenetic relationships among North American prairie grouse (Tympanuchus). We found that Z-linked loci were more likely to identify monophyletic relationships among prairie grouse species compared to autosomal and mtDNA loci in both species and gene tree analyses, with species tree analyses outperforming gene trees. These results were further supported with isolation-with-migration analyses, where Z-linked loci largely followed a strict isolation model while autosomal loci were more likely to fit a model with gene flow between species following population divergence. While accounting for differences in inheritance pattern (or Ne) for marker type, results suggest that additional factors, such as strong sexual selection and sex-biased introgression (i.e., male-biased postzygotic hybrid behavioral isolation or "unsexy son"), may further explain the decreased diversity levels and increased rate of lineage sorting observed with the Z-linked loci relative to autosomal and mtDNA loci. In fact, to our knowledge no hybrid male prairie grouse have been observed breeding in the wild, yet hybrid females along with backcross females are known to produce viable offspring. Overall, this study highlights that more work is needed to determine how complex models of gene flow (i.e., sex biased introgression) and differences in the effective size among marker types based on differing life history strategies influence divergence date estimation and species delimitation.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Effective population size; Hybridization; Mito-nuclear discordance; Sexual selection; Species tree; Z-chromosome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25554526     DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.12.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol        ISSN: 1055-7903            Impact factor:   4.286


  6 in total

1.  Matching loci surveyed to questions asked in phylogeography.

Authors:  Chih-Ming Hung; Sergei V Drovetski; Robert M Zink
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Contrasting evolutionary histories of MHC class I and class II loci in grouse--effects of selection and gene conversion.

Authors:  P Minias; Z W Bateson; L A Whittingham; J A Johnson; S Oyler-McCance; P O Dunn
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Extensive shared polymorphism at non-MHC immune genes in recently diverged North American prairie grouse.

Authors:  Piotr Minias; Zachary W Bateson; Linda A Whittingham; Jeff A Johnson; Sara Oyler-McCance; Peter O Dunn
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 2.846

4.  Evaluation of a Chicken 600K SNP genotyping array in non-model species of grouse.

Authors:  Piotr Minias; Peter O Dunn; Linda A Whittingham; Jeff A Johnson; Sara J Oyler-McCance
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Avian Introgression Patterns are Consistent With Haldane's Rule.

Authors:  Jente Ottenburghs
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 2.679

6.  The rates of introgression and barriers to genetic exchange between hybridizing species: sex chromosomes vs autosomes.

Authors:  Christelle Fraïsse; Himani Sachdeva
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 4.562

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.